330 Wirtschaft
Refine
Year of publication
- 2021 (218)
- 2014 (181)
- 2017 (173)
- 2020 (173)
- 2022 (167)
- 2018 (164)
- 2023 (155)
- 2016 (150)
- 2013 (145)
- 2015 (141)
- 2019 (133)
- 2012 (106)
- 2008 (100)
- 2005 (96)
- 2003 (95)
- 2009 (93)
- 2010 (92)
- 2011 (90)
- 2006 (82)
- 2004 (73)
- 2007 (68)
- 2024 (60)
- 2002 (45)
- 2001 (41)
- 1999 (35)
- 2000 (33)
- 1998 (31)
- 1997 (11)
- 1996 (10)
- 1993 (5)
- 1994 (4)
- 1995 (3)
- 1992 (2)
- 1892 (1)
- 1943 (1)
- 1946 (1)
- 1976 (1)
- 1990 (1)
- 1991 (1)
Document Type
- Working Paper (1834)
- Article (481)
- Part of Periodical (446)
- Report (105)
- Doctoral Thesis (40)
- Book (28)
- Conference Proceeding (14)
- Periodical (11)
- Part of a Book (9)
- Review (7)
Language
- English (2982) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2982)
Keywords
- Deutschland (117)
- Geldpolitik (55)
- USA (51)
- monetary policy (50)
- Financial Institutions (48)
- Schätzung (48)
- Europäische Union (44)
- Monetary Policy (44)
- ECB (42)
- Bank (39)
Institute
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (1869)
- Center for Financial Studies (CFS) (1483)
- Sustainable Architecture for Finance in Europe (SAFE) (1057)
- House of Finance (HoF) (698)
- E-Finance Lab e.V. (356)
- Institute for Monetary and Financial Stability (IMFS) (191)
- Rechtswissenschaft (89)
- Foundation of Law and Finance (50)
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (31)
- Institute for Law and Finance (ILF) (31)
Existing studies from the United States, Latin America, and Asia provide scant evidence that private schools dramatically improve academic performance relative to public schools. Using data from Kenya—a poor country with weak public institutions—we find a large effect of private schooling on test scores, equivalent to one full standard deviation. This finding is robust to endogenous sorting of more able pupils into private schools. The magnitude of the effect dwarfs the impact of any rigorously tested intervention to raise performance within public schools. Furthermore, nearly twothirds of private schools operate at lower cost than the median government school.
Causality is a widely-used concept in theoretical and empirical economics. The recent financial economics literature has used Granger causality to detect the presence of contemporaneous links between financial institutions and, in turn, to obtain a network structure. Subsequent studies combined the estimated networks with traditional pricing or risk measurement models to improve their fit to empirical data. In this paper, we provide two contributions: we show how to use a linear factor model as a device for estimating a combination of several networks that monitor the links across variables from different viewpoints; and we demonstrate that Granger causality should be combined with quantile-based causality when the focus is on risk propagation. The empirical evidence supports the latter claim.
The Asian financial crisis of 1997-98 was one of the most dramatic economic events of recent times, which raised many questions regarding the appropriate policy response to financial crises. This paper reviews the experience of this crisis, focusing on the overall strategy of crisis management and the way that strategy was implemented including, with regard to official and private financing, structural reforms, and monetary and fiscal policies.
The spreading of the Covid-19 virus causes a reduction in economic activity worldwide and may lead to new risks to financial stability. The authors draw attention to the urgency of the targeted mitigation strategies on the European level and suggest taking coordinated action on the fiscal side to provide liquidity to affected firms in the corporate sector. Otherwise, virus-related cashflow interruptions could lead to a new full-blown banking crisis. Monetary policy measures are unlikely to mitigate cash liquidity shortages at the level of individual firms. Coordinated action at European level is decisive to prevent markets from losing confidence in the resilience of banks, particularly in countries with limited fiscal capacity. In contrast to the euro crisis of 2011, the cause of the current crisis does not lie in the financial markets; therefore, the risk of moral hazard for banks or states is low.
This Policy Letter presents a proposal for designing a program of government assistance for firms hurt by the Coronavirus crisis in the European Union (EU). In our recent Policy Letter 81, we introduced a new, equity-type instrument, a cash-against-tax surcharge scheme, bundled across firms and countries in a European Pandemic Equity Fund (EPEF). The present Policy Letter 84 focuses on the principles and conditions relevant for the operationalization of a EPEF. Our proposal has several desirable features. It: a) offers better risk sharing opportunities, augmenting the resilience of businesses and EU economies; b) is need-based, thereby contributing to an effective use of resources; c) builds on conditions and credible controls, addressing adverse selection and moral hazard; d) is accessible to smaller and medium-sized firms, the backbone of Europe’s economy; e) applies Europe-wide uniform eligibility criteria, strengthening support among member states; f) is a scheme of limited duration, reducing (perceived) government interference in businesses; g) creates a template for a growth-oriented public policy, aligning public and private sector interests; and h) builds on the existing institutional infrastructure and requires minimal legislative adjustments.
This policy letter adds to the current discussion on how to design a program of government assistance for firms hurt by the Coronavirus crisis. While not pretending to provide a cure-all proposal, the advocated scheme could help to bring funding to firms, even small firms, quickly, without increasing their leverage and default risk. The plan combines outright cash transfers to firms with a temporary, elevated corporate profit tax at the firm level as a form of conditional payback. The implied equity-like payment structure has positive risk-sharing features for firms, without impinging on ownership structures. The proposal has to be implemented at the pan-European level to strengthen Euro area resilience.
With the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic in full swing, banks face a challenging environment. They will need to address disappointing results and adverse balance sheet restatements, the intensity of which depends on the evolution of the euro area economies. At the same time, vulnerable banks reinforce real economy deficiencies. The contribution of this paper is to provide a comparative assessment of the various policy responses to address a looming banking crisis. Such a crisis will fully materialize when non-performing assets drag down banks simultaneously, raising the specter of a full-blown systemic crisis. The policy responses available range from forbearance, recapitalization (with public or private resources), asset separation (bad banks, at national or EU level), to debt conversion schemes. We evaluate these responses according to a set of five criteria that define the efficacy of each. These responses are not mutually exclusive, in practice, as they have never been. They may also go hand in hand with other restructuring initiatives, including potential consolidation in the banking sector. Although we do not make a specific recommendation, we provide a framework for policymakers to guide them in their decision making.