410 Linguistik
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (34)
- Working Paper (9)
- Article (6)
- Review (2)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (52)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (52)
Keywords
- Semantik (52) (remove)
Institute
This paper deals with German kinship terms ending with the form "n" (Muttern, Vatern). Firstly, data from newspapers are presented that show that especially Muttern denotes very special meanings that can only be derived to a limited extent from the lexical base: a) Muttern referring to a home where mother cares for you, b) Muttern standing for overprotection, and c) Muttern representing a special food style (often embedded in prepositional phrases and/or comparative constructions like wie bei or wie von Muttern). Secondly, it is argued that the addition of n to kinship terms is not a word-formation pattern, but that these word forms are instead lexicalized and idiomatized in contemporary German. Hence, a diachronic scenario is applied to account for the data. It is argued in the present paper that the n-forms have been borrowed from Low German dialects, especially from constructional idioms of the type ‘X-wie bei Muttern’ and that forms were enriched by semantic concepts associated with the dialect.
The paper explores factors that influence the distribution of constituent words of compounds over the head and modifier position. The empirical basis for the study is a large database of German compounds, annotated with respect to the morphological structure of the compound and the semantic category of the constituents. The study shows that the polysemy of the constituent word, its constituent family size, and its semantic category account for tendencies of the constituent word to occur in either modifier or head position. Furthermore, the paper explores the degree to which the semantic category combination of head and modifier word, e.g., x=substance and y=artifact, indicates the semantic relation between the constituents, e.g., y_consists_of_x.
French suffixations in -age, -ion and -ment are considered roughly equivalent, yet some differences have been pointed out regarding the semantics of the resulting nominalizations. In this study, we confirm the existence of a semantic distinction between them on the basis of a large scale distributional analysis. We show that the distinction is partially determined by the degree of technicality of the denoted action: -age nominals tend to be more technical than -ion ones. We examine this hypothesis through the statistical modeling of technicality. To this end, we propose a linguistic definition of technicality, which we implement using empirical, quantitative criteria estimated in corpora and lexical resources. We show to what extent the differences with respect to these criteria adequately approximate technicality. Our study indicates that this definition of technicality, while amendable, provides new perspectives for the characterization of action nouns.
Die vorliegende Studie setzt sich mit dem Adjektiv "neu" und seinem slowakischen Äquivalent "nový" systembezogen und pragmatisch auseinander. Wir befassen uns kontrastiv mit der Bedeutungsstruktur, mit der Kollokabilität und lexikographischen Auffassung dieser Adjektive. Um alle erwähnten Ebenen in ihrer Komplexität zu erfassen, darf man sie nicht voneinander getrennt untersuchen. Bei unserer Untersuchung gehen wir von der kodifizierten Bedeutung aus, die wir mit der realen Sprachverwendung vergleichen und ihre Anwendbarkeit an der aus den Korpora gewonnenen Daten überprüfen. Bei unserer kontrastiven Vorhegensweise ist der Ausgangspunkt die Auslegung der slowakischen Bedeutungsbeschreibung der lexikalischen Einheit "nový". Zunächst erweitert sich der Forschungsgegenstand um den Vergleich der jeweiligen Erläuterungen der deutschen lexikalischen Einheit "neu" in verschiedenen deutschen Wörterbüchern. Im Anschluss an die semantische Analyse der einzelnen Adjektive in den zwei von uns ausgewählten Sprachen überprüfen wir, ob und inwiefern bei der Bedeutungsbeschreibung der Übersetzungsäquivalente "nový" und "neu" eine analogische Auslegung verwendbar ist.
Der Aufsatz beschäftigt sich mit der Frage, ob im gegenwärtigen deutschen Sprachgebrauch ein übermäßiger Gebrauch von Anglizismen zu beobachten ist. Als entscheidender linguistischer Grund für die häufige Verwendung von Anglizismen wird ihre Eurysemie (semantische Vagheit) angesehen. Der digitale Wandel der Medienbranche wird als außerlinguistischer Faktor betrachtet. Diese Fragen werden im Rahmen einer Studie zur Semantik der in elektronischen und in Print-Medien am häufigsten verwendeten Anglizismen behandelt.
Decomposing coordination
(2014)
Natural languages display a surprising diversity of expression of elementary logical operations. The study of this variation is emerging as an important topic of cross-linguistic semantics. In this paper, we address the expression of coordination from this perspective, especially coordination of individual denoting expressions such as "John and Mary". We argue that there is an underlying universal structure for individual coordination, and that the cross-linguistic variation can be explained by assuming that languages pronounce different morphemes of this universal structure. In particular, we argue that there two main types of system for the expression of individual coordination: the J-type and the μ-type. In μ-type languages the morpheme used for individual coordination also has uses a quantificational or focus particle, while in the J-type languages it doesn't. Instead at least in many J-type languages the same morpheme is used for individual and propositional coordination. The evidence we present for our model comes from two sources: new data from specific data of the J-type and μ-type languages, and from a study of the historical development of the expression of individual coordination in Indo-European which switched from a μ-type to a J-type system.
The late physicist Carl Sagan, whom I quote in the first part of my title, skillfully phrased the common sense view on evidence in the mature sciences. In linguistics, however, evidence has become a controversial issue, especially so when it comes to the investigation of less well studied languages. In this paper, I argue that Sagan's principle should be applied to linguistics. The growing accessibility of a wide array of experimental techniques and computational tools to analyze such data makes it feasible to back up extraordinary claims with evidence from a variety of sources. At the same time, it is in many cases possible to agree on what constitutes an ordinary claim and focus the extra effort on extraordinary claims. For non-controversial claims no more than the minimum effort to establish the claim and properly document the evidence is necessary.
Irene Heim in unpublished work proposed a new syntax-semantics interface for propositional attitude reports based on an ontology without transworld individuals, but counterpart functions instead. We show that the approach can capture the 'de re'/'de dicto' distinction, but makes different predictions from accounts with transworld individuals. Specifically, the account uses a non-invertible counterpart functions: a single individual in an alternative world can be the counterpart of many individuals of the real world. The directionality of counterpart functions predicts that a 'de dicto' interpreted DP cannot be an argument of a 'de re' interpreted predicate. We show that the predicted restriction is corroborated by existing work on restrictions on 'de re' interpretation. The derivation of constraints on 'de re' interpretation argues empirically for the counterpart ontology and Heim’s implementation thereof.
The paper presents an additional argument for a specific account of semantic binding: the flat-binding analysis. The argument is based on observations concerning sloppy interpretations in verb phrase ellipsis when the binder is not the subject of the elided VP. In one such case, it is important that one of the binders belong to the domain of the other. This case can be derived from the flat-binding analysis as is shown in the paper, while it is unclear how to account for it within other analyses of semantic binding.
This paper addresses the syntax and semantics plurals, and then applies it to reciprocal expressions. In the course of this investigation, I address two problems for the conventional view that a reciprocal makes essentially the same semantic contribution to the sentence as other noun phrases, but has an interesting internal structure. I will show that both problems are properties of plurality in general, and can be successfully explained along these lines. As a result, the paper is more about plurality in general than reciprocals though the goal of the paper is to account for the two problems relating to reciprocals.