G11 Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
Refine
Document Type
- Working Paper (22)
- Article (5)
Language
- English (27)
Has Fulltext
- yes (27)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (27)
Keywords
- 401(k) plan (2)
- Annuity (2)
- Asset Allocation (2)
- Financial Stability (2)
- Greenwashing (2)
- Household finance (2)
- Insurance (2)
- Life cycle saving (2)
- Portfolio optimization (2)
- Retirement (2)
- Speculation (2)
- Sustainable Finance (2)
- Aging Society (1)
- Alterungsgesellschaft (1)
- Annuities (1)
- Art investment (1)
- Asset Concentration Risk (1)
- Belief Formation (1)
- Blockchain (1)
- Corporate Name Change (1)
- Corporate Social Responsibility (1)
- Covid-19 (1)
- Disposition Effect (1)
- ESG (1)
- ESG Investing (1)
- ESG ratings (1)
- Environmental (1)
- Ethereum (1)
- Eurosystem collateral eligibility (1)
- Exchange rate volatility (1)
- Experimental Finance (1)
- Field Experiment (1)
- Financial Advice (1)
- Financial Crisis (1)
- Financial openness (1)
- Fund Flows (1)
- Fundamental Value (1)
- Gambling (1)
- Governance (1)
- Green bonds (1)
- Greenium (1)
- Higher Moments of Return (1)
- Household Finance (1)
- Idiosyncratic Risk (1)
- Inflation (1)
- Investment Styles (1)
- Investment funds (1)
- Investor education (1)
- Lebensversicherung (1)
- Life Insurance (1)
- Life insurance companies (1)
- Longevity risk (1)
- Lottery stocks (1)
- MIFID (1)
- Machine Learning (1)
- Mental models (1)
- Microprudential Insurance Regulation (1)
- Mikroprudenzielle Versicherungsregulierung (1)
- NAV-price-spread (1)
- Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) (1)
- Open-end real estate funds (1)
- Original sin (1)
- Performance (1)
- Portfolio Management (1)
- Realization Utility (1)
- Renten (1)
- Retail Investor (1)
- Retail investors (1)
- Retirement Welfare (1)
- Risk aggregation (1)
- Ruhestand (1)
- SFDR (1)
- Secondary market (1)
- Sectoral Asset Diversification (1)
- Selling Behavior (1)
- Shareholder Letters (1)
- Social (1)
- Social Impact (1)
- Socially responsible investments (1)
- Solvency regulation (1)
- Sustainability (1)
- Sustainable Investments (1)
- Sustainable finance literacy (1)
- Systematic Risk (1)
- Tail correlation (1)
- Tax policy (1)
- Textual Analysis (1)
- Tontines (1)
- Trading (1)
- Trading restrictions (1)
- Vermögensaufteilung (1)
- Vermögenskonzentrationsrisiko (1)
- Wohlfahrt (1)
- annuity (1)
- behavioral finance (1)
- betting (1)
- corporate bonds (1)
- dash-for-cash (1)
- delayed claiming (1)
- digital planning tool (1)
- dividends (1)
- educational intervention (1)
- free dividend fallacy (1)
- household finance (1)
- idiosynkratisches Risiko (1)
- labor supply (1)
- lifecycle saving (1)
- longevity (1)
- lump sum (1)
- portfolio management (1)
- retirement age (1)
- retirement plan (1)
- retirement planning (1)
- return expectations (1)
- risk preference (1)
- saving behavior (1)
- sektorale Vermögensdiversifizierung (1)
- social impact (1)
- social security (1)
- stock market investment (1)
- sustainable investments (1)
- systematisches Risiko (1)
- tax arbitrage (1)
- venture capital (1)
Socially responsible investing (SRI) continues to gain momentum in the financial market space for various reasons, starting with the looming effect of climate change and the drive toward a net-zero economy. Existing SRI approaches have included environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria as a further dimension to portfolio selection, but these approaches focus on classical investors and do not account for specific aspects of insurance companies. In this paper, we consider the stock selection problem of life insurance companies. In addition to stock risk, our model set-up includes other important market risk categories of insurers, namely interest rate risk and credit risk. In line with common standards in insurance solvency regulation, such as Solvency II, we measure risk using the solvency ratio, i.e. the ratio of the insurer’s market-based equity capital to the Value-at-Risk of all modeled risk categories. As a consequence, we employ a modification of Markowitz’s Portfolio Selection Theory by choosing the “solvency ratio” as a downside risk measure to obtain a feasible set of optimal portfolios in a three-dimensional (risk, return, and ESG) capital allocation plane. We find that for a given solvency ratio, stock portfolios with a moderate ESG level can lead to a higher expected return than those with a low ESG level. A highly ambitious ESG level, however, reduces the expected return. Because of the specific nature of a life insurer’s business model, the impact of the ESG level on the expected return of life insurers can substantially differ from the corresponding impact for classical investors.
Tail-correlation matrices are an important tool for aggregating risk measurements across risk categories, asset classes and/or business segments. This paper demonstrates that traditional tail-correlation matrices—which are conventionally assumed to have ones on the diagonal—can lead to substantial biases of the aggregate risk measurement’s sensitivities with respect to risk exposures. Due to these biases, decision-makers receive an odd view of the effects of portfolio changes and may be unable to identify the optimal portfolio from a risk-return perspective. To overcome these issues, we introduce the “sensitivity-implied tail-correlation matrix”. The proposed tail-correlation matrix allows for a simple deterministic risk aggregation approach which reasonably approximates the true aggregate risk measurement according to the complete multivariate risk distribution. Numerical examples demonstrate that our approach is a better basis for portfolio optimization than the Value-at-Risk implied tail-correlation matrix, especially if the calibration portfolio (or current portfolio) deviates from the optimal portfolio.
Historical evidence like the global financial crisis from 2007-09 highlights that sector concentration risk can play an important role for the solvency of insurers. However, current microprudential frameworks like the US RBC framework and Solvency II consider only name concentration risk explicitly in their solvency capital requirements for asset concentration risk and neglect sector concentration risk. We show by means of US insurers’ asset holdings from 2009 to 2018 that substantial sectoral asset concentrations exist in the financial, public and real estate sector, and find indicative evidence for a sectoral search for yield behavior. Based on a theoretical solvency capital allocation scheme, we demonstrate that the current regulatory approaches can lead to inappropriate and biased levels of solvency capital for asset concentration risk, and should be revised. Our findings have also important implications on the ongoing discussion of asset concentration risk in the context of macroprudential insurance regulation.
We have designed and implemented an experimental module in the 2014 Health and Retirement Study to measure older persons' willingness to defer claiming of Social Security benefits. Under the current system’ status quo where delaying claiming boosts eventual benefits, we show that 46% of the respondents would delay claiming and work longer. If respondents were instead offered an actuarially fair lump sum payment instead of higher lifelong benefits, about 56% indicate they would delay claiming. Without a work requirement, the average amount needed to induce delayed claiming is only $60,400, while when part-time work is stipulated, the amount is slightly higher, $66,700. This small difference implies a low utility value of leisure foregone, of under 20% of average household income.
The US Treasury recently permitted deferred longevity income annuities to be included in pension plan menus as a default payout solution, yet little research has investigated whether more people should convert some of the $18 trillion they hold in employer-based defined contribution plans into lifelong income streams. We investigate this innovation using a calibrated lifecycle consumption and portfolio choice model embodying realistic institutional considerations. Our welfare analysis shows that defaulting a modest portion of retirees’ 401(k) assets (over a threshold) is an attractive way to enhance retirement security, enhancing welfare by up to 20% of retiree plan accruals.
Shares of open-end real estate funds are typically traded directly between the investor and the fund management company. However, we provide empirical evidence for the growth of secondary market activities, i.e., the trading of shares on stock exchanges. We find high trading levels in situations where the fund management company suspends the issue or redemption of shares. Shares trade at a discount when the fund management company suspends the redemption, whereas shares trade at a premium when the fund management company suspends the issue. We also find evidence that secondary market trading activity is increasing since German regulation introduced a minimum holding period and a mandatory notice period for open-end real estate funds.
The modern tontine: an innovative instrument for longevity risk management in an aging society
(2016)
The changing social, financial and regulatory frameworks, such as an increasingly aging society, the current low interest rate environment, as well as the implementation of Solvency II, lead to the search for new product forms for private pension provision. In order to address the various issues, these product forms should reduce or avoid investment guarantees and risks stemming from longevity, still provide reliable insurance benefits and simultaneously take account of the increasing financial resources required for very high ages. In this context, we examine whether a historical concept of insurance, the tontine, entails enough innovative potential to extend and improve the prevailing privately funded pension solutions in a modern way. The tontine basically generates an age-increasing cash flow, which can help to match the increasing financing needs at old ages. However, the tontine generates volatile cash flows, so that - especially in the context of an aging society - the insurance character of the tontine cannot be guaranteed in every situation. We show that partial tontinization of retirement wealth can serve as a reliable supplement to existing pension products.