850 Italienische, rumänische, rätoromanische Literaturen
Refine
Document Type
- Part of a Book (5)
- Article (4)
- Part of Periodical (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (10)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (10)
Keywords
- Rezeption (10) (remove)
Der vorliegende Beitrag konzentriert sich nicht auf die interessanten, etwas späteren Vorbilder einer italienischen 'hybriden' Rezeption des Gotischen bzw. Phantastischen, die gleichzeitig einer neuen Sensibilität bzw. Ästhetik den Weg ebnete und die das Interesse der Forschung schon erweckte, sondern er verfolgt das Ziel, die weniger erforschten Wurzeln des Genres in Italien zu ergründen. Diese sind unerwartet in 'Fermo e Lucia', d.h. in jener unvollkommenen ersten bzw. 'Ur'-Fassung von Manzonis Prosameisterstück 'I promessi sposi' zu finden.
Transforming a text - narrative or poetic - into a play, made of dialogues and organized into scenes, has been one of the most frequent forms of literary transcodification both in the past and in the present. We can find examples of this procedure at the very origins of Italian theatre, which indeed began as the rewriting of earlier texts, both in the "sacre rappresentazioni" and in the profane field: the Bible in the first case and the Ovidian mythologies in the second. Poliziano's "Fabula d'Orfeo" and "Cefalo e Procri" by Niccolò da Correggio are the first well-known examples of this process. Thus, the metamorphosis of a text into a dramatization has many models in the history of theatre and literature. It would be of great interest to start with an overview of the different types, aims, and forms of transcodification of texts that are enacted in order to create dramatizations capable of being performed on stage. Erminia Ardissino attempts to offer an introduction to her study of Giovanni Giudici's play about Dante's "Paradiso" with a brief discussion of three different practices of theatrical transcodification. She looks at three pièces written at the request of the Italian scenographer Federico Tiezzi between 1989 and 1990 as stage productions of the three cantiche of the Divine Comedy. Although they belong to the same project, are inspired by the same person, and share a unified aim, the three pièces created by Edoardo Sanguineti, Mario Luzi, and Giovanni Giudici show three different approaches to the task of transcodifying a text in order to produce a drama - the task, in Genette's words, of creating a theatrical palimpsest.
'Dante and Ireland', or 'Dante and Irish Writers', is an extremely vast topic, and to cover it a book rather than an essay would be necessary. If the relationship between the poet and Ireland did not begin in the fourteenth century - when Dante himself may have had some knowledge of, and been inspired by, the "Vision of Adamnán", the "Vision of Tungdal", and the "Tractatus de purgatorio Sancti Patricii" - the story certainly had started by the eighteenth, when the Irish man of letters Henry Boyd was the first to produce a complete English translation of the "Comedy", published in 1802. Even if one restricts the field to twentieth-century literature alone, which is the aim in the present piece, the list of authors who are influenced by Dante includes Yeats, Joyce, Beckett, and Heaney - that is to say, four of the major writers not only of Ireland, but of Europe and the entire West. To these should then be added other Irish poets of the first magnitude, such as Louis MacNeice, Ciaran Carson, Eiléan Ní Cuilleanáin, and Thomas Kinsella. Therefore Piero Boitani treats this theme in a somewhat cursory manner, privileging the episodes he considers most relevant and the themes which he thinks form a coherent and intricate pattern of literary history, where every author is not only metamorphosing Dante but also rewriting his predecessor, or predecessors, who had rewritten Dante. Distinct from the English and American Dante of Pound and Eliot, an 'Irish Dante', whom Joyce was to call 'ersed irredent', slowly grows out of this pattern.
Between 1816 and 1821, the philologist François Raynouard (1761–1836) published a "Choix des poésies originales des troubadours". His connections with Madame de Staël's cultural circle at Coppet determined the construction of the myth of courtly love as a forerunner of Romantic love. [...] Acording to this cultural tradition, Dante is an intermediate (although pre-eminent) step in the history of Western desire, a process begun in medieval Provence and revitalized by European Romanticism. When Lacan approaches Dante, it is therefore one Dante - this Dante - that he is approaching. The present essay, in which Fabio Camilletti analyses three tightly interwoven texts, explores some of the reverberations of this encounter. In 1958, Lacan published in "Critique" an article entitled 'La jeunesse d'André Gide, ou la lettre et le désir'. This text, later included in Lacan's "Écrits", was meant to be a review of a biography of the young Gide published in 1956 by Jean Delay, entitled "La jeunesse d'André Gide". In comparing Gide's life with his works of youth, Delay notably focused on Gide's novel of 1891, "Les Cahiers d'André Walter", the third text on which Camilletti focuses his inquiry. These three texts evoke in various ways the relationship between Dante and Beatrice, using it as a cultural allusion through which specific problems of sexuality (or, better, of the absence of sexuality) are conveyed. This essay aims therefore to be a study in the rhapsodic and subterranean presence of Dante and the "Vita Nova" between the end of the nineteenth and the twentieth centuries, as well as in the relationship between literature and psychoanalysis through the quartet Dante-Gide-Delay-Lacan.
Early in his life Pasolini showed interest in Dante: in a letter sent to Luciano Serra in 1945, he declared that 'la questione di Dante è importantissima'. He later reaffirmed his interest in Dante in two attempts to rewrite the "Commedia": "La Mortaccia" and "La Divina Mimesis". [...] In 1963 he mentioned "La Divina Mimesis" for the first time. [...] Critics have mostly focused on the work's unfinished condition as a sign of the poetic crisis which Pasolini experienced at the end of his life. Scholarly interpretations of "La Divina Mimesis" can be divided into three main groups: the first strain can be primarily attributed to a 1979 essay by Giorgio Bàrberi Squarotti, four years after the publication of La Divina Mimesis. Bàrberi Squarotti attributes Pasolini's difficulty in completing his rewriting of the "Divine Comedy" to the author's ideology. The work's intermittent irony and its unfinished state are good indicators of the impossibility of recreating Dante's achievement, in particular the Dantean ideology. [...] The second strain of interpretation stresses the work's linguistic dimensions. The period when Pasolini conceives of the project of "La Divina Mimesis" corresponds, according to his repeated declarations, to a time of dramatic change in the Italian linguistic context. [...] Finally, the third type of interpretation locates "La Divina Mimesis" in the theoretical context of Pasolini's final conception of poetry. Here critics stress in particular the difference between the poet's intentions and the final result.[...] These three interpretative strains share the conviction that, in comparison with its model, Pasolini's project ends in failure. It is a failure in at least three senses: on the level of its ideology (not as strong as Dante's), on the level of reality (because of the linguistic standardization of Italian society), and on the level of aesthetics (even though the author pretends that his failure possesses an aesthetic value). This paper would like to question this conclusion: by redefining the object of mimesis and its conditions Davide Luglio tries to understand the reason why the author decided to print his work in a form that at first sight appears ill-defined and fragmentary.
Manuela Marchesini brings Agamben's ideas to bear on Gadda's "Pasticciaccio" and vice versa. While preserving the specificity of their different fields of operation, this mutual exposure contributes to reframing the Culture War of yore. On the one hand, we have a novel published after World War II with a tortuous gestation and convoluted publication history and reception, written by an author who happened to outlive his creative 'canto del cigno'; on the other, a philosophical and essayistic speculation on contemporary events. The function of Dante's "Comedy" in each author spans from the textual to the allegorical, but rests upon one single crucial common denominator: both Gadda and Agamben take literature seriously. [...] The present essay, part of a larger project unfolding along the same lines, attempts a 'close reading' in the spirit that Edward Said has solicited from the humanities in his lectures at Columbia - or, to put it differently, a tentative 'exercise' of critica in the wake of modern Italian Romance philology and textual criticism from Pasquali through Contini and Debenedetti (a lineage of which Agamben's approach appears to be mindful). [...] Marchesini passes over the general Dantesque infernal allegory of "Pasticciaccio" in order to expand on its final scene. Her thesis is that "Pasticciaccio's" allegorical use of Dante's "Comedy" does not just unravel its interpretive knot. It also points to a utopian overcoming of binarism that concurs with Agamben's reflections. "Pasticciaccio's" closure is neither an epiphany (in the sense of a final celebration of the missing piece that completes the puzzle of the novel), nor does it signal a collapse into ambiguity or irrationality (in the sense that everything is left undecided, wavering between one possibility and its opposite). Gadda maintains his interpellation of wholeness unequivocally throughout the novel.
Dantes Weltengedicht, das die Jenseitsreise des menschlichen Protagonisten Dante durch die drei Reiche Inferno, Purgatorium und Paradies schildert, verfügt offenbar über eine gewaltige visionäre Faszination und Ausstrahlung, die dazu tendiert, bildkünstlerische Arbeiten sowie Aneignungen in vielfältigen visuellen Medien zu stimulieren. Nicht zufällig partizipieren zahlreiche berühmte europäische Maler, Zeichner und Bildhauer an der unabschließbaren Aufgabe, die Stationen jener Jenseitsreise der Danteschen Projektionsfigur zu illustrieren oder im Medium der bildenden Kunst zu interpretieren. Vor diesem Hintergrund verwundert es außerdem kaum, dass auch die Zeichner und Autoren von Comics, Mangas und Graphic Novels im ausgehenden 20. und 21. Jahrhundert Dantes Werke und besonders die "Commedia" als geeignetes Sujet für sich entdeckt und sie in teils komplexen Text-Bild-Gestaltungen adaptiert haben. Der japanische Mangakünstler Gô Nagai schreibt sich mit "Dante Shinkyoku" (1994–1995) in den Kontext einer globalen und transmedialen Danterezeption ein und bedient sich dabei vielfältiger Referenzen auf die europäische Geschichte der Dante-Illustration.
Dantes Weltengedicht, das die Jenseitsreise des menschlichen Protagonisten Dante durch die drei Reiche Inferno, Purgatorium und Paradies schildert, verfügt offenbar über eine gewaltige visionäre Faszination und Ausstrahlung, die dazu tendiert, bildkünstlerische Arbeiten sowie Aneignungen in vielfältigen visuellen Medien zu stimulieren. Nicht zufällig partizipieren zahlreiche berühmte europäische Maler, Zeichner und Bildhauer an der unabschließbaren Aufgabe, die Stationen jener Jenseitsreise der Danteschen Projektionsfigur zu illustrieren oder im Medium der bildenden Kunst zu interpretieren. Vor diesem Hintergrund verwundert es außerdem kaum, dass auch die Zeichner und Autoren von Comics, Mangas und Graphic Novels im ausgehenden 20. und 21. Jahrhundert Dantes Werke und besonders die "Commedia" als geeignetes Sujet für sich entdeckt und sie in teils komplexen Text-Bild-Gestaltungen adaptiert haben. Der japanische Mangakünstler Gô Nagai schreibt sich mit "Dante Shinkyoku" (1994–1995) in den Kontext einer globalen und transmedialen Danterezeption ein und bedient sich dabei vielfältiger Referenzen auf die europäische Geschichte der Dante-Illustration.
Vor uns liegt ein Kupferstich auf Papier: er misst 27,5 cm in der Höhe und 20 cm in der Breite, ein handlich-mobiles, druckgraphisches Objekt also. Am unteren Rand, innerhalb des von feinen Linien markierten Druckrahmens der Platte, stehen die drei Signaturen der an der Produktion des Blatts Beteiligten: "L.Cigoli Florent. figuravit. Cornelius Galle sculpsit. C.Galle excudit", entwerfender Florentiner Künstler ("figuravit"), Kupferstecher ("sculpsit") und Verleger ("excudit"). Das Blatt befindet sich heute im Amsterdamer Rijksmuseum. Ein geringfügig kleinerer, beschnittener Druck (26,2 cm × 19,3 cm) im British Museum in London trägt am unteren Rand nur die Marke des Verlegers aus Nürnberg: "B. Caimax excudit". Der in Florenz und Rom aktive Maler Ludovico Cigoli (1559–1613) hatte um 1595, wohl in Florenz, Zeichnungen als Vorlage für den Stich angefertigt. Er greift mit seiner Teufelsfigur eine Figuration Giovanni Stradanos von 1588 auf, die wiederum, nicht im Detail, aber in der monumentalen Anlage der Figur des Satans auf Botticellis Zeichnung vom Ende des 15. Jahrhunderts rekurriert. Vermutlich sollten die dann gestochenen Blätter zunächst als eine Art Anschauungsmaterial im Rahmen akademischer Vorlesungen und Debatten über Dante dienen. Gegen Ende des 16. Jahrhunderts waren regelrechte Wort- und Argumentschlachten unter Florentiner Intellektuellen, vornehmlich an den neu gegründeten Sprachakademien, um den Stellenwert von Dantes Dichtung im Allgemeinen und um die konkreten Formen seiner poetisch konstruierten Jenseitsräume im Besonderen ausgetragen worden. Das Londoner Blatt, in Nürnberg gedruckt und verlegt, zeigt, dass Cigolis gestochener Lucifer um 1600 auch überregional reüssierte: ein gleichsam intellektuell eingehegtes und doch ästhetisch eindrücklich neu formuliertes Bild des Teufels Dantescher Lesart, das im Medium des Kupferstichs Verbreitung findet.