Working Paper
Refine
Year of publication
- 2022 (126) (remove)
Document Type
- Working Paper (126) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (126)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (126)
Keywords
- Covid-19 (4)
- Digital Services Act (4)
- ESG (4)
- Digitalisierung (3)
- Mobilität (3)
- climate change (3)
- AI borrower classification (2)
- AI enabled credit scoring (2)
- Artificial Intelligence (2)
- Asset Pricing (2)
- Banking Union (2)
- Big Data (2)
- COVID-19 (2)
- Corona-Pandemie (2)
- DSA (2)
- Desinformation (2)
- Disclosure (2)
- European Central Bank (2)
- European Parliament (2)
- Experiment (2)
- Experten (2)
- FOMC (2)
- FinTech (2)
- Financial Regulation (2)
- Finanzkrise (2)
- Flüchtlinge (2)
- Forschung (2)
- Gesundheit (2)
- Hassrede (2)
- Household Finance (2)
- Klimawandel (2)
- Krise (2)
- Market Liquidity (2)
- Medienberichterstattung (2)
- Nachhaltigkeit (2)
- Performance (2)
- Politikberatung (2)
- Russia (2)
- SWIFT (2)
- Sustainability (2)
- Transparency (2)
- Ukraine (2)
- Wissenschaftskommunikation (2)
- accountability (2)
- brown-spinning (2)
- climate (2)
- credit scoring methodology (2)
- credit scoring regulation (2)
- financial privacy (2)
- institutional investors (2)
- natural gas (2)
- peer effects (2)
- political economy (2)
- politische Reformen (2)
- portfolio management (2)
- price stability (2)
- private companies (2)
- private equity (2)
- responsible lending (2)
- social media (2)
- statistical discrimination (2)
- sustainability (2)
- uncertainty (2)
- 13F filings (1)
- 2-Sector Model (1)
- 401(k) plan (1)
- Accounting (1)
- Acquisitions (1)
- Affordability crisis (1)
- Akzeptanzuntersuchung (1)
- Akzeptierbarkeit (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Art investment (1)
- Art. 17 DSM-Richtlinie (1)
- Asset prices (1)
- Bailin (1)
- Bank Accounting (1)
- Bank's Balance Sheets (1)
- Banks (1)
- Bayesian Estimation (1)
- Behavioral Finance (1)
- Behavioral Measurement (1)
- Beliefs (1)
- Beliefs and Choice (1)
- Bestimmtheit (1)
- Bias in medical research (1)
- Biased Beliefs (1)
- Big Five (1)
- Big Five Personality (1)
- Big Techs (1)
- Big Three (1)
- Big data (1)
- Blockchain (1)
- Broker (1)
- Business Subsidies (1)
- CBDC (1)
- CECL (1)
- Carbon Taxation (1)
- Cash (1)
- Caste (1)
- Causal Machine Learning (1)
- Chihuahuan Desert (1)
- Choice under Risk (1)
- Cholesky decomposition (1)
- Climate Change (1)
- Coalitions (1)
- Colocation (1)
- Complex Financial Instruments (1)
- Consulting (1)
- Consumer Welfare (1)
- Content ID (1)
- Corporate Governance (1)
- Corporate concentration (1)
- Covid pandemic (1)
- Cryptocurrencies (1)
- Cultural Economics (1)
- Cultural Finance (1)
- Cultural Norms (1)
- Customer data sharing (1)
- DMA (1)
- DSGE (1)
- DSGE models (1)
- Data access (1)
- Data portability (1)
- Dienst der Informationsgesellschaft (1)
- Digital Markets Act (1)
- Digital footprints (1)
- Disclosure regulation (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Dyson (1)
- ESM (1)
- Economic and Monetary Union (1)
- Eindeutigkeit (1)
- Empirical Contract Theory (1)
- Energy Embargo (1)
- Enriched Digital Footprint (1)
- Environmental (1)
- Environmental, social, and governance factors (ESG) (1)
- Estimation (1)
- Ethics (1)
- European Banking Union (1)
- European Capital Markets Union (1)
- European Commision (1)
- European Commission (1)
- European Investment Bank (1)
- European Stability Mechanism (1)
- European integration (1)
- Eurozone (1)
- Execution Cost (1)
- Exklusion (1)
- Expected credit losses (1)
- Externalities (1)
- Factor Models (1)
- Fahrradinfrastruktur (1)
- Fiduciary Duties (1)
- FinTech and Textual Analysis (1)
- Financial Markets (1)
- Financial Supervision (1)
- Financial interests (1)
- Fintech (1)
- Fire Sales (1)
- Fixed Income (1)
- Forecasting (1)
- Frankfurt am Main (1)
- Fraud (1)
- Fund family (1)
- Gambling (1)
- Gemeinschaftliches Wohnen (1)
- Gemeinwohl (1)
- Generationenrente (1)
- Generations (1)
- Global Optimization (1)
- Governance (1)
- Green Nudging (1)
- Green Quantitative Easing (1)
- Greenwashing (1)
- Hate Speech (1)
- Haushaltsbefragung (1)
- Headline (1)
- Heterogeneous Agents (1)
- Heterogeneous Firms (1)
- High-Frequency Trading (1)
- High-dimensional Methods (1)
- History & Finance (1)
- Household finance (1)
- IFRS 9 (1)
- IPS (1)
- IV (1)
- IV approach (1)
- Idiosyncratic Risk (1)
- Impairments (1)
- Incomplete Contracts (1)
- Institutional Investor (1)
- Integrated Assessment Model (1)
- Inter-ethnic Conflict (1)
- Invasion (1)
- Klarheit (1)
- Krisenprotokoll (1)
- LBO spillovers (1)
- Lending (1)
- Levola (1)
- Life insurance companies (1)
- Limited Commitment (1)
- Limited Enforcement (1)
- Limits to Arbitrage (1)
- Liquidation Preferences (1)
- Liquidity (1)
- Liquidity Risk (1)
- Loans (1)
- Long-run risk (1)
- Lottery stocks (1)
- Maastricht criteria (1)
- Management (1)
- Marginal Propensity to Consume (1)
- Market Fragmentation (1)
- Market Microstructure (1)
- Market Quality (1)
- Marketplace lending (1)
- Methodenbericht (1)
- MiCA (1)
- Middle East and North Africa (1)
- Mixed-frequency data (1)
- Mobilitätsverhalten (1)
- Model-based regulation (1)
- Monitoring (1)
- Monte Carlo Methods (1)
- Morality (1)
- NFT (1)
- NetzDG (1)
- Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz (1)
- Neuaufteilung öffentlicher Räume (1)
- Non-Compete Agreements (1)
- Non-Fungible Tokens (1)
- Numerical accuracy (1)
- Online Poker (1)
- Online-Plattformen (1)
- Open banking (1)
- Option-implied Risk (1)
- Organizational Economics (1)
- Overblocking (1)
- P2P lending (1)
- Paycheck Protection Program (1)
- Paycheck Sensitivity (1)
- Persistence (1)
- Personnel Economics (1)
- Pivotality (1)
- Plattform (1)
- Policy Center (1)
- Political Economy (1)
- Portfolio optimization (1)
- Price elasticity of gasoline demand (1)
- Pricing Determinants (1)
- Product returns (1)
- Prosociality (1)
- Public Finance (1)
- Random Route (1)
- Random-Route-Verfahren (1)
- Real estate (1)
- Reallocation (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Religion (1)
- Rents (1)
- Research and development (1)
- Retail Challenge (1)
- Retail investors (1)
- Ridepooling (1)
- Risikomanagement (1)
- Risikominderung (1)
- Risk Attitudes (1)
- Risk Preferences (1)
- Risk Sharing (1)
- Robo-Advising (1)
- Russian Sanction (1)
- Rücklaufquote (1)
- SME Trading (1)
- SRB (1)
- SRF (1)
- SVAR (1)
- Sanctions (1)
- Securities Market Regulation (1)
- Short-run and long-run inflation expectations (1)
- Short-time work (1)
- Sieckmann (1)
- Social (1)
- Social Capital (1)
- Social Conditioning (1)
- Social Impact (1)
- Social Learning (1)
- Social Security claiming (1)
- Socially responsible investments (1)
- Solution methods (1)
- Solvency regulation (1)
- Soziale Teilhabe / Partizipation (1)
- Sporthelm (1)
- Stability and Growth Pact (1)
- States (1)
- Stationary Equilibrium (1)
- Subsidization (1)
- Supervision (1)
- Supply Chain (1)
- Survey Data (1)
- Swiss Army Knife (1)
- Temporal aggregation (1)
- Textual Analysis (1)
- Time Inconsistency (1)
- Time Preferences (1)
- Trados (1)
- Transaction Data (1)
- Trust (1)
- Universal banks (1)
- Venture Capital (1)
- Venture capital (1)
- Verhaltenskodex (1)
- Verkehr (1)
- Verkehrspolitik (1)
- Verkehrspolitische Maßnahmen (1)
- Vermittlungsdienst, (1)
- Vernetzung (1)
- Vertrauen (1)
- Volcker Rule (1)
- Wettbewerbsrecht (1)
- Wirksamkeit (1)
- annuity (1)
- art (1)
- asset valuation (1)
- asymmetric information (1)
- auctions (1)
- bail-in (1)
- bank regulation (1)
- bank resolution (1)
- banking (1)
- banking union (1)
- banknotes (1)
- banks (1)
- based on a single specimen (1)
- belief formation (1)
- beliefs (1)
- betting (1)
- biases (1)
- big data (1)
- bitcoin (1)
- blockchain (1)
- bond market liquidity (1)
- bureaucrats' incentives (1)
- business cycle (1)
- capital markets (1)
- capital regulation (1)
- capital requirements (1)
- central bank communication (1)
- civil war (1)
- climate-related disclosures (1)
- coal (1)
- collateral reuse (1)
- common ownership (1)
- computer vision (1)
- computer visionbiases (1)
- concept and conceptions of trust (1)
- conditionality (1)
- conflict (1)
- contentious politics (1)
- continuous limit order book (1)
- core (1)
- credit risk (1)
- creditors runs (1)
- crises (1)
- cross-equation restrictions of rational expectations (1)
- cross-section (1)
- cryptocurrencies (1)
- debt cost (1)
- democracy (1)
- deposit guarantee scheme (1)
- derivatives (1)
- diesel (1)
- digital planning tool (1)
- digitale Geschäftsmodelle (1)
- disagreement (1)
- disaster risk (1)
- discourse analysis (1)
- discrimination (1)
- economic governance (1)
- economies of scale (1)
- electricity (1)
- endogeneity (1)
- energy crisis (1)
- equity cost (1)
- experts (1)
- external instruments (1)
- factorization of matrix polynomials (1)
- filtering (1)
- finance (1)
- finance and development (1)
- finance wage premium (1)
- financial distress (1)
- financial solidarity (1)
- fintech (1)
- fiscal rules (1)
- fiscal solidarity (1)
- frequent batch auctions (1)
- gasoline (1)
- gasoline supply (1)
- gasoline tax (1)
- geistiges Eigentum (1)
- geo-economics (1)
- government bonds (1)
- green financing (1)
- high-frequency trading (1)
- identification (1)
- index funds (1)
- inequality (1)
- inflation (1)
- inflation expectations (1)
- inflation surge (1)
- insider trading (1)
- institutions (1)
- investment behavior (1)
- investment decisions (1)
- investment forum (1)
- investor coalitions (1)
- jet fuel (1)
- justification (1)
- kapitalgedeckte Alterssicherung (1)
- labelling (1)
- latency arbitrage (1)
- leverage constraint (1)
- life expectancy (1)
- liquidity provision (1)
- loanable funds (1)
- longevity (1)
- machine learning (1)
- market design (1)
- market microstructure (1)
- market supervision (1)
- market-making (1)
- monetary policy (1)
- monetary policy rule (1)
- monetary system (1)
- monetary transmission (1)
- money (1)
- money creation (1)
- moral hazar (1)
- motivated reasoning (1)
- national interest (1)
- neoinstitutionalism (1)
- net zero transition (1)
- net-zero transition (1)
- normative orders (1)
- oil (1)
- opinion (1)
- orthogonalization (1)
- ownership disclosure (1)
- pass-through (1)
- passive investors (1)
- pathogenic lichenicolous fungi (1)
- pensions (1)
- persistent or transitory inflation shock (1)
- polarization (1)
- policy reform (1)
- policy rule (1)
- politicization (1)
- profit weights (1)
- property rights (1)
- proprietary trading (1)
- randomized control trial (1)
- randomized controlled trial (1)
- rebel governance (1)
- reconciliation of Lucas's advocacy of rational-expectations modelling and policy predictions and Sims's advocacy of VAR modelling (1)
- recursive utility (1)
- regulation (1)
- rehypothecation (1)
- repo market (1)
- retirement (1)
- retirement expectations (1)
- retirement planning (1)
- risk preference (1)
- safe assets (1)
- saving behavior (1)
- savings banks (1)
- securities lending (1)
- sharing economy (1)
- simultaneity (1)
- skill-biased technological change (1)
- sniping (1)
- social impact (1)
- social movements (1)
- social networks (1)
- sovereign bonds (1)
- sovereign debt (1)
- stabilization (1)
- stock market investment (1)
- structural power (1)
- städtebauliches Instrument (1)
- survey (1)
- survey experiment (1)
- survey forecasts (1)
- sustainability disclosures (1)
- tax arbitrage (1)
- taxes (1)
- trust (1)
- venture capital (1)
- worker-firm panels (1)
Institute
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (99)
- Center for Financial Studies (CFS) (83)
- Sustainable Architecture for Finance in Europe (SAFE) (81)
- House of Finance (HoF) (69)
- Foundation of Law and Finance (24)
- Rechtswissenschaft (21)
- Institute for Monetary and Financial Stability (IMFS) (14)
- Exzellenzcluster Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen (6)
- Geographie (5)
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (4)
Global consensus is growing on the contribution that corporations and finance must make towards the net-zero transition in line with the Paris Agreement goals. However, most efforts in legislative instruments as well as shareholder or stakeholder initiatives have ultimately focused on public companies: for example, most disclosure obligations result from the given company’s status of being listed on a stock exchange.
This article argues that such a focus falls short of providing a comprehensive approach to the problem of climate change. In doing so, it examines the contribution of private companies to climate change, the relevance of climate risks for them, as well as the phenomenon of brown-spinning. We show that one cannot afford to ignore private companies in the net-zero transition and climate change adaptation. Yet, private companies lack several disciplining mechanisms available to public companies such as institutional investor engagement, certain corporate governance arrangements, and transparency through regular disclosure obligations. At this stage, only some generic regulatory instruments such as carbon pricing and environmental regulation apply to them. The article closes with a discussion of the main policy implications. Primarily, we propose extending sustainability disclosure requirements to private companies.
Sustainability disclosures aim at promoting a transition to a greener economy, rather than (only) protecting investors by addressing information asymmetry. Therefore, these disclosures should encompass private companies that are of relevance for the net-zero transition. Such disclosures can be a powerful tool in shedding light on the polluting private companies that have so far been in the dark as well as serving as a disciplining mechanism.
Der Koalitionsvertrag 2021 sieht eine generationengerechte Absicherung des Rentenniveaus durch eine teilweise aus Haushaltsmitteln finanzierte Kapitaldeckung vor. Um dieses Ziel zu verwirklichen, wird hier die Einführung einer Generationenrente ab Geburt vorgeschlagen. Dabei wird aus Haushaltsmitteln ein Betrag von € 5.000 für jedes Neugeborene nach Grundsätzen des professionellen Anlagemanagements am globalen Kapitalmarkt angelegt. Konzeptionell soll sich diese Generationenrente am Modell der Basisrente(§10 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 b EStG) orientieren, d.h. die akkumulierten Gelder sind weder beleihbar, vererbbar noch übertragbar und können frühestens ab Alter 63 zugunsten einer lebenslangen Monatsrente verwendet werden. Unsere Berechnungen zeigen, dass durch die hier vorgeschlagene Generationenrente unabhängig vom Verlauf der individuellen Erwerbsbiographie, Altersarmut für die vom demographischen Wandel besonders betroffenen zukünftigen Generationen vermieden wird.
Spillovers of PE investments
(2022)
In this paper, we investigate a primary potential impact of leveraged buyout (LBOs) transactions: the effects of LBOs on the peers of the LBO target in the same industry. Using a data sample based on US LBO transactions between 1985 and 2016, we investigate the impact of the peer firms in the aftermath of the transaction, relative to non-peer firms. To account for potential endogeneity concerns, we employ a network-based instrumental variable approach. Based on this analysis, we find support for the proposition that LBOs do indeed matter for peer firms’ performance and corporate strategy relative to non-peer firms. Our study supports a learning factor hypothesis: peers gain by learning from the LBO target to improve their operational performance. Conversely, we find no evidence to support the conjecture that peers lose due to the increased competitiveness of the LBO target firm.
The present paper proposes an overview of the existing literature covering several aspects related to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors. Specifically, we consider studies describing and evaluating ESG methodologies and those studying the impact of ESG on credit risk, debt and equity costs, or sovereign bonds. We further expand the topic of ESG research by including the strand of the literature focusing on the impact of climate change on financial stability, thus allowing us to also consider the most recent research on the impact of climate change on portfolio management.
The reuse of collateral can support the efficient allocation of safe assets in the financial system. Exploiting a novel dataset, we show that banks substantially increase their reuse of sovereign bonds in response to scarcity induced by Eurosystem asset purchases. While repo rates react little to purchase-induced scarcity when reuse is low, they become increasingly sensitive at high levels of reuse. An elevated reuse rate is also associated with more failures to deliver and a higher volatility of repo rates in the cross-section of bonds. Our results highlight the trade-off between shock absorption and shock amplification effects of collateral reuse.
We investigate whether the bank crisis management framework of the European banking union can effectively bar the detrimental influence of national interests in cross-border bank failures. We find that both the internal governance structure and decision making procedure of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) and the interplay between the SRB and national resolution authorities in the implementation of supranationally devised resolution schemes provide inroads that allow opposing national interests to obstruct supranational resolution. We also show that the Single Resolution Fund (SRG), even after the ratification of the reform of the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) and the introduction of the SRF backstop facility, is inapt to overcome these frictions. We propose a full supranationalization of resolution decision making. This would allow European authorities in charge of bank crisis management to operate autonomously and achieve socially optimal outcomes beyond national borders.
Agencies around the world are in the process of developing taxonomies and standards for sustainable (or ESG) investment products. A key assumption in our model is that of non-consequentialist private investors (households) who derive a "warm glow" decisional utility when purchasing an investment product that is labelled as sustainable. We ask when such labelling is socially beneficial even when the socialplanner can impose a minimum standard on investment and production. In a model of financial constraints (Holmström and Tirole 1997), which we close to include consumer surplus, we also determine the optimal labelling threshold and show how its stringency is affected by determinants such as the prevalence of warm-glow investor preferences, the presence of social network effects, or the relevance of financial constraints at the industry level.
Joint Institutional Frameworks in bilateral relations are circumscribed in policy scope, can lack adequate instruments for dynamic adaptation and provide limited access to decision-making processes internal to the contracting parties. Informal governance, the involvement of private actors as well as rules such as equivalence provide avenues to remedy these limits in bilateral relations in sectoral governance. Through bilateral agreements, the scope of territorially bound political authority is expanded. The formalised and institutionalised frameworks and bodies established are, however, frequently accompanied by mechanisms of informal cooperation and special rules either to cover policy fields where no contractual relation exists, to provide for flexible solutions where needed, or to involve both public and private actors that otherwise do not have access to formal decision-making bodies. This SAFE working paper conceptualises formal and informal modes of cooperation and varying actor constellations. It discusses their relevance for the case of bilateral relations between the European Union (EU) and Switzerland in sectoral governance. More specifically, it draws lessons from EU-Swiss sectoral governance of financial and electricity markets for the future relations of the EU with the United Kingdom (UK). The findings suggest that there are distinct governance arrangements across sectors, while the patterns of sectoral governance are expected to look very much alike in the United Kingdom and Switzerland in the years to come. The general takeaway is that Brexit will have repercussions for the EU’s external relations with other third countries, putting ever more emphasis on formal and rule-based approaches, while leaving a need for sector-specific cross border co-operation.
Debt levels in the eurozone have reached new record highs. The member countries have tried to cushion the economic consequences of the corona pandemic with a massive increase in government spending. End of 2021 public debt in relation to GDP will approach 100% on average. There are various calls to abolish or soften the Maastricht rules of limiting sovereign debt. We see the risk of a new sovereign debt crisis in this decade if it is not possible to bring public debt down to an acceptable level. Our new fiscal rule would be suitable and appropriate for this purpose, because obviously the Maastricht criteria have failed. In contrast to the rigid 3% Maastricht-criterion, our rule is flexible and it addresses the main problem: excessively high public debt ratios. And it lowers the existing incentives for highly indebted governments to exert expansionary pressure on monetary policy. If obeyed strictly, our rule reinforces the snowball effect and reduces the excessively high debt ratios within a manageable period, even if nominal growth is weak. This is confirmed by simulations with different scenarios as well as with the hypothetical application of the new fiscal rule to eurozone economies from 2022 to 2026. Finally, we take up the recent proposal by ESM economists to increase the permissible debt ratio from 60 to 100% of GDP in the eurozone.
Why bank money creation?
(2022)
We provide a rationale for bank money creation in our current monetary system by investigating its merits over a system with banks as intermediaries of loanable funds. The latter system could result when CBDCs are introduced. In the loanable funds system, households limit banks’ leverage ratios when providing deposits to make sure they have enough “skin in the game” to opt for loan monitoring. When there is unobservable heterogeneity among banks with regard to their (opportunity) costs from monitoring, aggregate lending to bank-dependent firms is inefficiently low. A monetary system with bank money creation alleviates this problem, as banks can initiate lending by creating bank deposits without relying on household funding. With a suitable regulatory leverage constraint, the gains from higher lending by banks with a high repayment pledgeability outweigh losses from banks which are less diligent in monitoring. Bank-risk assessments, combined with appropriate risk-sensitive capital requirements, can reduce or even eliminate such losses.
Im Herbst 2020 wurden im Rahmen des vom Land Hessen geförderten LOEWE-Schwerpunktes „Infrastruktur – Design – Gesellschaft“ zwei Haushaltsbefragungen durchgeführt mit dem Ziel, die Akzeptanz und Wirkung verkehrspolitischer Maßnahmen zur Neuaufteilung öffentlicher Räume in Frankfurt am Main zu untersuchen. In der ersten (postalischen) Befragung (N = 853) wurden in den vier Befragungsgebieten Altstadt/Sachsenhausen-Nord, Nordend, Eschersheim und Bonames/Nieder-Eschbach mithilfe des Random-Route-Verfahrens Fragebögen verteilt. In der parallel dazu stattfindenden reinen Onlinebefragung (N = 1.422) wurden alle Frankfurter Stadtteile angesprochen.
Ziel des Berichts ist es, die methodische Vorgehensweise der Erstellung, Durchführung und Auswertung der Erhebung zu beschreiben. Dazu werden die thematischen Schwerpunkte und Zielsetzungen der beiden Befragungen erläutert, die Vorgehensweise bei der Verteilung und Verbreitung der Befragungen und des Pretests sowie die Aufbereitung der Datensätze. Weiterhin werden der Rücklauf und die Repräsentativität der Stichproben analysiert und zuletzt potentielle Fehlerquellen thematisiert.
Search costs for lenders when evaluating potential borrowers are driven by the quality of the underwriting model and by access to data. Both have undergone radical change over the last years, due to the advent of big data and machine learning. For some, this holds the promise of inclusion and better access to finance. Invisible prime applicants perform better under AI than under traditional metrics. Broader data and more refined models help to detect them without triggering prohibitive costs. However, not all applicants profit to the same extent. Historic training data shape algorithms, biases distort results, and data as well as model quality are not always assured. Against this background, an intense debate over algorithmic discrimination has developed. This paper takes a first step towards developing principles of fair lending in the age of AI. It submits that there are fundamental difficulties in fitting algorithmic discrimination into the traditional regime of anti-discrimination laws. Received doctrine with its focus on causation is in many cases ill-equipped to deal with algorithmic decision-making under both, disparate treatment, and disparate impact doctrine. The paper concludes with a suggestion to reorient the discussion and with the attempt to outline contours of fair lending law in the age of AI.
In this publication, researchers from the social and economic sciences and medicine as well as practitioners from the media and politics reflect on the influence of scientific expertise in times of crisis. Differences and similarities between the Covid-19 pandemic, the financial and economic crisis, the refugee crisis and the climate crisis are elaborated. The interviews were conducted in November/December 2021.
In der Publikation reflektieren Forschenden aus den Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Medizin sowie Praktiker aus Medien und Politik den Einfluss wissenschaftlicher Expertise in Krisenzeiten. Dabei werden Unterschiede und Gemeinsamkeiten zwischen der Covid-19-Pandemie, der Finanz- und Wirtschaftskrise, der Flüchtlingskrise und der Klimakrise herausgearbeitet. Die Gespräche wurden im November/Dezember 2021 geführt.
With open banking, consumers take greater control over their own financial data and share it at their discretion. Using a rich set of loan application data from the largest German FinTech lender in consumer credit, this paper studies what characterizes borrowers who share data and assesses its impact on loan application outcomes. I show that riskier borrowers share data more readily, which subsequently leads to an increase in the probability of loan approval and a reduction in interest rates. The effects hold across all credit risk profiles but are the most pronounced for borrowers with lower credit scores (a higher increase in loan approval rate) and higher credit scores (a larger reduction in interest rate). I also find that standard variables used in credit scoring explain substantially less variation in loan application outcomes when customers share data. Overall, these findings suggest that open banking improves financial inclusion, and also provide policy implications for regulators engaged in the adoption or extension of open banking policies.
The authors focus on the stabilizing role of cash from a society-wide perspective. Starting with conceptual remarks on the importance of money for the economy in general, special attention is paid to the unique characteristics of cash. As these become apparent especially during crisis periods, a comparison of the Great Depression (1929 – 1933) and the Great Recession 2008/09 shows the devastating effects of a severe monetary contraction and how a fully elastic provision of cash can help to avoid such a situation.
The authors find interesting similarities to both crises in two separate case studies, one on the demonetization in India 2016 and the other on cash supply during various crises in Greece since 2008. The paper concludes that supply-driven cash withdrawals from circulation (either by demonetization or by capital controls) destabilize the economy if electronic payment substitutes are not instantly available.
However, as there is no perfect substitute for cash due to its unique properties, from the viewpoint of the society as a whole an efficient payment mix necessarily includes cash: It helps to stabilize the economy not only in times of crises in general, no matter which government is in place. The authors argue that it should be the undisputed task of central banks to ensure that cash remains in circulation in normal times and is provided in a fully elastic way in times of crisis.
With free delivery of products virtually being a standard in E-commerce, product returns pose a major challenge for online retailers and society. For retailers, product returns involve significant transportation, labor, disposal, and administrative costs. From a societal perspective, product returns contribute to greenhouse gas emissions and packaging disposal and are often a waste of natural resources. Therefore, reducing product returns has become a key challenge. This paper develops and validates a novel smart green nudging approach to tackle the problem of product returns during customers’ online shopping processes. We combine a green nudge with a novel data enrichment strategy and a modern causal machine learning method. We first run a large-scale randomized field experiment in the online shop of a German fashion retailer to test the efficacy of a novel green nudge. Subsequently, we fuse the data from about 50,000 customers with publicly-available aggregate data to create what we call enriched digital footprints and train a causal machine learning system capable of optimizing the administration of the green nudge. We report two main findings: First, our field study shows that the large-scale deployment of a simple, low-cost green nudge can significantly reduce product returns while increasing retailer profits. Second, we show how a causal machine learning system trained on the enriched digital footprint can amplify the effectiveness of the green nudge by “smartly” administering it only to certain types of customers. Overall, this paper demonstrates how combining a low-cost marketing instrument, a privacy-preserving data enrichment strategy, and a causal machine learning method can create a win-win situation from both an environmental and economic perspective by simultaneously reducing product returns and increasing retailers’ profits.
Short sale bans may improve market quality during crises: new evidence from the 2020 Covid crash
(2022)
In theory, banning short selling stabilizes stock prices but undermines pricing efficiency and has ambiguous impacts on market liquidity. Empirical studies find mixed and conflicting results. This paper leverages cross-country policy variation during the 2020 Covid crisis to assess differential impacts of bans on stock liquidity, prices, and volatility. Results suggest that bans improved liquidity and stabilized prices for illiquid stocks but temporarily diminished liquidity for highly liquid stocks.The findings support theories in which short sale bans may improve liquidity by selectively filtering out informed— potentially predatory—traders. Thus, policies that target the most illiquid stocks may deliver better overall market quality than uniform short sale bans imposed on all stocks.
This paper challenges widespread assumptions in trust research according to which trust and conflict are opposing terms or where trust is generally seen as a value. Rather, it argues that trust is only valuable if properly justified, and it places such justifications in contexts of social and political conflict. For these purposes, the paper suggests a distinction between a general concept and various conceptions of trust, and it defines the concept as a four-place one. With regard to the justification of trust, a distinction between internal and full justification is introduced, and the justification of trust is linked to relations of justification between trusters and trusted. Finally, trust in conflict(s) emerges were such relations exist among the parties of a conflict, often by way of institutional mediation.
We propose a new instrument for estimating the price elasticity of gasoline demand that exploits systematic differences across U.S. states in the pass-through of oil price shocks to retail gasoline prices. These differences, which are primarily driven by variation in the cost of producing and distributing gasoline, create cross-sectional dispersion in gasoline price growth in response to an aggregate oil price shock. We find that the elasticity was stable near -0.3 until the end of 2014, but subsequently rose to about -0.2. Our estimates inform the recent debate about gasoline-tax holidays and policies to reduce carbon emissions.