Linguistik-Klassifikation
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (52)
- Review (8)
- Part of Periodical (4)
- Report (2)
- Book (1)
- Part of a Book (1)
- Preprint (1)
Language
- German (38)
- English (16)
- Multiple languages (5)
- Portuguese (5)
- Turkish (5)
Has Fulltext
- yes (69)
Keywords
- Deutsch als Fremdsprache (16)
- Deutsch (13)
- Fremdsprachenunterricht (12)
- Deutschunterricht (9)
- Sprachunterricht (7)
- Textproduktion (7)
- Fremdsprachenlernen (6)
- Interkulturalität (6)
- Schreibunterricht (6)
- Germanistik (5)
- Linguistik (5)
- Türkei (5)
- Literaturwissenschaft (4)
- Tschechische Republik (4)
- Vergleichende Literaturwissenschaft (4)
- Vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft (4)
- Zeitschrift (4)
- Computerunterstützter Unterricht (3)
- Didaktik (3)
- Interkulturelles Verstehen (3)
- Lehrerbildung (3)
- Muttersprachlicher Unterricht (3)
- Phraseologie (3)
- literacy (3)
- writing research (3)
- E-Learning (2)
- Fremdsprache (2)
- Interkulturelles Lernen (2)
- Lehren (2)
- Leseverstehen (2)
- Medienkompetenz (2)
- Mehrsprachigkeit (2)
- Mentales Lexikon (2)
- Portugiesisch (2)
- Schulleistungstest (2)
- Slowakei (2)
- Spracherwerb (2)
- Sprachtest (2)
- Tschechisch (2)
- Zweisprachiger Unterricht (2)
- Zweisprachigkeit (2)
- teacher education (2)
- Anzeige (1)
- Assoziation (1)
- Aufgabensammlung (1)
- Bildung (1)
- Brasilien (1)
- Chengyu (1)
- Chengyu-Geschichte (1)
- Computer Games (1)
- Computerspiel (1)
- Das Andere (1)
- Deutsche <Motiv> (1)
- Deutschland (1)
- Deutschlehrer (1)
- Deutschlehrerausbildung (1)
- Dialog (1)
- Digital Culture (1)
- Digital Literacy (1)
- English Curriculum (1)
- Erwachsenenbildung (1)
- Fachsprache (1)
- Fremdbild (1)
- Grammatik (1)
- Heterogenität (1)
- Historische Morphologie (1)
- Hochschule (1)
- Hypertext (1)
- Hören (1)
- Hörverstehen (1)
- Idiom (1)
- Informationstechnik (1)
- Informationsvermittlung (1)
- Interferenz <Linguistik> (1)
- Internet (1)
- Jugendliteratur (1)
- Kinderliteratur (1)
- Komposition <Wortbildung> (1)
- Kongress (1)
- Kontrastive Linguistik (1)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (1)
- L1 (1)
- Lautmalerei (1)
- Lehrmittel (1)
- Lehrmittelanalyse (1)
- Lernen (1)
- Lernmotivation (1)
- Lernsoftware (1)
- Leseerziehung (1)
- Lesekompetenz (1)
- Lexem (1)
- Lied (1)
- Linearität <Linguistik> (1)
- Literacy (1)
- Literatur-Geschichte-Philosophie-System (1)
- Lyrik (1)
- Makedonien (1)
- Mass media culture (1)
- Media ecology (1)
- Mediensprache (1)
- Mikroblog (1)
- Modalverb (1)
- Multimodal Writing (1)
- Multimodalität (1)
- Netzwerktheorie (1)
- PIRLS (1)
- Plagiarism (1)
- Polysemie (1)
- Psychoanalyse (1)
- Sachunterricht (1)
- School (1)
- Schreiben (1)
- Schreibenlernen (1)
- Schultheater (1)
- Schüler (1)
- Semantik (1)
- Social Media (1)
- Sprachlehrforschung (1)
- Sprachliche Minderheit (1)
- Sprachnorm (1)
- Sprichwort (1)
- Staatsprüfung (1)
- Standardsprache (1)
- Studienaustausch (1)
- Subjektivität (1)
- Text (1)
- Textgliederung (1)
- Twitter <Softwareplattform> (1)
- Türkisch (1)
- Unterrichtsmethode (1)
- Visual literacy (1)
- Vokabellernen (1)
- Vorlesen (1)
- Wahrnehmung (1)
- Wirtschaftssprache (1)
- Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten (1)
- Wortbildung (1)
- Zuhören (1)
- Zweitsprache (1)
- argumentative texts (1)
- assessment (1)
- bilingual education (1)
- children's literature (1)
- chinesische Idiome (1)
- classroom interaction (1)
- college composition (1)
- computer (1)
- creative drama (1)
- das ChaF-Selbstlernen (1)
- destrangement (1)
- development (1)
- disciplinary awareness (1)
- elementary school (1)
- expert guidance (1)
- hypertext (1)
- immigrant minority language teaching (1)
- knowledge acquisition (1)
- language acquisition (1)
- language policy (1)
- learning environments (1)
- mediating tools (1)
- müssen (1)
- preschool (1)
- reading Chinese (1)
- reading ESL (1)
- reading instruction (1)
- school ethnography (1)
- storytelling (1)
- support system (1)
- teacher training (1)
- teaching practices (1)
- teaching reading (1)
- technology (1)
- the teaching of writing (1)
- undergraduate writing (1)
- writing (1)
- writing in the disciplines (1)
- writing quality (1)
- writing assessment (1)
- writing processes (1)
- Übersetzung (1)
Institute
The writing program at Cornell University involves professors from across the disciplines teaching writing courses at each level of students' undergraduate careers. This program undertook an assessment of its effectiveness in the years 2002-2004. The process of creating and carrying out an assessment developed by professors involved in the program is reported, and the assessment results are presented. These results lead the writer to argue for the assessment process itself as a key experience in developing the disciplinary awareness of participating professors, who became involved in deep questioning of what 'good' student writing might be in higher education, and in what relationship to the language practices of each discipline. The assessment project's challenges and benefits support the value of assessment of students' work across disciplines as fundamentally owned by each discipline.
This paper describes the current approach to the instruction of Hebrew as a mother-tongue (L1) language based on technological developments and on the relationship between technology and pedagogy. As such, we rely on well-known models of integrating computerized tools and distance learning in the educational system, while emphasizing the potential contribution of these environments to L1 education. At the core of this paper is the combination of linguistic and didactic approaches to L1 teaching that bring together both theoretical and functional aspects of learning and teaching language via a computer. The focus here is on technologically-based L1 learning environments that combine different types of computerized tools within a comprehensive language-learning/teaching system that is designed for facilitating and improving language skills. This system is cognitively motivated, and is modeled on a combination of elements, such as principles of constructivist, social, and active learning. The structural-conceptual framework of this environment complies with principles of both local and global connectivity and hierarchy. For example, at the local level, learning materials are connected through a hypertext structure; at the global level, the entire system is inter-connected, with assignments linked to dictionaries and relevant websites, and the learners themselves connected through email and forums. The teaching/learning processes that take place within this L1 environment are illustrated by examples of both online and offline computerized courses.
This article presents a research project conducted in a class of secondary school (first year) which linked reading, writing and acting. In this project, the teacher attempted to provide a support system for both first and second language acquisition. The idea was to use Greek tales published in a simplified version to look for ideas, vocabulary, routines, in other words what students were able to use when they acted then wrote the text of their own play. This constant back and forth between the oral and written format under the guidance of the expert formed the backbone of the system designed to help them discover a language beyond the daily contacts and a deep displeasure at school. With the help of the adults and of the mediating tools such as literature and acting they were able to collectively write a play that integrated many aspects of written French. In books they discovered worlds beyond their own that they can access when they open and use them. These crucial lessons, not only for students who are considered unable to study with a standard curriculum but also for teachers who are to work with them or similar students, serve to question notions such as creative drama and literacy.
This study conducted in Hong Kong used multiple regression procedures to investigate the relationship between primary school children's reading test scores and the frequency with which forty-two instructional practices were used by their literacy teachers. Analyses were conducted separately for reading in English language and in Chinese (Modern Standard Written Chinese). Subjects comprised 4,329 Cantonese-speaking students (2,157 girls; 2,172 boys) aged approximately 9+ years, and their 256 teachers (129 teachers of English; 127 teachers of Chinese). Results suggest that no single instructional practice was highly correlated with students' reading achievement in English or Chinese, and in fact some practices demonstrated a negative association. However, certain practices, particularly related to the use and nature of resource materials and to assessment strategies, did demonstrate a positive association with reading performance. Similarities and differences between Chinese and English data are discussed.
In this paper we propose that hypertext writing at school could have beneficial effects on the acquisition of content knowledge and the acquisition of writing skills compared to linear writing. We view the effects of hypertext writing on writing skills from the perspective of "shared" cognitive activities in writing linear texts and hypertexts. In a pilot study we examined the effects of hypertext writing on writing processes and we related the occurrence of writing processes to the quality of the resulting writing products. We set up this study to identify students' cognitive activities during hypertext and linear writing. We also tried to determine whether hypertext writing could facilitate linear writing. We focused on the most central, distinctive features of linear and hypertext writing. For linear writing, this is a linearization process: i.e., transforming elements of content into linear text. For hypertext writing, this is a hierarchicalization process: converting a linearly presented line of thought into a hierarchical structure. Students (N = 123) from Grades 8 and 9 performed two linearization tasks and two hierarchicalization tasks under think aloud conditions Results showed that Planning and Analyzing activities contributed to the final quality of hypertexts and linear texts, and that these activities were more often elicited in hypertext tasks than in linear writing. We argue that writing hypertexts stimulates the use of writing activities that are positively related to writing proficiency. Moreover, we speculate that creating hypertext writing conditions and optimizing these conditions for different writer/learner styles might be a theoretical and practical challenge for mother tongue teaching.
In their out-of-school lives, young people are immersed in rich and complex digital worlds, characterised by image and multimodality. Computer games in particular present young people with specific narrative genres and textual forms: contexts in which meaning is constructed interactively and drawing explicitly on a wide range of design elements including sound, image, gesture, symbol, colour and so on. As English curriculum seeks to address the changing nature of literacy, challenges are raised, particularly with respect to the ways in which multimodal texts might be incorporated alongside print based forms of literacy. Questions focus both on the ways in which such texts might be created, studied and assessed, and on the implications of the introduction of such texts for print based literacies. This paper explores intersections between writing and computer games within the English classroom, from a number of junior secondary examples. In particular it considers tensions that arise when young people use writing to recreate or respond to multimodal forms. It explores ways in which writing is stretched and challenged by enterprises such as these, ways in which students utilise and adapt print based modes to represent multimodal forms of narrative, and how teachers and curriculum might respond. Consideration is given to the challenges posed to teaching and assessment by bringing writing to bear as the medium of analysis of, and response to, multimodal texts.
This article considers the impact on the teaching of writing and the curriculum, of changes in culture associated with mass media and new means of communication such as the internet. It specifically focuses on the implications these changes might have for the ways in which writing is taught and practised in schooling today. The article is based on interviews with three Swedish upper-secondary school mother-tongue teachers and presents their views on how the writing situation has changed for their students. According to the teachers, the curriculum faces challenges from students' access to and use of mass media culture and computer-mediated communications. For example, the teachers reported that students currently are less interested in grammar and spelling, and more interested in images and layout. Students also use what teachers consider to be plagiarism in their methods of communication. The article draws on media ecology to understand these reported changes in the sense that students are seen to develop new media practices involving several media-specific competences (Mackey, 2002) which gives them access to new ways of meaning-making in their acts of reading or writing. It is tentatively claimed that students may thus develop alternative notions of authors as well as texts, which affect their own view of text production in school. Other theoretical frameworks drawn on in the article include Habermas' discussion of how the public and private sphere fuse and Ziehe's (1989) perceptions of teachers as 'relation workers' in increasingly intimate school environments.
This special issue of L1–Educational Studies in Language and Literature focuses on what it means to teach writing in secondary schools in the age of new media. We approach this topic from the understanding hat people worldwide are now operating within a 'changing semiotic landscape' (Kress & van Leeuwen, 1996) that is associated with social, economic and technological change. This changing landscape of communication is affecting not only how we read and write, but also is expanding the range of semiotic modes and media with we habitually engage in order to make meaning, communicate and get things done in the world. Now, for example, in order to be fully literate, people need not only to be able to read and write using language and the technology of pen and paper; they also need to be able to comprehend, design, compose and disseminate multimodal meanings using digital multimedia. The new digital media in turn are dominated by the representation space of the screen (rather than the page), the meaning-making mode of the image, and the multiple and non-linear affordances of electronic hypertext. These developments pose significant challenges for teachers charged with the responsibility of teaching language, literature and communication, and it is to precisely to these challenges that the authors in this special issue turn their attention.
This paper discusses recent developments in policies and practices of immigrant minority language teaching in the Netherlands. It focuses on the realisation of this provision as 'language support'. Within this arrangement, an immigrant minority language is used as a medium of instruction for parts of the regular primary school curriculum. Following Goodlad et al. (1979), we identify different versions of the language support curriculum on the basis of in-depth analyses of policy documents from the national and local government (the formal curriculum), and the National Educational Innovation Centre for Primary Education and the Inspectorate of Education (the ideological curriculum). In addition, we analyse policies and practices with respect to language support at a multicultural primary school on the basis of observations, interviews, and school documents (the perceived, operational and experiential curriculum). The analyses reveal how policy makers, practitioners, and pupils differ in their understanding of the notion of language support. They also show how inaccurate assumptions with respect to the pupils' relative command in Dutch and the minority language impact on actual practices of language support.
This review of research in college composition divides the field into research focused on the student writer, the teacher of college composition, and the contexts of writing. The period under review is characterized by the "social turn," an effort to situate the writer within social, political, and other contexts in which teaching and writing take place. The author finds that, early in the 21st century, the field of college composition lacks the sort of monolith—such as the "current rhetorical" tradition that has now been largely abandoned—that galvanized teachers and researchers of college composition in the past. As a consequence, the field presently lacks a clear focus or direction.