Refine
Year of publication
- 2021 (52) (remove)
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (52) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (52)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (52) (remove)
Keywords
- Virtuelle Hochschule (22)
- Germanistik (7)
- Digitale Lehre (6)
- E-Learning (6)
- Literaturwissenschaft (6)
- Digitalisierung (4)
- Integriertes Lernen (4)
- Lehre (4)
- Deutsch (3)
- Didaktik (3)
Institute
Middle Welsh is a VSO language with the verb before the subject in all kinds of finite clause. However, positive declarative main clauses normally show verb-second order with a constituent of some kind before the finite verb. There are questions about the nature of this restriction. There are also questions about subject-initial sentences, which show surprising agreement properties, whether the subject is a topic or a focused constituent. All these questions can be given plausible answers within HPSG.
Background: Transfusion of red blood cells (RBC) in patients undergoing major elective cranial surgery is associated with increased morbidity, mortality and prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS). This retrospective single center study aims to identify the impact of RBC transfusions on skull-base and non-skull-base meningioma patients including the identification of risk factors for RBC transfusion.
Methods: From October 2009 - October 2016 we retrospectively analyzed 423 primary meningioma patients undergoing surgery for primary meningioma resection our department.
Results: Of these 423 patients, 68 (16.1%) received RBC transfusion and 355 (83.9%) did not receive RBC units. Preoperative anaemia rate was significantly higher in transfused patients (17.7%) compared to patients without RBC transfusion (6.2%; p = 0.0015). In transfused patients, postoperative complications as well as hospital LOS was significantly higher (p < 00001) compared to non-transfused patients. After multivariate analyses, risk factors for RBC transfusion were preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score (p = 0.0247), tumor size (p = 0.0006), surgical time (p = 0.0018) and intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier curves revealed significant influence on overall survival by preoperative anaemia, RBC transfusion, smoking, cardiovascular disease, preoperative KPS ≤ 60% and age (elderly ≥ 75 years).
Conclusion: We concluded that blood loss due to large tumors or localization near large vessels are the main triggers for RBC transfusion in meningioma patients paired with a potential preselection that masks the effect of preoperative anaemia in multivariate analysis. Further studies evaluating the impact of preoperative anaemia management for reduction of RBC transfusion are needed to improve clinical outcomes of meningioma patients.
Study Design: Cross-sectional survey
Objective: To determine the influence of surgeons’ level of experience and subspeciality training on the reliability, reproducibility, and accuracy of sacral fracture classification using the AO Spine Sacral Injury Classification System.
Summary of Background Data: An ideal classification system is easily comprehensible and reliable amongst the diverse group of surgeons. A surgeons’ level of experience may have a significant effect on the reliability and accuracy of a classification system. Moreover, surgeons of different subspecialities may have various levels of comfort with imaging assessment of sacral injuries required for accurate diagnosis and classification.
Methods: High-resolution computerized tomography (CT) images from 26 cases were assessed by 172 investigators from a diverse array of surgical subspecialities (general orthopaedics, neurosurgery, orthopaedic spine, orthopaedic trauma) and experience (<5, 5-10, 11-20, >20 years). Validation assessments were performed via web conference using high-resolution images, as well as axial/sagittal/coronal CT scan sequences. Two assessments were performed by each investigator independently three weeks apart in randomized order. Reliability and reproducibility were calculated with cohen’s kappa coefficient (k) and gold standard classification agreement was determined for each fracture morphology and subtype and stratified by experience and subspeciality.
Results: Respondents achieved an overall k = 0.87 for morphology and k = 0.77 for subtype classification, representing excellent and substantial intraobserver reproducibility, respectively. Respondents from all four practice experience groups demonstrated excellent interobserver reliability when classifying overall morphology (k=0.842/0.850, Assessment 1/Assessment 2) and substantial interobserver reliability in overall subtype (k=0.719/0.751) in both assessments. General orthopaedists, neurosurgeons, and orthopaedic spine surgeons exhibited excellent interobserver reliability in overall morphology classification and substantial interobserver reliability in overall subtype classification. Surgeons in each experience category and subspecialty correctly classified fracture morphology in over 90% of cases and fracture subtype in over 80% of cases according to the gold standard. Correct overall classification of fracture morphology (Assessment 1: p= 0.024, Assessment 2: p=0.006) and subtype (p2<0.001) differed significantly with surgeons with >20 years of experience demonstrating increased difficulty correctly classifying all fracture subtypes overall in comparison to the other experience groups. Correct overall classification did not significantly differ by subspecialty.
Conclusions: Overall, the AO Spine Sacral Injury Classification System appears to be universally applicable among surgeons of various subspecialties and levels of experience with acceptable reliability, reproducibility, and accuracy.
Disclosures: author 1: none; author 2: consultant=Medtronic, Nuvasive, ISD, Asutra, Stryker, Bioventus, Zimmer, teledocs, Clinical Spine Surgery, AOSpine ; author 3: none; author 4: grants/research support=AOSpine, consultant=DPS, icotec; author 5: none; author 6: none; author 7: grants/research support=DPS; author 8: none; author 9: grants/research support=NIH, RTI, CSRS, royalties=Inion ; author 10: stock/shareholder=Advanced Spinal Intellectual Properties; Atlas Spine; Avaz Surgical; Bonovo Orthopaedics; Computational Biodynamics; Cytonics; Deep Health; Dimension Orthotics LLC; Electrocore; Flagship Surgical; FlowPharma; Globus; Innovative Surgical Design; Insight Therapeutics; Jushi; Nuvasive; Orthobullets; Paradigm Spine; Parvizi Surgical Innovation; Progressive Spinal Technologies; Replication Medica; Spine Medica; Spineology; Stout Medical; Vertiflex; ViewFi Health, royalties=Aesculap; Atlas Spine; Globus; Medtronics; SpineWave; Stryker Spine,other financial report=AO Spine
Background: To investigate whether patients with critical emergency conditions are seeking or receiving the medical care that they require we characterized the reality of care for patients presenting with Neuro-emergencies during the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: In this observational, longitudinal cohort study, all neurosurgical admissions that presented to our Department between February 1st and April 15th during the COVID-19 pandemic and during the same time-period in 2019 were identified and categorized according to the presence of a Neuro-emergency, the route of admission, management, and the category of disease. Further, the clinical course of patients with chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) was investigated as a Neuro-emergency representative for a wide variety of semi-urgent symptoms.
Results: During the pandemic, the percentage of Neuro-emergencies among all neurosurgical admissions remained similar as in 2019 but a larger proportion presented through the emergency department than through the outpatient clinic or by referral (*p=0.009). The total number of Neuro-emergencies was significantly reduced (*p=0.0007) across all types of disease, particularly in severe vascular (*p=0.036) but also in spinal (*p=0.007) and hydrocephalus (*p=0.048) emergencies. Strikingly, elderly patients with cSDH and mild to moderate symptoms presented less frequently, with more severe symptoms (*p=0.046) and were less likely to reach favorable outcome (*p=0.003).
Conclusions: Despite pandemic-related restrictive measures and reallocation of resources, patients with Neuro-emergencies should be encouraged to present regardless of the severity of symptoms because deferred presentation may result in adverse outcome. Thus, conservation of critical healthcare resources remains essential in spite fighting COVID-19.
Objective: Nationwide data on the epidemiology, treatment characteristics, and long-term outcome of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) in Germany is not yet existing. Neurosurgeons from the German Neurosurgery Society (DGNC) and traumatologists from the German Trauma Society (DGU), therefore, joined forces in 2016 to conceptualize a TBI module for the well-established Trauma Register of the DGU (TR-DGU). Here, we report how this “German National TBI registry (GNTR)” has been developed, implemented, and tested in a recently completed pilot period.
Methods: The conception and implementation process of the GNTR from August 2016 to February 2019 is described, and results of its 23-months long pilot period from February 2019 to December 2020 are presented. For the pilot period, TBI patients were prospectively enrolled at nine neurosurgical and traumatological hospitals across Germany. Inclusion criteria were treatment on the ICU ≥ 24h, or an ISS score ≥ 16. A variety of clinical, imaging, and laboratory parameters were collected, and the GOSE score was used to assess the outcome at discharge and 6- and 12 months follow-up.
Results: Details on the structure and dataset of the GNTR as well as milestones and pitfalls during its conception and implementation, are outlined. During the pilot period, a total of 264 TBI patients were enrolled. Their demographic characteristics, clinical, imaging, and radiological findings, and their early mortality and functional outcome are described. Furthermore, factors associated with an unfavorable outcome (GOSE 1-4) are assessed using uni- and multivariate regression analyses. Finally, problems and future directions of the GNTR are discussed.
Conclusion: The pilot period of the GNTR offers a first glance at the current epidemiology and treatment characteristics of TBI patients in Germany. More importantly, they show how a national TBI registry yielding high-quality prospective data can be developed, implemented, and tested within four years
Background: Dexamethasone (Dex) is the most common corticosteroid to treat edema in glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Recent studies identified the addition of Dex to radiation therapy (RT) to be associated with poor survival. Independently, Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) provides a novel anti-cancer modality for patients with primary and recurrent GBM. Whether Dex influences the efficacy of TTFields, however, remains elusive.
Methods: Human GBM cell lines MZ54 and U251 were treated with RT or TTFields in combination with Dex and the effects on cell counts and cell death were determined via flow cytometry. We further performed a retrospective analysis of GBM patients with TTFields treatment +/- concomitant Dex and analysed its impact on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Results: The addition of Dex significantly reduced the efficacy of RT in U251 and MZ54 cells. TTFields (200 kHz/250 kHz) induced massive cell death in both cell lines. Concomitant treatment of TTFields and Dex did not reduce the overall efficacy of TTFields. Further, in our retrospective clinical analysis, we found that the addition of Dex to TTFields therapy did not influence PFS nor OS.
Conclusion: Our translational investigation indicates that the efficacy of TTFields therapy in patients with GBM and primary GBM cell lines is not affected by the addition of Dex.
Background: Epileptic seizures are common clinical features in patients with acute subdural hematoma (aSDH); however, diagnostic feasibility and therapeutic monitoring remain limited. Surface electroencephalography (EEG) is the major diagnostic tool for the detection of seizures but it might be not sensitive enough to detect all subclinical or nonconvulsive seizures or status epilepticus. Therefore, we have planned a clinical trial to evaluate a novel treatment modality by perioperatively implanting subdural EEG electrodes to diagnose seizures; we will then treat the seizures under therapeutic monitoring and analyze the clinical benefit.
Methods: In a prospective nonrandomized trial, we aim to include 110 patients with aSDH. Only patients undergoing surgical removal of aSDH will be included; one arm will be treated according to the guidelines of the Brain Trauma Foundation, while the other arm will additionally receive a subdural grid electrode. The study's primary outcome is the comparison of incidence of seizures and time-to-seizure between the interventional and control arms. Invasive therapeutic monitoring will guide treatment with antiseizure drugs (ASDs). The secondary outcome will be the functional outcome for both groups as assessed via the Glasgow Outcome Scale and modified Rankin Scale both at discharge and during 6 months of follow-up. The tertiary outcome will be the evaluation of chronic epilepsy within 2-4 years of follow-up.
Discussion: The implantation of a subdural EEG grid electrode in patients with aSDH is expected to be effective in diagnosing seizures in a timely manner, facilitating treatment with ASDs and monitoring of treatment success. Moreover, the occurrence of epileptiform discharges prior to the manifestation of seizure patterns could be evaluated in order to identify high-risk patients who might benefit from prophylactic treatment with ASDs.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier no. NCT04211233.
Background: Unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA) poses a therapeutic dilemma in which the risk-benefit analysis of invasive intervention has to be balanced against the natural history of the disease. To date, there is no medical treatment to prevent aneurysm development and subsequent progression to rupture. We explored the vitamin D system because of its known anti-inflammatory and anti-tissue-remodeling effect as a potential treatment for UIA.
Methods: 25-vitaminD3 levels tested between 2008-2016 and data of SAH patients admitted during the months with a peak versus nadir of VitD3-values were analyzed, retrospectively. We prospectively correlated VitD3 with size and number of aneurysms at the rupture time in patients admitted between 2017-2019. An experimental mice shear stress model and cell culture model were used to investigate the effect of 1,25-dihydroxy-vitaminD3 (1,25-VitD3) and acting mediators in this mechanism.
Results: Based on the retrospective analysis demonstrating an increased frequency of aneurysm rupture rate in patients during the low vitamin D period in winter, we started the prospective study evaluating plasma vitamin D levels at admission. VitD levels were inversely correlated with aneurysm size as well as number of aneurysms. Low number of aneurysms was significantly associated with sufficient plasma Vitamin D level as an independent factor in a multivariate analysis.
From bedside back to bench, active 1,25-VitD3 hormone attenuated the natural history of remodeling in mice basilar artery. Deletion of the vitamin-D-receptor in myeloid cells decreased the protective 1,25-VitD3 effect. Cell-culture of vascular fibroblasts confirmed the anti-tissue remodeling effect of 1,25-VitD3.
Conclusion: 1,25-VitD3 attenuates aneurysm development and subsequent progression to rupture. However, VitD-administration should be tested as optional treatment in management of patients with UIA.
Background: Dysphagia is a common and severe symptom of traumatic brain injury (TBI) affecting up to 78% of patients. It is associated with pneumonia, increased morbidity and mortality. Although subdural hematoma (SDH) accounts for over 50% of TBI, the occurrence of dysphagia in this subtype has not been investigated. This study investigates the overall frequency, clinical predictors of dysphagia and functional outcome of patients with SDH associated dysphagia.
Methods: All patients presenting in author ́s institution between 2007 and 2020 with SDH were included in the study. Patients with SDH and clinical suspicion for dysphagia received a clinical swallowing assessment by a speech and language pathologist (SLP). Furthermore the severity of dysphagia was rated according to swallowing disorder scale.Functional outcome was evaluated by Glasgow outcome scale (GOS).
Results: Of 545 patients with SDH, 71 patients had dysphagia (13%). The prevalence of dysphagia was significantly lower in the surgical arm compared to the conservative arm (11.8% vs 21.8%; OR 0.23; p=0.02). Independent predictors for dysphagia were GCS <13 at admission (p<0.001; OR 4.17), cardiovascular disease (p=0.002; OR 2.29) and pneumonia (p=0.002; OR 2.88) whereas operation was a protective factor (p<0.001; OR 0.2). All patients with dysphagia improved significantly under SLP treatment from initial diagnosis to hospital discharge (p<0.01). However, patients with most severe grade of dysphagia showed no significant improvement during the clinical course. Patients with dysphagia had significantly worse outcome (GOS 1-3) compared to those without dysphagia (48.8% vs 26.4%; p<0.001).
Conclusion: Dysphagia is a frequent symptom in SDH and the early identification of dysphagia is crucial regarding initiation of treatment and functional outcome. Surgery is effective in preventing dysphagia and should be considered in high-risked patients.