340 Recht
Refine
Year of publication
- 2019 (87) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (46)
- Review (22)
- Doctoral Thesis (6)
- Contribution to a Periodical (5)
- Part of Periodical (4)
- Book (3)
- Working Paper (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (87)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (87)
Keywords
- Konstitutionalisierung (3)
- constitutionnalisation (3)
- Catherine Lu (2)
- Citizenship (2)
- Deprivation of Citizenship (2)
- Grundgesetz (2)
- Meinungsfreiheit (2)
- Parität (2)
- Refugee Protection (2)
- Religionsfreiheit (2)
Institute
- Rechtswissenschaft (53)
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (16)
- Präsidium (12)
- Exzellenzcluster Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen (9)
- Philosophie (3)
- Geschichtswissenschaften (2)
- Institut für Wirtschaft, Arbeit, und Kultur (IWAK) (2)
- Cornelia Goethe Centrum für Frauenstudien und die Erforschung der Geschlechterverhältnisse (CGC) (1)
- Institute for Law and Finance (ILF) (1)
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Ostasienstudien (IZO) (1)
This article examines whether restrictions on access to welfare rights for EU immigrants are justifiable on grounds of reciprocity. Recently political theorists have supported some robust restrictions on the basis of fairness. They argue that if EU immigrants do not immediately contribute sufficiently to the provision of basic collective goods in the host state, restrictions on their access to the welfare state are justified. I argue that these accounts of the principle of reciprocity rely on an ambiguous conception of contribution that cannot deliver the restrictions it advocates. Several strategies open to those advocating reciprocity-based restrictions are considered and found wanting. This article defends that verdict from a number of objections.
GLC Newsletter 02/2019
(2019)
This paper addresses the phenomenon of climate-induced displacement. I argue that there is scope for an account of asylum as compensation owed to those displaced by the impacts of climate change which needs only to appeal to minimal normative commitments about the requirements of global justice. I demonstrate the possibility of such an approach through an examination of the work of David Miller. Miller is taken as an exemplar of a broadly ‘international libertarian’ approach to global justice, and his work is a useful vehicle for this project because he has an established view about both responsibility for climate change and about the state’s right to exclude would-be immigrants. In the course of the argument, I set out the relevant aspects of Miller’s views, reconstruct an account of responsibility for the harms faced by climate migrants which is consistent with Miller’s views, and demonstrate why such an account yields an obligation to provide asylum as a form of compensation to ‘climate migrants.’