Working Paper
Refine
Year of publication
- 2022 (126) (remove)
Document Type
- Working Paper (126) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (126)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (126)
Keywords
- Covid-19 (4)
- Digital Services Act (4)
- ESG (4)
- Digitalisierung (3)
- Mobilität (3)
- climate change (3)
- AI borrower classification (2)
- AI enabled credit scoring (2)
- Artificial Intelligence (2)
- Asset Pricing (2)
- Banking Union (2)
- Big Data (2)
- COVID-19 (2)
- Corona-Pandemie (2)
- DSA (2)
- Desinformation (2)
- Disclosure (2)
- European Central Bank (2)
- European Parliament (2)
- Experiment (2)
- Experten (2)
- FOMC (2)
- FinTech (2)
- Financial Regulation (2)
- Finanzkrise (2)
- Flüchtlinge (2)
- Forschung (2)
- Gesundheit (2)
- Hassrede (2)
- Household Finance (2)
- Klimawandel (2)
- Krise (2)
- Market Liquidity (2)
- Medienberichterstattung (2)
- Nachhaltigkeit (2)
- Performance (2)
- Politikberatung (2)
- Russia (2)
- SWIFT (2)
- Sustainability (2)
- Transparency (2)
- Ukraine (2)
- Wissenschaftskommunikation (2)
- accountability (2)
- brown-spinning (2)
- climate (2)
- credit scoring methodology (2)
- credit scoring regulation (2)
- financial privacy (2)
- institutional investors (2)
- natural gas (2)
- peer effects (2)
- political economy (2)
- politische Reformen (2)
- portfolio management (2)
- price stability (2)
- private companies (2)
- private equity (2)
- responsible lending (2)
- social media (2)
- statistical discrimination (2)
- sustainability (2)
- uncertainty (2)
- 13F filings (1)
- 2-Sector Model (1)
- 401(k) plan (1)
- Accounting (1)
- Acquisitions (1)
- Affordability crisis (1)
- Akzeptanzuntersuchung (1)
- Akzeptierbarkeit (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Art investment (1)
- Art. 17 DSM-Richtlinie (1)
- Asset prices (1)
- Bailin (1)
- Bank Accounting (1)
- Bank's Balance Sheets (1)
- Banks (1)
- Bayesian Estimation (1)
- Behavioral Finance (1)
- Behavioral Measurement (1)
- Beliefs (1)
- Beliefs and Choice (1)
- Bestimmtheit (1)
- Bias in medical research (1)
- Biased Beliefs (1)
- Big Five (1)
- Big Five Personality (1)
- Big Techs (1)
- Big Three (1)
- Big data (1)
- Blockchain (1)
- Broker (1)
- Business Subsidies (1)
- CBDC (1)
- CECL (1)
- Carbon Taxation (1)
- Cash (1)
- Caste (1)
- Causal Machine Learning (1)
- Chihuahuan Desert (1)
- Choice under Risk (1)
- Cholesky decomposition (1)
- Climate Change (1)
- Coalitions (1)
- Colocation (1)
- Complex Financial Instruments (1)
- Consulting (1)
- Consumer Welfare (1)
- Content ID (1)
- Corporate Governance (1)
- Corporate concentration (1)
- Covid pandemic (1)
- Cryptocurrencies (1)
- Cultural Economics (1)
- Cultural Finance (1)
- Cultural Norms (1)
- Customer data sharing (1)
- DMA (1)
- DSGE (1)
- DSGE models (1)
- Data access (1)
- Data portability (1)
- Dienst der Informationsgesellschaft (1)
- Digital Markets Act (1)
- Digital footprints (1)
- Disclosure regulation (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Dyson (1)
- ESM (1)
- Economic and Monetary Union (1)
- Eindeutigkeit (1)
- Empirical Contract Theory (1)
- Energy Embargo (1)
- Enriched Digital Footprint (1)
- Environmental (1)
- Environmental, social, and governance factors (ESG) (1)
- Estimation (1)
- Ethics (1)
- European Banking Union (1)
- European Capital Markets Union (1)
- European Commision (1)
- European Commission (1)
- European Investment Bank (1)
- European Stability Mechanism (1)
- European integration (1)
- Eurozone (1)
- Execution Cost (1)
- Exklusion (1)
- Expected credit losses (1)
- Externalities (1)
- Factor Models (1)
- Fahrradinfrastruktur (1)
- Fiduciary Duties (1)
- FinTech and Textual Analysis (1)
- Financial Markets (1)
- Financial Supervision (1)
- Financial interests (1)
- Fintech (1)
- Fire Sales (1)
- Fixed Income (1)
- Forecasting (1)
- Frankfurt am Main (1)
- Fraud (1)
- Fund family (1)
- Gambling (1)
- Gemeinschaftliches Wohnen (1)
- Gemeinwohl (1)
- Generationenrente (1)
- Generations (1)
- Global Optimization (1)
- Governance (1)
- Green Nudging (1)
- Green Quantitative Easing (1)
- Greenwashing (1)
- Hate Speech (1)
- Haushaltsbefragung (1)
- Headline (1)
- Heterogeneous Agents (1)
- Heterogeneous Firms (1)
- High-Frequency Trading (1)
- High-dimensional Methods (1)
- History & Finance (1)
- Household finance (1)
- IFRS 9 (1)
- IPS (1)
- IV (1)
- IV approach (1)
- Idiosyncratic Risk (1)
- Impairments (1)
- Incomplete Contracts (1)
- Institutional Investor (1)
- Integrated Assessment Model (1)
- Inter-ethnic Conflict (1)
- Invasion (1)
- Klarheit (1)
- Krisenprotokoll (1)
- LBO spillovers (1)
- Lending (1)
- Levola (1)
- Life insurance companies (1)
- Limited Commitment (1)
- Limited Enforcement (1)
- Limits to Arbitrage (1)
- Liquidation Preferences (1)
- Liquidity (1)
- Liquidity Risk (1)
- Loans (1)
- Long-run risk (1)
- Lottery stocks (1)
- Maastricht criteria (1)
- Management (1)
- Marginal Propensity to Consume (1)
- Market Fragmentation (1)
- Market Microstructure (1)
- Market Quality (1)
- Marketplace lending (1)
- Methodenbericht (1)
- MiCA (1)
- Middle East and North Africa (1)
- Mixed-frequency data (1)
- Mobilitätsverhalten (1)
- Model-based regulation (1)
- Monitoring (1)
- Monte Carlo Methods (1)
- Morality (1)
- NFT (1)
- NetzDG (1)
- Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz (1)
- Neuaufteilung öffentlicher Räume (1)
- Non-Compete Agreements (1)
- Non-Fungible Tokens (1)
- Numerical accuracy (1)
- Online Poker (1)
- Online-Plattformen (1)
- Open banking (1)
- Option-implied Risk (1)
- Organizational Economics (1)
- Overblocking (1)
- P2P lending (1)
- Paycheck Protection Program (1)
- Paycheck Sensitivity (1)
- Persistence (1)
- Personnel Economics (1)
- Pivotality (1)
- Plattform (1)
- Policy Center (1)
- Political Economy (1)
- Portfolio optimization (1)
- Price elasticity of gasoline demand (1)
- Pricing Determinants (1)
- Product returns (1)
- Prosociality (1)
- Public Finance (1)
- Random Route (1)
- Random-Route-Verfahren (1)
- Real estate (1)
- Reallocation (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Religion (1)
- Rents (1)
- Research and development (1)
- Retail Challenge (1)
- Retail investors (1)
- Ridepooling (1)
- Risikomanagement (1)
- Risikominderung (1)
- Risk Attitudes (1)
- Risk Preferences (1)
- Risk Sharing (1)
- Robo-Advising (1)
- Russian Sanction (1)
- Rücklaufquote (1)
- SME Trading (1)
- SRB (1)
- SRF (1)
- SVAR (1)
- Sanctions (1)
- Securities Market Regulation (1)
- Short-run and long-run inflation expectations (1)
- Short-time work (1)
- Sieckmann (1)
- Social (1)
- Social Capital (1)
- Social Conditioning (1)
- Social Impact (1)
- Social Learning (1)
- Social Security claiming (1)
- Socially responsible investments (1)
- Solution methods (1)
- Solvency regulation (1)
- Soziale Teilhabe / Partizipation (1)
- Sporthelm (1)
- Stability and Growth Pact (1)
- States (1)
- Stationary Equilibrium (1)
- Subsidization (1)
- Supervision (1)
- Supply Chain (1)
- Survey Data (1)
- Swiss Army Knife (1)
- Temporal aggregation (1)
- Textual Analysis (1)
- Time Inconsistency (1)
- Time Preferences (1)
- Trados (1)
- Transaction Data (1)
- Trust (1)
- Universal banks (1)
- Venture Capital (1)
- Venture capital (1)
- Verhaltenskodex (1)
- Verkehr (1)
- Verkehrspolitik (1)
- Verkehrspolitische Maßnahmen (1)
- Vermittlungsdienst, (1)
- Vernetzung (1)
- Vertrauen (1)
- Volcker Rule (1)
- Wettbewerbsrecht (1)
- Wirksamkeit (1)
- annuity (1)
- art (1)
- asset valuation (1)
- asymmetric information (1)
- auctions (1)
- bail-in (1)
- bank regulation (1)
- bank resolution (1)
- banking (1)
- banking union (1)
- banknotes (1)
- banks (1)
- based on a single specimen (1)
- belief formation (1)
- beliefs (1)
- betting (1)
- biases (1)
- big data (1)
- bitcoin (1)
- blockchain (1)
- bond market liquidity (1)
- bureaucrats' incentives (1)
- business cycle (1)
- capital markets (1)
- capital regulation (1)
- capital requirements (1)
- central bank communication (1)
- civil war (1)
- climate-related disclosures (1)
- coal (1)
- collateral reuse (1)
- common ownership (1)
- computer vision (1)
- computer visionbiases (1)
- concept and conceptions of trust (1)
- conditionality (1)
- conflict (1)
- contentious politics (1)
- continuous limit order book (1)
- core (1)
- credit risk (1)
- creditors runs (1)
- crises (1)
- cross-equation restrictions of rational expectations (1)
- cross-section (1)
- cryptocurrencies (1)
- debt cost (1)
- democracy (1)
- deposit guarantee scheme (1)
- derivatives (1)
- diesel (1)
- digital planning tool (1)
- digitale Geschäftsmodelle (1)
- disagreement (1)
- disaster risk (1)
- discourse analysis (1)
- discrimination (1)
- economic governance (1)
- economies of scale (1)
- electricity (1)
- endogeneity (1)
- energy crisis (1)
- equity cost (1)
- experts (1)
- external instruments (1)
- factorization of matrix polynomials (1)
- filtering (1)
- finance (1)
- finance and development (1)
- finance wage premium (1)
- financial distress (1)
- financial solidarity (1)
- fintech (1)
- fiscal rules (1)
- fiscal solidarity (1)
- frequent batch auctions (1)
- gasoline (1)
- gasoline supply (1)
- gasoline tax (1)
- geistiges Eigentum (1)
- geo-economics (1)
- government bonds (1)
- green financing (1)
- high-frequency trading (1)
- identification (1)
- index funds (1)
- inequality (1)
- inflation (1)
- inflation expectations (1)
- inflation surge (1)
- insider trading (1)
- institutions (1)
- investment behavior (1)
- investment decisions (1)
- investment forum (1)
- investor coalitions (1)
- jet fuel (1)
- justification (1)
- kapitalgedeckte Alterssicherung (1)
- labelling (1)
- latency arbitrage (1)
- leverage constraint (1)
- life expectancy (1)
- liquidity provision (1)
- loanable funds (1)
- longevity (1)
- machine learning (1)
- market design (1)
- market microstructure (1)
- market supervision (1)
- market-making (1)
- monetary policy (1)
- monetary policy rule (1)
- monetary system (1)
- monetary transmission (1)
- money (1)
- money creation (1)
- moral hazar (1)
- motivated reasoning (1)
- national interest (1)
- neoinstitutionalism (1)
- net zero transition (1)
- net-zero transition (1)
- normative orders (1)
- oil (1)
- opinion (1)
- orthogonalization (1)
- ownership disclosure (1)
- pass-through (1)
- passive investors (1)
- pathogenic lichenicolous fungi (1)
- pensions (1)
- persistent or transitory inflation shock (1)
- polarization (1)
- policy reform (1)
- policy rule (1)
- politicization (1)
- profit weights (1)
- property rights (1)
- proprietary trading (1)
- randomized control trial (1)
- randomized controlled trial (1)
- rebel governance (1)
- reconciliation of Lucas's advocacy of rational-expectations modelling and policy predictions and Sims's advocacy of VAR modelling (1)
- recursive utility (1)
- regulation (1)
- rehypothecation (1)
- repo market (1)
- retirement (1)
- retirement expectations (1)
- retirement planning (1)
- risk preference (1)
- safe assets (1)
- saving behavior (1)
- savings banks (1)
- securities lending (1)
- sharing economy (1)
- simultaneity (1)
- skill-biased technological change (1)
- sniping (1)
- social impact (1)
- social movements (1)
- social networks (1)
- sovereign bonds (1)
- sovereign debt (1)
- stabilization (1)
- stock market investment (1)
- structural power (1)
- städtebauliches Instrument (1)
- survey (1)
- survey experiment (1)
- survey forecasts (1)
- sustainability disclosures (1)
- tax arbitrage (1)
- taxes (1)
- trust (1)
- venture capital (1)
- worker-firm panels (1)
Institute
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (99)
- Center for Financial Studies (CFS) (83)
- Sustainable Architecture for Finance in Europe (SAFE) (81)
- House of Finance (HoF) (69)
- Foundation of Law and Finance (24)
- Rechtswissenschaft (21)
- Institute for Monetary and Financial Stability (IMFS) (14)
- Exzellenzcluster Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen (6)
- Geographie (5)
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (4)
Common ownership and the (non-)transparency of institutional shareholdings: an EU-US comparison
(2022)
This paper compares the extent of common ownership in the US and the EU stock markets, with a particular focus on differences in the ap- plicable ownership transparency requirements. Most empirical research on common ownership to date has focused on US issuers, largely relying on ownership data obtained from institutional investors’ 13F filings. This type of data is generally not available for EU issuers. Absent 13F filings, researchers have to use ownership records sourced from mutual funds’ periodic reports and blockholder disclosures. Constructing a “reduced dataset” that seeks to capture only ownership information available for both EU and US issuers, I demonstrate that the “extra” ownership information introduced by 13F filings is substantial. However, even when taking differences in the transparency situation into due account, common ownership among listed EU firms is much less pronounced than among listed US firms by any measure. This is true even if the analysis is limited to non-controlled firms.
The great financial crisis and the euro area crisis led to a substantial reform of financial safety nets across Europe and – critically – to the introduction of supranational elements. Specifically, a supranational supervisor was established for the euro area, with discrete arrangements for supervisory competences and tasks depending on the systemic relevance of supervised credit institutions. A resolution mechanism was created to allow the frictionless resolution of large financial institutions. This resolution mechanism has been now complemented with a funding instrument.
While much more progress has been achieved than most observers could imagine 12 years ago, the banking union remains unfinished with important gaps and deficiencies. The experience over the past years, especially in the area of crisis management and resolution, has provided impetus for reform discussions, as reflected most lately in the Eurogroup statement of 16 June 2022.
This Policy Insight looks primarily at the current and the desired state of the banking union project. The key underlying question, and the focus here, is the level of ambition and how it is matched with effective legal and regulatory tools. Specifically, two questions will structure the discussions:
What would be a reasonable definition and rationale for a ‘complete’ banking union? And what legal reforms would be required to achieve it?
Banking union is a case of a new remit of EU-level policy that so far has been established on the basis of long pre-existing treaty stipulations, namely, Article 127(6) TFEU (for banking supervision) and Article 114 TFEU (for crisis management and deposit insurance). Could its completion be similarly carried out through secondary law? Or would a more comprehensive overhaul of the legal architecture be required to ensure legal certainty and legitimacy?
This paper studies the interactions between corporate law and VC exits by acquisitions, an increasingly common source of VC-related litigation. We find that transactions by VC funds under liquidity pressure are characterized by (i) a substantially lower sale price; (ii) a greater probability of industry outsiders as acquirers; (iii) a positive abnormal return for acquirers. These features indicate the existence of fire sales, which satisfy VCs' liquidation preferences but hurt common shareholders, leaving board members with conflicting fiduciary duties and litigation risks. Exploiting an important court ruling that establishes the board’s fiduciary duties to common shareholders as a priority, we find that after the ruling maturing VCs become less likely to exit by fire sales and they distribute cash to their investors less timely. However, VCs experience more difficult fundraising ex-ante, highlighting the potential cost of a common-favoring regime. Overall the evidence has important implications for optimal fiduciary duty design in VC-backed start-ups.
Search costs for lenders when evaluating potential borrowers are driven by the quality of the underwriting model and by access to data. Both have undergone radical change over the last years, due to the advent of big data and machine learning. For some, this holds the promise of inclusion and better access to finance. Invisible prime applicants perform better under AI than under traditional metrics. Broader data and more refined models help to detect them without triggering prohibitive costs. However, not all applicants profit to the same extent. Historic training data shape algorithms, biases distort results, and data as well as model quality are not always assured. Against this background, an intense debate over algorithmic discrimination has developed. This paper takes a first step towards developing principles of fair lending in the age of AI. It submits that there are fundamental difficulties in fitting algorithmic discrimination into the traditional regime of anti-discrimination laws. Received doctrine with its focus on causation is in many cases ill-equipped to deal with algorithmic decision-making under both, disparate treatment, and disparate impact doctrine. The paper concludes with a suggestion to reorient the discussion and with the attempt to outline contours of fair lending law in the age of AI.
Search costs for lenders when evaluating potential borrowers are driven by the quality of the underwriting model and by access to data. Both have undergone radical change over the last years, due to the advent of big data and machine learning. For some, this holds the promise of inclusion and better access to finance. Invisible prime applicants perform better under AI than under traditional metrics. Broader data and more refined models help to detect them without triggering prohibitive costs. However, not all applicants profit to the same extent. Historic training data shape algorithms, biases distort results, and data as well as model quality are not always assured. Against this background, an intense debate over algorithmic discrimination has developed. This paper takes a first step towards developing principles of fair lending in the age of AI. It submits that there are fundamental difficulties in fitting algorithmic discrimination into the traditional regime of anti-discrimination laws. Received doctrine with its focus on causation is in many cases ill-equipped to deal with algorithmic decision-making under both, disparate treatment, and disparate impact doctrine. The paper concludes with a suggestion to reorient the discussion and with the attempt to outline contours of fair lending law in the age of AI.
Large companies are increasingly on trial. Over the last decade, many of the world’s biggest firms have been embroiled in legal disputes over corruption charges, financial fraud, environmental damage, taxation issues or sanction violations, ending in convictions or settlements of record-breaking fines, well above the billion-dollar mark. For critics of globalization, this turn towards corporate accountability is a welcome sea-change showing that multinational companies are no longer above the law. For legal experts, the trend is noteworthy because of the extraterritorial dimensions of law enforcement, as companies are increasingly held accountable for activities independent of their nationality or the place of the activities. Indeed, the global trend required understanding the evolution of corporate criminal law enforcement in the United States in particular, where authorities have skillfully expanded its effective jurisdiction beyond its territory. This paper traces the evolution of corporate prosecutions in the United States. Analyzing federal prosecution data, it then shows that foreign firms are more likely to pay a fine, which is on average 6,6 times larger.
Energy efficiency represents one of the key planned actions aiming at reducing greenhouse emissions and the consumption of fossil fuel to mitigate the impact of climate change. In this paper, we investigate the relationship between energy efficiency and the borrower’s solvency risk in the Italian market. Specifically, we analyze a residential mortgage portfolio of four financial institutions which includes about 70,000 loans matched with the energy performance certificate of the associated buildings. Our findings show that there is a negative relationship between a building’s energy efficiency and the owner’s probability of default. Findings survive after we account for dwelling, household, mortgage, market control variables, and regional and year fixed effect. Additionally, a ROC analysis shows that there is an improvement in the estimation of the mortgage default probability when the energy efficiency characteristic is included as a risk predictor in the model.
In den letzten zwei Jahrzehnten sind Anmeldungen von Rechten des geistigen Eigentums (intellectual property, IP) bzw. Verletzungsklagen wiederholt an der unzureichenden Bestimmtheit des exklusiv beanspruchten Gegenstands gescheitert. Ihren Ausgang nahm diese Entwicklung im Markenrecht mit Entscheidungen des EuGH (Stichworte: Sieckmann, Heidelberger Bauchemie, Dyson, IP Translator, Oy Hartwall) und später auch des BGH (Stichwort: UHU). Die markenrechtlichen Grundsätze strahlten auf das Designrecht (Stichworte: Sporthelm, Mast-Jägermeister) und zuletzt auch auf das Urheberrecht (Stichwort: Levola) aus. Im Folgenden werden die maßgeblichen Urteile zur Schutzfähigkeit von Zeichen, Designs und Werken zusammengetragen und systematisiert. Dabei treten zwei Aspekte eines Bestimmtheitsgebots zu Tage, die, wie abschließend zu zeigen sein wird, auch im Patentrecht gelten
Der Beitrag bietet einen Überblick über den entstehungsgeschichtlichen Hintergrund sowie den Inhalt des ursprünglichen Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetzes (NetzDG) 2017, seine Wirkungen in der Praxis und die Änderungen durch die NetzDG-Reform 2021. Es wird gezeigt, dass aus einem Regelwerk mit engem Fokus auf die Durchsetzung des Strafrechts in OnlineNetzwerken ein Plattformregulierungsgesetz wurde, das sowohl Löschgebote (Strafrecht) als auch Löschverbote (Meinungsfreiheit) prozeduralisiert. Während das NetzDG 2017 keinen nennenswerten Niederschlag in gerichtlichen oder behördlichen Entscheidungen fand und inzwischen auch kaum noch eine Rolle in der Löschpraxis der Netzwerke spielt, dürfte es dazu beigetragen haben, dass die Netzwerkbetreiber ihre privaten Kommunikationsregeln verschärft haben. Hintergrund für diese „Flucht in die AGB“ ist, dass die großen Netzwerkbetreiber und der Gesetzgeber dasselbe Nahziel verfolgen: Einer Verrohung der Debattenkultur soll aus ökonomischen bzw. gesellschaftspolitischen Gründen entgegengewirkt werden. Der Beitrag schließt mit einem Ausblick auf den Digital Services Act (DSA), mit dem der Compliance-Ansatz des NetzDG europäisiert würde.
This policy note summarizes our assessment of financial sanctions against Russia. We see an increase in sanctions severity starting from (1) the widely discussed SWIFT exclusions, followed by (2) blocking of correspondent banking relationships with Russian banks, including the Central Bank, alongside secondary sanctions, and (3) a full blacklisting of the ‘real’ export-import flows underlying the financial transactions. We assess option (1) as being less impactful than often believed yet sending a strong signal of EU unity; option (2) as an effective way to isolate the Russian banking system, particularly if secondary sanctions are in place, to avoid workarounds. Option (3) represents possibly the most effective way to apply economic and financial pressure, interrupting trade relationships.