950 Geschichte Asiens; des Fernen Ostens
Refine
Year of publication
- 2021 (6)
- 2018 (5)
- 2019 (5)
- 2003 (4)
- 2015 (4)
- 1959 (2)
- 1998 (2)
- 2002 (2)
- 2004 (2)
- 2013 (2)
- 2014 (2)
- 2016 (2)
- 2017 (2)
- 2020 (2)
- 1775 (1)
- 1857 (1)
- 1894 (1)
- 1896 (1)
- 1902 (1)
- 1910 (1)
- 1915 (1)
- 1918 (1)
- 1919 (1)
- 1931 (1)
- 1939 (1)
- 1940 (1)
- 1942 (1)
- 1943 (1)
- 1962 (1)
- 1964 (1)
- 1972 (1)
- 1974 (1)
- 1980 (1)
- 1995 (1)
- 1999 (1)
- 2000 (1)
- 2008 (1)
- 2009 (1)
- 2011 (1)
- 2022 (1)
Document Type
- Article (25)
- Book (11)
- Review (11)
- Part of Periodical (7)
- Report (5)
- Working Paper (4)
- Part of a Book (3)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
- Periodical (1)
Language
- German (31)
- English (25)
- Portuguese (6)
- French (3)
- Multiple languages (2)
- Turkish (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (68)
Keywords
- Tibnīn (3)
- Crusades (2)
- Damascus (2)
- Emad al-Dīn Zingy (2)
- Geschichte (2)
- Hebron (2)
- Humphrey II (2)
- Kingdom of Jerusalem (2)
- Latin East (2)
- Nour al- al-Dīn Zingy (2)
Institute
- Geschichtswissenschaften (11)
- Extern (4)
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Ostasienstudien (IZO) (4)
- Sprach- und Kulturwissenschaften (4)
- Kulturwissenschaften (3)
- Exzellenzcluster Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen (2)
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (2)
- Präsidium (2)
- Rechtswissenschaft (2)
- Evangelische Theologie (1)
The Crusade movement is one of the most important occurrences of medieval history. It took place throughout two centuries in the Levant and affected both Muslims and Crusaders and in turn changed the way in which West and East related to one another. When the Crusaders took control of the Holy Land and many Islamic cities in the Levant, they transferred their feudal European system there. They established four main fiefdoms or lordships, Jerusalem, Edessa, Antioch and Tripoli. In addition, there were another twelve secondary fiefdoms, of which Tibnīn was one. Tibnīn was called “Toron” by the Crusaders. Once the Crusaders had captured Tibnīn, they began building its fortified castle, from which the fief of Tibnīn gained its importance throughout the period of the Crusades.
This paper traces the military role of Tibnīn and its rulers in the Latin East against the Muslims until 1187/ 583. Tibnīn played a key role in overcoming the Muslims in Tyre and controlled it in 1124. It also played a vital role in the conflict between Damascus and the Kingdom of Jerusalem. Tibnīn participated in defending Antioch, Banyas, Hebron and Transjordan several times. Furthermore, its soldiers and Knights joined the army of the Kingdom of Jerusalem to capture Ascalon in 1153, and joined the campaigns of Amaury I, King of Jerusalem, against Egypt from 1164 to1169. The military situation of Tibnīn under the rule of the royal house until its fall to the Muslims in 1187/ 583 will be studied as well.
Tibnīn was an important small Crusader fief and a fortified castle. It was vital for the Kingdom of Jerusalem, because it included fertile agricultural lands, was a tax collection centre, and because it controlled the Damascus-to-Tyre commercial route. Additionally, its castle played defensive and offensive role in the north of the Kingdom of Jerusalem and upper Galilee, and its rulers of Tibnīn played a major role in forming the history of the Latin East. When the Crusaders invaded the Levant at the end of the eleventh century, it was given rise to new demographic, cultural, socio-economic, and architectural features. The present Paper aims at removing some of the mystery concerning the fief of Tibnīn and its castle in the Latin East. This paper thus is a study of the demographic structure of Tibnīn and discusses the socio-economic role of Tibnīn in the Latin east. Moreover, the role of Tibnīn in influencing the relations between Muslims and the Crusaders in the Levant and the architecture of the castle of Tibnīn and its importance in the age of the Crusade will be examined.
Dass das Papsttum und sein jurisdiktioneller Anspruch letztlich auf dem Apostel Petrus basieren, der, wie man bei Matthäus lesen kann, der Fels ist, auf dem Christus seine Kirche errichten wollte (Matth. 16,18), ist eine bekannte Tatsache, auf die hier nicht eingegangen werden soll. Der in Rom zentrierte Rechtsraum der lateinischen Kirche stand schon bald, spätestens im 5. Jahrhundert, im Gegensatz zum sich seit dem 4. Jahrhundert konstituierenden Rechtsraum der griechischen Kirche(n) mit Antiocheia, Alexandreia, Jerusalem (ab 451) und schließlich Konstantinopel, der zweiten Hauptstadt des Römischen Reiches und ab 476 der einzigen Hauptstadt. Das kanonische Recht beider Bereiche entwickelte sich im Verlaufe der Jahrhunderte auseinander. Trotz gemeinsamer Grundlagen (der sieben bzw. acht ökumenischen Konzilien und deren Rechtssetzung) gab es Konflikte, die sich schließlich seit dem 11. Jahrhundert in einem bis heute andauernden Schisma niederschlugen. Ein steter Stein des Anstoßes (neben den anderen bekannten Differenzen – Azymen, Filioque usw.) war der römische Primatsanspruch, den man in Konstantinopel nie anerkannte und dem man etwa die sog. Pentarchietheorie entgegensetzte. Erst spät, wie hier gezeigt werden soll, um 800, setzte man in Konstantinopel Petrus seinen Bruder Andreas entgegen, den "Erstberufenen" (vgl. Joh. 1,35–42). Jedenfalls versuchte man dies, vermutlich nach römischem Vorbild. Wann genau und warum dies geschah, ist Gegenstand der folgenden Ausführungen. ...
Als Band zwei der neuen Reihe Religion and Law in Medieval and Muslim Societies (von der inzwischen schon mehrere Titel vorliegen) erschien dieser bemerkenswerte Band. Die Rolle der Juden im Recht des frühen Mittelalters ist natürlich schon mehrfach untersucht worden, doch ist man dankbar für einen Band, der die Forschung widerspiegelt und an vielen Punkten weiter voranbringt. Die einzelnen Beiträge sind in der Regel auch bibliographisch à jour, so dass dieser Sammelband durchaus auch die Eigenschaften eines Handbuchs aufweist. ...
Während des atlantischen Zeitalters der Revolutionen fanden in weiten Teilen des spanischen Amerika antikoloniale Rebellionen statt, die gemeinhin weniger bekannt sind als die Amerikanische oder die Französische Revolution. In der andinen Geschichte gilt das 18. Jahrhundert als "Zeitalter der Aufstände". Mehr als hundert Revolten seit den 1730er Jahren kulminierten in den Rebellionen von 1780–1783. Auf dem Gebiet der heutigen Staaten Peru und Bolivien (Hochperu) bedrohten diese die spanische Kolonialherrschaft massiv und sollten in vier Jahren etwa 100.000 Todesopfer fordern. Tupac Amaru führte 1780–1781 die größte und berühmteste Rebellion im kolonialen Hispanoamerika an. Ihr widmet Charles Walker, Historiker an der University of California, Davis, seine jüngste Monographie. Nach einem Werk zum Erdbeben von Lima 1746 knüpft das hier besprochene Buch an Gedanken an, die er 1999 im zweiten Kapitel von Smoldering Ashes formuliert hatte. Dort bildete die Rebellion Tupac Amarus den Beginn der Untersuchung, nun steht sie im Mittelpunkt. ...
The contributions of Korean and Taiwanese authors to the many and varied formulations of interwar pan-Asianism have so far remained a relatively unexplored subject of scholarly research, despite an unbroken interest in the trajectory of state-based Japanese pan-Asianism. Focusing on Korean students and independence activists, this article discusses alternative configurations of regional unity and solidarity that emanated from the interactions among Korean, Taiwanese, and other Asian actors who resided in Tokyo during the 1910s and 1920s. When the ethnic-nationalist interpretations of the Wilsonian principle of self-determination failed to materialize, a portion of anti-colonial activists in Asia began to emphasize the need for solidarity by drawing on what they perceived as traditional and shared “Asian” values. While challenging the Western-dominated international order of nation-states that perpetuated imperialism, such notions of Asian solidarity at the same time served as an ideology of liberation from Japanese imperialism. Examining journals published by Korean students and activists, including The Asia Kunglun, this article adds another layer to the history of pan-Asianism from below, a perspective that has often been neglected within the larger context of scholarship on pan-Asianism and Japanese imperialism in Asia.
Baupläne des späten 19. und frühen 20. Jahrhunderts zeigen in den britischen Kolonialstadtgründungen Penang (Malaysia) und Singapur, dass genderdifferenzierte Raumkonzepte das Wohnen geprägt haben. In diesem Artikel werden die Formen des Wohnens sowie der Wandel der Raum- und Stadtstrukturen im kolonialstädtischen Südostasien beschrieben, die zur Herausbildung dieser binären Raumstrukturen geführt haben. Neben den sozioökonomischen Veränderungsprozessen verdienen Aspekte wie Geschlechterbeziehungen, Familien- und Haushaltsformen sowie vorbildprägende Wohnformen der Oberschichten besondere Aufmerksamkeit. Der Wandel der Wohnformen und -verhältnisse wird am Beispiel des innerstädtischen Shophouses konkretisiert. Das Shophouse hatte sich von einem teilgewerblich genutzten Stadthaus, das nach dem chinesischen Hofhaus angelegt war, zu einem Wohnreihenhaus nach Vorbildern viktorianischer Vorstadthäuser in Großbritannien entwickelt und diente schließlich als suburbanes Wohnhaus.
Das Recht nimmt keine zentrale Stellung ein in diesem Band zu "Asian Perspectives on the Paris Peace Conference and the Interwar Order, 1919–33", dies sei gleich zu Beginn dieser Rezension in einer rechtshistorischen Fachzeitschrift angemerkt. Was dieser Band allerdings bietet, sind äußerst vielschichtige und differenzierende Perspektiven auf einen Gegenstand, der in der Rechtsgeschichte bislang nicht nur, aber vor allem auf seine Bedeutung im europäischen Kontext hin erforscht wurde. ...
In the past 30 years, the end of the Cold War and the breakdown of the modernist frame of politics have promoted the historical turn of international law. A non-Eurocentric narrative of international law is needed not only to help it go beyond the geographical and conceptual self-justification, but also to open itself to other normative orders. This presents an intellectual and normative challenge to legal historians, who increasingly explore the normative dialogue and competition in interstitial areas, such as South and Southeast Asia in their existence between the Islamic, Sinocentric and European orders. It is this issue and this important era of globalisation that Clara Kemme’s book examines roughly over the period from 1500 to 1900, in particular how the key concepts of tribute and treaty were understood through diplomatic ideas and practices in South and SoutheastAsia, how the treaty system as a product of international law became global and why it prevailed over other systems of order (2). ...
During the drafting process from the 1920s to 1940s, the Weimar Constitution (WRV) played a decisive role in shaping Chinese social(-ist) con- stitutions, especially the part related to the social- economic issue. Through the lens of cultural trans- lation, this paper seeks to explain how the WRV was adapted, reinterpreted, and recontextualized throughout several rounds of constitution making in China. By focusing on the roles played by the translators, legislators, and interpreters, this paper discusses how the social rights created by the WRV were translated into the fundamental policy of the 1947 Constitution of the Republic of China. More- over, regarding »policy« as the legal instrument for regulating the social-economic life, and even broader fields, it triggers the modern transforma- tion of Chinese meritocracy and reinforces the national legal tradition depicted in its modern form. To some extent, this case study on cultural translation of constitutional law discloses the mechanism, both temporarily and spatially, for the intercultural communication of the normative information.
Johannes Schiltberger, 1394-1427 yılları arasında Türkiye, Suriye, Mısır, İran, Orta Asya ve Sibirya'da esir olarak yaşayıp gördüklerini "Türkler ve Tatarlar Arasında (1394-1427)" başlıklı kitabında yazıya geçirir. Çok değişik insan coğrafyalarında bulunmuş olmasından dolayı Schiltberger'in Türkleri insani özellikleri bakımından diğer halklarla karşılaştırma yoluna gideceğini varsayıyoruz. Hans Ulrich Krafft ise 24 Ağustos 1574 yılında borç yüzünden Osmanlı-Türk makamlarınca tutuklanır. 24 Ağustos 1577 yılında tahliye edilir ve memleketine dönmek üzere yola çıkar ve ancak 9 Aralık 1578'de vatanına kavuşur. Mesleği tacirlik olan H. U. Krafft'ın Osmanlı toplumunda geçerli ticaret ve ticari ilişkiler hakkında hassasiyeti olacağından, gözlemlerinde bunlara yer vereceğini düşünüyoruz. Bu makalede her iki Almanın anılarında İstanbul'un fethi öncesi ve sonra sosyal hayatta gözlemlenen değerler ve değer yargıları ele alınacaktır. Öncelikle sosyal, ahlaki, insani değerler her bir eserde tespit edilecek, sonra bunlar 150 yıllık süre bağlamında karşılaştırılarak Osmanlı-Türk Toplumunda değerler değişimi olup olmadığı ve var ise bunların olası nedenleri üzerinde duracağız.
This paper was presented at the workshop “Goods, Languages, and Cultures along the Silk Road” at Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, October 18 and 19, 2019. While many contributions to the workshop focused on recent developments in China’s current “New Silk Road” politics, on forms of communication, and on contemporary exchange of goods and ideas across so-called Silk Road countries in the Caucasus and Central Asia and with China, this short essay focuses on the history of the so-called Silk Road as an important transport connection. Although what is now called the “Silk Road” was not a pure East-West binary in antiquity but rather developed into a network that also led to the South and North, the focus here will be on describing the East-West connection.
I will start with a few brief remarks on the origins of the connection referred to as the Silk Road and will then introduce the different great empires that shaped this connection between antiquity and the Middle Ages through military campaigns and by using it as a trading route and network. But the Silk Road was by no means only of economic and military importance. Its significance for the exchange and dissemination of religions should also be mentioned. This paper does not detail the importance of the numerous individual religions in the area of the Silk Road but discusses the phenomenon of the spread of religions and the loss of some of their own distinguishing characteristics in this spread, a phenomenon that could be described as a “unity of opposites” (coincidentia oppositorum). Finally, the essay asks who, in the face of the regular replacement of powers, held sovereignty over the transport connection: the subject (in the form of the empires) or the object (in the form of the road).
Who were the main protagonists of and along the Silk Road in the course of history? Who were the people who became the great powers of the ancient Silk Road, building up the material route, governing parts of it, and organizing trade and relationships from the far East to the extreme West of the Eurasian continent?
Projektionsverhältnisse zwischen Körper, Linien und Zeichen stehen im Zentrum des Beitrags von Li-Chun Lee, der sich den Visualisierungsformen von Pulskurven im europäischen und chinesischen Kontext widmet. Mit Rekurs auf Maurice Merleau-Ponty verfolgt Lee die Frage, wie die leibliche Phänomenalität des Pulses in eine für medizinische Analysen genaue Zeichenform übersetzt werden kann. Lee kann in der Gegenüberstellung von sprachlich-metaphorischen, technischen und grafischen Übersetzungsprozessen eine Situation skizzieren, in welcher unterschiedliche Zeichenregime des Pulses und Genauigkeitsvorstellungen aufeinanderstoßen.
This paper focuses on an ongoing project that began in 2012, entitled "The Collection of Jane Ryan & William Saunders". This project is an attempt to reconstitute the Marcos Collection. Sourced from auction catalogues, museum archives, and scant government records, their lavish inventory of commissioned portraits, jewellery, Regency silverware, and old master paintings is reproduced as photographic installations, postcards, and three-dimensional prints. Reconstruction, in this instance, becomes a sustained democratic gesture, allowing an increasingly forgetful public to access a collection that has remained unavailable through a systemic failure by successive post-dictatorial governments to institutionalize collective acts of remembering.