Linguistik-Klassifikation
Refine
Year of publication
- 2006 (11) (remove)
Document Type
- Preprint (6)
- Conference Proceeding (2)
- Article (1)
- Book (1)
- Part of a Book (1)
Language
- English (11) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (11)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (11)
Keywords
- Computerlinguistik (3)
- Suchmaschine (2)
- Benutzeroberfläche (1)
- Deutsch (1)
- Japanisch (1)
- Lexical Resource Semantics (1)
- Lexicalized Tree Adjoining Grammar (1)
- Maschinelle Übersetzung (1)
- Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> (1)
- Syntax (1)
Institute
- Extern (11)
This paper compares two approaches to computational semantics, namely semantic unification in Lexicalized Tree Adjoining Grammars (LTAG) and Lexical Resource Semantics (LRS) in HPSG. There are striking similarities between the frameworks that make them comparable in many respects. We will exemplify the differences and similarities by looking at several phenomena. We will show, first of all, that many intuitions about the mechanisms of semantic computations can be implemented in similar ways in both frameworks. Secondly, we will identify some aspects in which the frameworks intrinsically differ due to more general differences between the approaches to formal grammar adopted by LTAG and HPSG.
This report explores the question of compatibility between annotation projects including translating annotation formalisms to each other or to common forms. Compatibility issues are crucial for systems that use the results of multiple annotation projects. We hope that this report will begin a concerted effort in the field to track the compatibility of annotation schemes for part of speech tagging, time annotation, treebanking, role labeling and other phenomena.