Sustainable Architecture for Finance in Europe (SAFE)
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Working Paper (21)
- Part of Periodical (15)
- Report (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (38)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (38)
Keywords
- Household Finance (12)
- Consumers (4)
- Coronavirus (4)
- Household Crisis Barometer (4)
- Household income (4)
- Investor Protection (4)
- Private Investment (4)
- Financial Literacy (3)
- Household finance (3)
- Inflation (3)
- Monetary Policy (3)
- Pension (3)
- Pension Insurance (3)
- Retail investors (3)
- Consumption (2)
- Demography (2)
- Financial Decisions (2)
- Social System (2)
- financial advice (2)
- Anlageentscheidung (1)
- Anlegerschutz (1)
- Bankberatung (1)
- Beitragsgarantien (1)
- Belief Formation (1)
- Bitcoin (1)
- Capital Markets Union (1)
- Covid-19 (1)
- Cryptocurrencies (1)
- Digitalisierung (1)
- Dividends (1)
- Excess sensitivity (1)
- Experimental Economics (1)
- Experimental Finance (1)
- Field Experiment (1)
- Fin Tech (1)
- Financial Advice (1)
- Finanzbildung (1)
- Fiscal Policies (1)
- Fiscal Stimulus Program (1)
- Gambling (1)
- Haushaltskrisenbarometer (1)
- Helicoptergeld (1)
- Household Consumption (1)
- Incentives (1)
- Individual Investors (1)
- Inflation Beliefs (1)
- Information Treatment (1)
- Investor behavior (1)
- Investor education (1)
- Investors Heterogeneity (1)
- Kinderbonus (1)
- Lottery stocks (1)
- Maximum Likelihood (1)
- Mehrwertsteuersenkung (1)
- Niedrigzinsen (1)
- Parameter Elicitation (1)
- Pensions Dashboard (1)
- Private Altersvorsorge (1)
- Prospect Theory (1)
- Rendite (1)
- Rente (1)
- Rententransparenz (1)
- Riester-Rente (1)
- Risikomaße (1)
- Risk Aversion (1)
- Risk Preferences (1)
- Self-control (1)
- Stock market wealth (1)
- Structured retail products (1)
- Sustainable Finance (1)
- Trading (1)
- Utility Theory (1)
- Wertpapierberatung (1)
- betting (1)
- client involvement (1)
- consumer protection (1)
- credence goods (1)
- digital planning tool (1)
- discrimination (1)
- dividends (1)
- educational intervention (1)
- financial risk-taking (1)
- financial services (1)
- fintech (1)
- free dividend fallacy (1)
- functional finance approach (1)
- household finance (1)
- individual investor (1)
- individual investors (1)
- individuelle Altersvorsorge (1)
- investment behavior (1)
- investment biases (1)
- investment decisions (1)
- investor behavior (1)
- level playing field (1)
- lottery-type assets (1)
- peer effects (1)
- portfolio allocation (1)
- retirement planning (1)
- risk preference (1)
- saving behavior (1)
- self-control (1)
- social networks (1)
- spillover effects (1)
- stock market investment (1)
- trading behavior (1)
- trend chasing (1)
- financial literacy (1)
Smart(phone) investing? A within investor-time analysis of new technologies and trading behavior
(2021)
Using transaction-level data from two German banks, we study the effects of smartphones on investor behavior. Comparing trades by the same investor in the same month across different platforms, we find that smartphones increase purchasing of riskier and lottery-type assets and chasing past returns. After the adoption of smartphones, investors do not substitute trades across platforms and buy also riskier, lottery-type, and hot investments on other platforms. Using smartphones to trade specific assets or during specific hours contributes to explain our results. Digital nudges and the device screen size do not mechanically drive our results. Smartphone effects are not transitory.
Shortcomings revealed by experimental and theoretical researchers such as Allais (1953), Rabin (2000) and Rabin and Thaler (2001) that put the classical expected utility paradigm von Neumann and Morgenstern (1947) into question, led to the proposition of alternative and generalized utility functions, that intend to improve descriptive accuracy. The perhaps best known among those alternative preference theories, that has attracted much popularity among economists, is the so called Prospect Theory by Kahneman and Tversky (1979) and Tversky and Kahneman (1992). Its distinctive features, governed by its set of risk parameters such as risk sensitivity, loss aversion and decision weights, stimulated a series of economic and financial models that build on the previously estimated parameter values by Tversky and Kahneman (1992) to analyze and explain various empirical phenomena for which expected utility doesn't seem to offer a satisfying rationale. In this paper, after providing a brief overview of the relevant literature, we take a closer look at one of those papers, the trading model of Vlcek and Hens (2011) and analyze its implications on Prospect Theory parameters using an adopted maximum likelihood approach for a dataset of 656 individual investors from a large German discount brokerage firm. We find evidence that investors in our dataset are moderately averse to large losses and display high risk sensitivity, supporting the main assumptions of Prospect Theory.
Fiscal policies and household consumption during the COVID-19 pandemic: a review of early evidence
(2020)
We review early evidence on how household consumption behavior has evolved over the pandemic and how different groups of households have responded to fiscal stimulus programs. Due to the scarcity of evidence for Europe, our review focuses on evidence from the US. Notwithstanding the institutional and demographic differences, we highlight generalizable findings and challenges to the design of stimulus policies from the pandemic. In conclusion, we identify several open issues for dis cussion.
In diesem Beitrag wird ein Vorschlag vorgestellt, wie es trotz langfristiger Niedrigzinsen möglich ist, die vor 18 Jahren eingeführte Riester-Rente so umzugestalten, dass alle Beteiligten davon profitieren. Wird die Mindestauszahlung am Ende der Vertragslaufzeit nur für die Eigenbeiträge, nicht aber für die staatlichen Zulagen garantiert, können deutlich höhere Renditen erzielt werden. Unter dem Strich haben dann nicht nur Privatleute mehr Geld aus ihrer Altersvorsorge, sondern der Staat wird mehr Steuern einnehmen und die Anbieter haben mehr Spielraum für bedarfsgerechte Produktgestaltung.
We use minutes from 17,000 financial advisory sessions and corresponding client portfolio data to study how active client involvement affects advisor recommendations and portfolio outcomes. We find that advisors confronted with acquiescent clients stick to their standards and recommend expensive but well diversified mutual fund portfolios. However, if clients take an active role in the meetings, advisors deviate markedly from their standards, resulting in poorer portfolio diversification and lower Sharpe ratios. Our findings that advisors cater to client requests parallel the phenomenon of doctors prescribing antibiotics to insistent patients even if inappropriate, and imply that pandering diminishes the quality of advice.
Incentivized experiments in which individuals receive monetary rewards according to the outcomes of their decisions are regarded as the gold standard for preference elicitation in experimental economics. These task-related real payments are considered necessary to reveal subjects' "true preferences". Using a systematic, large-sample approach with three subject pools of private investors, professional investors, and students, we test the effect of task-related monetary incentives on risk preferences elicited in four standard experimental tasks. We find no systematic differences in behavior between subjects in the incentivized and non-incentivized regimes. We discuss implications for academic research and for applications in the field.
Microeconomic modeling of investors behavior in financial markets and its results crucially depends on assumptions about the mathematical shape of the underlying preference functions as well as their parameterizations. With the purpose to shed some light on the question, which preferences towards risky financial outcomes prevail in stock markets, we adopted and applied a maximum likelihood approach from the field of experimental economics on a randomly selected dataset of 656 private investors of a large German discount brokerage firm. According to our analysis we find evidence that the majority of these clients follow trading pattern in accordance with Prospect Theory (Kahneman and Tversky (1979)). We also find that observable sociodemographic and personal characteristics such as gender or age don't seem to correlate with specific preference types. With respect to the overall impact of preferences on trading behavior, we find a moderate impact of preferences on trading decisions of individual investors. A classification of investors according to various utility types reveals that the strength of the impact of preferences on an investors' rading behavior is not connected to most personal characteristics, but seems to be related to round-trip length.
Dieser Text fasst eine Studie zusammen, die für das Bundesministeriums für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz verfasst wurde und sich mit dem Kundennutzen von Anlageberatung auseinandersetzt. Das erhebliche Potenzial von interessenskongruenter Anlageberatung wird aufgezeigt und die aktuell geringe Leistungstransparenz im Markt kritisiert. Es wird empfohlen, ein standardisiertes Vokabular für Depotrisiken einzuführen und den Zugang aller Anleger zu leicht verständlichen und vergleichbaren Informationen zu historischem Depotrisiko und historischer Deporendite sicherzustellen. Die Studie fokussiert auf Wertpapierberatung und damit zuvorderst auf jene Teilmenge von Verbrauchern, die über Anlagevermögen verfügen. Die Grundideen zu Leistungstransparenz und standardisiertem Risikovokabular lassen sich jedoch auch z.B. auf den Alterssicherungsmarkt übertragen.