300 Sozialwissenschaften
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (995)
- Book (929)
- Part of Periodical (400)
- Contribution to a Periodical (374)
- Review (198)
- Part of a Book (163)
- Working Paper (133)
- Doctoral Thesis (124)
- Report (81)
- Conference Proceeding (18)
Language
Keywords
- Frauenarbeit (89)
- Arbeiterin (84)
- Adorno (56)
- Soziale Lage (56)
- Sozialdemokratische Frauenbewegung (53)
- Frauenfrage (51)
- Arbeitsbedingungen (48)
- Arbeiterinnenschutz (40)
- Mutterschutz (39)
- Lohn (37)
Institute
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (1180)
- Präsidium (465)
- Philosophie (415)
- Institut für Sozialforschung (IFS) (400)
- Institut für sozial-ökologische Forschung (ISOE) (116)
- Exzellenzcluster Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen (92)
- Erziehungswissenschaften (64)
- Geographie (55)
- Cornelia Goethe Centrum für Frauenstudien und die Erforschung der Geschlechterverhältnisse (CGC) (47)
- Geschichtswissenschaften (40)
During fieldwork, anthropologists are given many names that point to their intersectional placement regarding race, class, gender, nationality, and religion. Yet, careful consideration of vernacular forms of designation reveals that such generalizing categories do not always reflect the ways in which people are named and positioned in a given context. While acknowledging the relevance of intersectionality, this paper discusses the relationship between naming and social positionality through a comparative consideration of names employed to designate Dulley in Angola and Santos in Senegal. It explores how these designators, ascribed to the researchers by their interlocutors, contextually identify their positionality. Through concrete examples, it shows how this process of emplacement can both enable and restrict one's possibilities of action and experience.
Highlights
• We present a novel alternative to the die-in-the-cup experiment.
• Participants’ payoffs depend on their reported mothers’ birthdays.
• We find that subjects lied to obtain real monetary payoffs.
• The extent of lying is small and insensitive to several design variations.
Abstract
We ask a representative sample of German household decision-makers to enter their mother's birthday, with potential payments depending on the month and the day they state. Thus, we create an incentive to lie. Compared to the die-under-the-cup experiment, our alternative has a lower probability that the income-maximizing outcome is true. Furthermore, it is better suited for online surveys and samples in which gambling is socially stigmatized. We conduct different variations of this game to crystalize design recommendations for researchers interested in our tool. Participants lied to receive higher payoffs, but only with real monetary incentives and only to a relatively small extent. Our results are largely insensitive to several design elements that we vary, such as the probability of being paid and the magnitude of the payoffs.
Does political conflict with another country influence domestic consumers' daily consumption choices? We exploit the volatile US-China relations in 2018 and 2019 to analyze whether US consumers reduce their visits to Chinese restaurants when bilateral relations deteriorate. We measure the degree of political conflict through negativity in media reports and rely on smartphone location data to measure daily visits to over 190,000 US restaurants. A deterioration in US-China relations induces a significant decline in visits not only to Chinese but also to other foreign ethnic restaurants, while visits to typical American restaurants increase. We identify consumers' age, race, and cultural openness to moderate the strength of this ethnocentric effect.