340 Recht
Refine
Year of publication
- 2015 (82) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (28)
- Working Paper (28)
- Review (11)
- Contribution to a Periodical (5)
- Book (4)
- Part of Periodical (4)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Report (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (82)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (82)
Keywords
- climate change (3)
- Digitalisierung (2)
- Internet (2)
- Netzneutralität (2)
- Remix (2)
- Urheberrecht (2)
- copyright (2)
- digital rights management (2)
- intergenerational justice (2)
- internet (2)
Institute
- Rechtswissenschaft (44)
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (14)
- Exzellenzcluster Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen (10)
- Präsidium (7)
- Sustainable Architecture for Finance in Europe (SAFE) (7)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (7)
- Center for Financial Studies (CFS) (5)
- LOEWE-Schwerpunkt Außergerichtliche und gerichtliche Konfliktlösung (4)
- Institute for Law and Finance (ILF) (3)
- Institute for Monetary and Financial Stability (IMFS) (3)
Flüchtlinge, Schuldenkrise, Diskriminierung. Drei hochaktuelle, weltumspannende Themen, die eines verbindet: die Frage nach Gerechtigkeit. An der Goethe-Universität denkt die Forschergruppe »Justitia Amplificata: Erweiterte Gerechtigkeit – konkret und global« über Gerechtigkeitstheorien nach. Die Gruppe untersucht Theorien der Gerechtigkeit und ihre praktischen Implikationen. Die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft fördert die Arbeit der interdisziplinärangelegten Kolleg- Forschergruppe. Diese vernetzt Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler unterschiedlicher Karrierestufen.
The Romanian National Archives in Sibiu keep a wide range of documents concerning the history of the Transylvanian Saxons and the every day life of the city of Sibiu. Although of major interest for historians, linguists and translators, these documents have not been fully studied so far. They represent valuable evidence of the evolution of the former German language spoken on the Transylvanian territory and, if translated into Romanian, could offer to the Romanian reader a new perspective on the Transylvanian Saxons’ history. This paper analyses, in the historic context of the time, the depositions of witnesses in a civil trial during the Austrian billeting in Sibiu in the 17th century and discusses the contents by observing the main structural characteristics of the text.
The analyzed and translated text represents a judicial protocol of a witch trial from 1697. After a brief description of the general phenomenon of the witch hunt and it’s characteristics in 17th century Transylvania the text is discussed from a point of view of its translation. The most problematic aspects are found in the depositions of the witnesses, which abound in linguistic peculiarities, ranging from archaic structures to dialect. The translator faces a dilemma when having to decide whether to translate the archaic structures into archaic ones, thus preserving the stylistic personality of the text, or into modern Romanian, which would mean creating an “open translation”. In any case the translation should not neglect the informative and oral character of the source text.
This paper explores the context and reasons for the extensive translation of legal texts from German into Romanian in Bukovina during the Habsburg period (1775–1918) and immediately following the unification with the Romanian Kingdom. The Austrian civil code from 1811 was translated in the three important periods of translation, corresponding to the major administrative changes in the province. The paper analyses the different translations and their impact on the Romanian legislation, legal terminology and juridical style.
Lernen im fiktiven Strafprozess : Jura-Studierende der Goethe-Uni nehmen an »Moot Court« teil
(2015)
Unter der Leitung von Prof. Dr. Matthias Jahn (Goethe-Universität und im zweiten Hauptamt Richter am OLG Frankfurt) sowie des Rechtsanwalts und wissenschaftlichen Mitarbeiters des Lehrstuhls, Fabian Meinecke, hatten Frankfurter Studierende erstmals die Gelegenheit, selbst in die Robe eines Staatsanwalts oder Strafverteidigers zu schlüpfen – und das ist wörtlich zu verstehen. Marcel Behrendt und Bastian Schmack berichten von ihren Erfahrungen.
Few African countries provide for an explicit right to a nationality. Laws and practices governing citizenship effectively leave hundreds of thousands of people in Africa without a country. These stateless Africans can neither vote nor stand for office; they cannot enrol their children in school, travel freely, or own property; they cannot work for the government; they are exposed to human rights abuses. Statelessness exacerbates and underlies tensions in many regions of the continent. Citizenship Law in Africa, a comparative study by two programs of the Open Society Foundations, describes the often arbitrary, discriminatory, and contradictory citizenship laws that exist from state to state and recommends ways that African countries can bring their citizenship laws in line with international rights norms. The report covers topics such as citizenship by descent, citizenship by naturalisation, gender discrimination in citizenship law, dual citizenship, and the right to identity documents and passports. It is essential reading for policymakers, attorneys, and activists. This third edition is a comprehensive revision of the original text, which is also updated to reflect developments at national and continental levels. The original tables presenting comparative analysis of all the continent's nationality laws have been improved, and new tables added on additional aspects of the law. Since the second edition was published in 2010, South Sudan has become independent and adopted its own nationality law, while there have been revisions to the laws in Côte d'Ivoire, Kenya, Libya, Mali, Mauritania, Namibia, Niger, Senegal, Seychelles, South Africa, Sudan, Tunisia and Zimbabwe. The African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights and the African Committee of Experts on the Rights and Welfare of the Child have developed important new normative guidance.
Labour law in Zimbabwe
(2015)