CFS working paper series
https://gfk-cfs.de/working-papers/
Refine
Year of publication
- 2014 (50) (remove)
Document Type
- Working Paper (50)
Language
- English (50)
Has Fulltext
- yes (50)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (50)
Keywords
- financial crisis (4)
- monetary policy (3)
- Alternative investments (2)
- G-SIFIs (2)
- Household finance (2)
- OTC markets (2)
- Progressive Taxation (2)
- asset pricing (2)
- limited attention (2)
- simulated method of moments (2)
- systemic risk (2)
- transparency (2)
- Art market (1)
- Art price index (1)
- Asset pricing (1)
- Asymmetry (1)
- Banker's pay (1)
- Banking crisis (1)
- Bayesian inference (1)
- Capital requirements (1)
- College dropout risk (1)
- College premium (1)
- Conditional response (1)
- Consumption (1)
- Copula (1)
- Corporate Financing (1)
- Crisis contracts (1)
- DSGE (1)
- Debt Securities (1)
- Distribution (1)
- Dynamic Representative Consumer (1)
- EMU (1)
- Education (1)
- Epstein-Zin-Weil recursive preferences (1)
- Equivalent Incomes (1)
- Euro Area (1)
- European Union (1)
- European integration (1)
- Excessive risk taking (1)
- Expenditure Survey (1)
- Explosive behavior (1)
- Financial Industry (1)
- Financial market (1)
- Fiscal Policy (1)
- Framing effects (1)
- Gains from trade (1)
- Government Debt (1)
- Gravity equations (1)
- Great Recession (1)
- Health Insurance (1)
- Hedging (1)
- Household Finance (1)
- Household-Size Economies (1)
- Human capital (1)
- Income Inequality (1)
- Inequality (1)
- Inflation Rate (1)
- Investor behavior (1)
- Kalman filter (1)
- Labor Market Deregulation (1)
- Laffer Curve (1)
- Linear Aggregation (1)
- Loan to income ratio (1)
- Loan to value ratio (1)
- MMFs (1)
- Market discipline (1)
- Maximum likelihood estimation (1)
- Medicare (1)
- Monte Carlo integration (1)
- Mortgage affordability (1)
- Mortgage premia (1)
- Multi-Step estimation (1)
- Multivariate time series (1)
- National Accounting (1)
- Negative home equity (1)
- News media sentiment (1)
- Nonlinearity (1)
- Optimal Asset Allocation (1)
- Panel Data (1)
- Portfolio allocation (1)
- Prediction (1)
- Pricing bubbles (1)
- Product Market Deregulation (1)
- Quantitative trade models (1)
- Real GDP (1)
- Regression Discontinuity (1)
- SEC (1)
- Selection (1)
- Social Insurance (1)
- Sovereign guarantees (1)
- Sparse estimation (1)
- Speculative bubbles (1)
- Stockholding (1)
- Structural Change (1)
- Structural estimation (1)
- Survey Method (1)
- Survey Methods (1)
- Systemic risk (1)
- TRACE (1)
- Time variation (1)
- Too-big-to-fail (1)
- Top 1% (1)
- Trust (1)
- Trustworthiness (1)
- U.S. oil independence (1)
- Unemployment (1)
- VAR (1)
- Value premium (1)
- Value-at-Risk (1)
- Wealth Shocks (1)
- accounting data (1)
- advertising (1)
- affect heuristic (1)
- asymmetric information (1)
- bank balance-sheet channel (1)
- bank capital requirements (1)
- bank regulation (1)
- bank resolution (1)
- banking regulation (1)
- bootstrap (1)
- business equity (1)
- capacity constraints (1)
- collateral (1)
- competitive insurance market (1)
- contract addition (1)
- cooperation (1)
- credit constraints (1)
- credit ratings (1)
- cross-subsidy (1)
- density forecasting (1)
- disclosure (1)
- egulation of financial markets (1)
- emotions (1)
- equity premium (1)
- euro (1)
- experiment (1)
- experiments (1)
- export ban (1)
- financial literacy (1)
- financial regulation (1)
- forbearance (1)
- forecast (1)
- foreign currency lending (1)
- futures (1)
- heterogeneous firms (1)
- household-portfolio shares (1)
- imperfect labor market competition (1)
- impulse response (1)
- incentive compensation (1)
- infrastructure (1)
- intertemporal trade (1)
- intraday (co-)variation risk (1)
- limit order book (1)
- limits to arbitrage (1)
- liquidity (1)
- liquidity externalities (1)
- local method of moments (1)
- long-run risk (1)
- long-term real interest rates (1)
- market expectation (1)
- missing data (1)
- model uncertainty (1)
- money market funds (1)
- mutual funds (1)
- net asset value (1)
- network topology (1)
- nonstandard asymptotics (1)
- oil price (1)
- oil sands (1)
- oil trade (1)
- option prices (1)
- order flow (1)
- panel VAR (1)
- performance pricing (1)
- performance-sensitive debt (1)
- politics (1)
- predictive likelihood (1)
- price discovery (1)
- productivity (1)
- public policy analysis (1)
- rare disaster risk (1)
- reactive equilibrium (1)
- refining (1)
- risk perception (1)
- risk premium (1)
- risk taking (1)
- robust inference (1)
- screening (1)
- securities (1)
- securities law and regulation (1)
- shadow banking (1)
- shale oil (1)
- smoothing (1)
- social dilemmas (1)
- social norm (1)
- sovereign exposures (1)
- sovereignbank linkages (1)
- spot covariance (1)
- structural estimation (1)
- structured products (1)
- subsistence consumption (1)
- systemic risk contribution (1)
- tail dependence (1)
- tight oil (1)
- too-big-to-fail (1)
- trade (1)
- trade signaling (1)
- unconventional oil (1)
- underinvestment (1)
- vertical differentiation (1)
- weak identification (1)
- wealth inequality (1)
- welfare (1)
Institute
- Center for Financial Studies (CFS) (50) (remove)
499
This article examines how the shale oil revolution has shaped the evolution of U.S. crude oil and gasoline prices. It puts the evolution of shale oil production into historical perspective, highlights uncertainties about future shale oil production, and cautions against the view that the U.S. may become the next Saudi Arabia. It then reviews the role of the ban on U.S. crude oil exports, of capacity constraints in refining and transporting crude oil, of differences in the quality of conventional and unconventional crude oil, and of the recent regional fragmentation of the global market for crude oil for the determination of U.S. oil and gasoline prices. It discusses the reasons for the persistent wedge between U.S. crude oil prices and global crude oil prices in recent years and for the fact that domestic oil prices below global levels need not translate to lower U.S. gasoline prices. It explains why the shale oil revolution unlike the shale gas revolution is unlikely to stimulate a boom in oil-intensive manufacturing industries. It also explores the implications of shale oil production for the transmission of oil price shocks to the U.S. economy.
498
One of the leading methods of estimating the structural parameters of DSGE models is the VAR-based impulse response matching estimator. The existing asympotic theory for this estimator does not cover situations in which the number of impulse response parameters exceeds the number of VAR model parameters. Situations in which this order condition is violated arise routinely in applied work. We establish the consistency of the impulse response matching estimator in this situation, we derive its asymptotic distribution, and we show how this distribution can be approximated by bootstrap methods. Our methods of inference remain asymptotically valid when the order condition is satisfied, regardless of whether the usual rank condition for the application of the delta method holds. Our analysis sheds new light on the choice of the weighting matrix and covers both weakly and strongly identified DSGE model parameters. We also show that under our assumptions special care is needed to ensure the asymptotic validity of Bayesian methods of inference. A simulation study suggests that the frequentist and Bayesian point and interval estimators we propose are reasonably accurate in finite samples. We also show that using these methods may affect the substantive conclusions in empirical work.
497
We characterize optimal redistribution in a dynastic family model with human capital. We show how a government can improve the trade-off between equality and incentives by changing the amount of observable human capital. We provide an intuitive decomposition for the wedge between human-capital investment in the laissez faire and the social optimum. This wedge differs from the wedge for bequests because human capital carries risk: its returns depend on the non-diversi
able risk of children's ability. Thus, human capital investment is encouraged more than bequests in the social optimum if human capital is a bad hedge for consumption risk.
496
Money is more than memory
(2014)
Impersonal exchange is the hallmark of an advanced society. One key institution for impersonal exchange is money, which economic theory considers just a primitive arrangement for monitoring past conduct in society. If so, then a public record of past actions — or memory — supersedes the function performed by money. This intriguing theoretical postulate remains untested. In an experiment, we show that the suggested functional equality between money and memory does not translate into an empirical equivalence. Monetary systems perform a richer set of functions than just revealing past behaviors, which proves to be crucial in promoting large-scale cooperation.
495
Emotions-at-risk: an experimental investigation into emotions, option prices and risk perception
(2014)
This paper experimentally investigates how emotions are associated with option prices and risk perception. Using a binary lottery, we find evidence that the emotion ‘surprise’ plays a significant role in the negative correlation between lottery returns and estimates of the price of a put option. Our findings shed new light on various existing theories on emotions and affect. We find gratitude, admiration, and joy to be positively associated with risk perception, although the affect heuristic predicts a negative association. In contrast with the predictions of the appraisal tendency framework (ATF), we document a negative correlation between option price and surprise for lottery winners. Finally, the results show that the option price is not associated with risk perception as commonly used in psychology.
494
This chapter analyzes the risk and return characteristics of investments in artists from the Middle East and Northern Africa (MENA) region over the sample period 2000 to 2012. With hedonic regression modeling we create an annual index that is based on 3,544 paintings created by 663 MENA artists. Our empirical results prove that investing in such a hypothetical index provides strong financial returns. While the results show an exponential growth in sales since 2006, the geometric annual return of the MENA art index is a stable13.9 percent over the whole period. We conclude that investing in MENA paintings would have been profitable but also note that we examined the performance of an emerging art market that has only seen an upward trend without any correction, yet.
493
The record-breaking prices observed in the art market over the last three years raise the question of whether we are experiencing a speculative bubble. Given the difficulty to determine the fundamental value of artworks, we apply a right-tailed unit root test with forward recursive regressions (SADF test) to detect explosive behaviors directly in the time series of four different art market segments (“Impressionist and Modern”, “Post-war and Contemporary”, “American”, and “Latin American”) for the period from 1970 to 2013. We identify two historical speculative bubbles and find an explosive movement in today’s “Post-war and Contemporary” and “American” fine art market segments.
492
This paper investigates the impact of news media sentiment on financial market returns and volatility in the long-term. We hypothesize that the way the media formulate and present news to the public produces different perceptions and, thus, incurs different investor behavior. To analyze such framing effects we distinguish between optimistic and pessimistic news frames. We construct a monthly media sentiment indicator by taking the ratio of the number of newspaper articles that contain predetermined negative words to the number of newspaper articles that contain predetermined positive words in the headline and/or the lead paragraph. Our results indicate that pessimistic news media sentiment is positively related to global market volatility and negatively related to global market returns 12 to 24 months in advance. We show that our media sentiment indicator reflects very well the financial market crises and pricing bubbles over the past 20 years.
491
Since the 2008 financial crisis, in which the Reserve Primary Fund “broke the buck,” money market funds (MMFs) have been the subject of ongoing policy debate. Many commentators view MMFs as a key contributor to the crisis because widespread redemption demands during the days following the Lehman bankruptcy contributed to a freeze in the credit markets. In response, MMFs were deemed a component of the nefarious shadow banking industry and targeted for regulatory reform. The Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) misguided 2014 reforms responded by potentially exacerbating MMF fragility while potentially crippling large segments of the MMF industry.
Determining the appropriate approach to MMF reform has been difficult. Banks regulators supported requiring MMFs to trade at a floating net asset value (NAV) rather than a stable $1 share price. By definition, a floating NAV prevents MMFs from breaking the buck but is unlikely to eliminate the risk of large redemptions in a time of crisis. Other reform proposals have similar shortcomings. More fundamentally, the SEC’s reforms may substantially reduce the utility of MMFs for many investors, which could, in turn, affect the availability of short term credit.
The shape of MMF reform has been influenced by a turf war among regulators as the SEC has battled with bank regulators both about the need for additional reforms and about the structure and timing of those reforms. Bank regulators have been influential in shaping the terms of the debate by using banking rhetoric to frame the narrative of MMF fragility. This rhetoric masks a critical difference between banks and MMFs – asset segregation. Unlike banks, MMF sponsors have assets and operations that are separate from the assets of the MMF itself. This difference has caused the SEC to mistake sponsor support as a weakness rather than a key stability-enhancing feature. As a result, the SEC mistakenly adopted reforms that burden sponsor support instead of encouraging it.
As this article explains, required sponsor support offers a novel and simple regulatory solution to MMF fragility. Accordingly this article proposes that the SEC require MMF sponsors explicitly to guarantee the $1 share price. Taking sponsor support out of the shadows embraces rather than ignores the advantage that MMFs offer over banks through asset partitioning. At the same time, sponsor support harnesses market discipline as a constraint against MMF risk-taking and moral hazard.
490
How much additional tax revenue can the government generate by increasing labor income taxes? In this paper we provide a quantitative answer to this question, and study the importance of the progressivity of the tax schedule for the ability of the government to generate tax revenues. We develop a rich overlapping generations model featuring an explicit family structure, extensive and intensive margins of labor supply, endogenous accumulation of labor market experience as well as standard intertemporal consumption-savings choices in the presence of uninsurable idiosyncratic labor productivity risk. We calibrate the model to US macro, micro and tax data and characterize the labor income tax Laffer curve under the current choice of the progressivity of the labor income tax code as well as when varying progressivity. We find that more progressive labor income taxes significantly reduce tax revenues. For the US, converting to a flat tax code raises the peak of the Laffer curve by 6%, whereas converting to a tax system with progressivity similar to Denmark would lower the peak by 7%. We also show that, relative to a representative agent economy tax revenues are less sensitive to the progressivity of the tax code in our economy. This finding is due to the fact that labor supply of two earner households is less elastic (along the intensive margin) and the endogenous accumulation of labor market experience makes labor supply of females less elastic (around the extensive margin) to changes in tax progressivity.