791 Öffentliche Darbietungen, Film, Rundfunk
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (14)
- Doctoral Thesis (11)
- magisterthesis (7)
- Magister's Thesis (5)
- Contribution to a Periodical (4)
- Review (3)
- Book (2)
- Part of a Book (1)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (48)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (48) (remove)
Keywords
- Film (3)
- Contact-sheets (2)
- Direct Cinema (2)
- Dokumentarfilm (2)
- Dokumentarfilme (2)
- Filmgespräche (2)
- Gisela Tuchtenhagen (2)
- Klaus Wildenhahn (2)
- Rezeption (2)
- Richard Leacock (2)
Institute
- Neuere Philologien (48) (remove)
Einst war eine Filmvorführung ein flüchtiges Ereignis, das außer schönen Erinnerungen im Gedächtnis des Publikums keine Spuren hinterließ. Heute, im Zeitalter des Streaming, setzt jeder Film einen digitalen Fußabdruck im Reich der Daten. Und nicht nur das: Der Film selbst hat sich mit der digitalen Transformation grundlegend verändert und neue Formen und Formate entwickelt. Diese Umbrüche stellen das kleine Fach Filmwissenschaft vor große Herausforderungen – und bieten zugleich neue Chancen für Forschung und Lehre. In den kommenden fünf Jahren wird ein Team aus Filmwissenschaftlerinnen und Filmwissenschaftlern der Universitäten Marburg, Mainz und Frankfurt im »Digital Cinema-Hub« (DiCi-Hub) erforschen, wie diesen Herausforderungen und Chancen begegnet werden kann. Das Projekt wird von der VolkswagenStiftung im Rahmen der Förderlinie »Weltwissen – Strukturelle Stärkung Kleiner Fächer« mit 1 Million Euro gefördert.
DiCi-Hub stellt drei Schlüsselbereiche der Filmkultur ins Zentrum – nämlich Netzwerke (Philipps-Universität Marburg), Formate (Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz) und Märkte (Goethe-Universität Frankfurt).
Der UniReport hatte die Gelegenheit, dem Filmwissenschaftler Prof. Vinzenz Hediger, der an der Goethe-Universität den Schlüsselbereich »Märkte« verantworten wird, einige Fragen zu stellen.
»Landkarte des Holocaust«
(2020)
Im Rahmen des Holocaust-Gedenktages wurde an der Goethe-Universität der Film »Back to Berlin. Better by bike than by train« von Catherine Lurie aufgeführt. Die Dokumentation aus dem Jahre 2018 zeigt die Reise elf jüdischer Motorradfahrer von Tel Aviv nach Berlin, wo 2015 die erste Makkabiade, ähnlich der Olympischen Spiele, in Deutschland seit dem Zweiten Weltkrieg stattfand. Die deutsche Erstaufführung der Doku wurde realisiert in Kooperation mit Nicole Faktor, Vorstand der WIZO (Women´s International Zionist Organization)-Gruppe Frankfurt. Vinzenz Hediger, Filmwissenschaftler an der Goethe-Universität, erläutert den Hintergrund des Films.
The question of 'Fantastic motion' is whether films in the 1910s and 1920s should be viewed as merely the forerunners of patriarchal cinema, which some colleagues believe, or whether they offered - and still offer - alternatives to a female audience. The author makes a case for the latter possibility and searches for explanations for the enjoyable and liberating sensations they, as women, experienced while becoming acquainted with early film. Using a historical and contextual approach, Schlüpmann investigates genres including non-fiction, comedy and romantic drama from the early 1910s, and describes how the significance of notions such as the beauty of nature, the culture of humour and love could have been adopted into the perception of women filmgoers at the time.
El objetivo de este artículo es el de mostrar el posible papel de los escritos de Nietzsche en la teoría del cine. La filosofía de Nietzsche se presenta en el contexto de la biografía de la autora, como una experiencia personal que, junto con el feminismo, influye en su vida y en su pensamiento. En el artículo se exponen la relación entre la obra de Nietzsche y el nacimiento del cine y la utilidad de estas obras para una teoría contemporánea del cine en el contexto de la sociedad actual.
Ascribing to the premise that film festivals are crucial to the production of cultural memory, this article explores different parameters through which festivals shape our reception of films. In its focus on the Asian American film festival CAAMFest, the article reveals that festivals are part of a complex network of actors whose different agendas influence the narratives produced around the film, direct its role as memory object and encourage memories to travel. What is more, it shows that festival locations—from the city in which a festival takes place to the concrete venue in which a film is screened—play a significant role in shaping our experience and understanding of films. Finally, it establishes that festivals create frames for their films, constructed through and circulated by the various festival media and live performances at the festival events. Bringing together film festival studies and memory studies, the article makes use of an interdisciplinary approach with which to explore the film festival phenomenon, thus shedding light on the complex dynamics of acts of framing, locations and networks of actors shaping the festival’s memory production. It also draws attention to the understudied phenomenon of Asian American film festivals, showing how such a festival may actively engage in constructing and performing a minority group’s collective identity and memory.
This commentary on Edwin Carels’ essay “Revisiting Tom Tom: Performative anamnesis and autonomous vision in Ken Jacobs’ appropriations of Tom Tom the Piper’s Son” broadens up the media-archaeological framework in which Carels places his text. Notions such as Huhtamo’s topos and Zielinski’s “deep time” are brought into the discussion in order to point out the difficulty to see what there is to see and to question the position of the viewer in front of experimental films like Tom Tom the Piper’s Son and its remakes.
Whiteout: animal traces in Werner Herzog’s Grizzly man and encounters at the end of the world
(2017)
Literary animal studies are confronted with a systematic question: How can writing, as a human-made sign system, represent the nonhuman animal as an autonomous agent without falling back into the pitfalls of anthropomorphism? Against the backdrop of this problem, this paper asks how the medium of film allows for a different representation of the animal and analyzes two of Werner Herzog’s later documentary films. Although the depiction of animals and landscapes has always played a significant part in Herzog’s films, critical assessments of his work—including those of Herzog himself—tended to view the role of nature imagery as purely allegorical: it expresses the inner nature, the inner landscapes of the film’s human protagonists. This paper tries to open up a different view. It argues that both Grizzly Man and Encounters at the End of the World develop an aesthetic that depicts nonhuman nature as an autonomous and lively presence. In the close proximity amongst camera, human, and nonhuman agents, a clear distinction between nature and culture is increasingly blurred.