Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (28)
- Part of a Book (16)
- Review (10)
- Part of Periodical (2)
- Preprint (2)
Language
- German (32)
- Portuguese (22)
- English (2)
- Turkish (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (58)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (58) (remove)
Keywords
- Übersetzung (58) (remove)
Institute
- Extern (11)
Literaturwissenschaft und Translation : die Notwendigkeit translationswissenschaftlicher Theorien
(2010)
Translation activity has been the analyzing object of various disciplines, particularly Linguistics and Literature for centuries. The attempts of these disciplines to explain translation activity have always been inadequate. Holmes has drawn the attention to these problems by his paper which he has delivered at a congress in 1972 and emphasized the necessity of a new discipline. In the light of these developments, translation studies emerged in 70's and brought along many discussions. These discussions have revolved around the attempts of literature and lingusitics to explain translation activity. Starting question of our study is as follows; "Do the literary theories adequate enough to justify translation activities?" As an answer to our prompting question, this study aims to verify that literary theories are inadequate to explain and justify translation activity.
The argument that worldwide globalization will lead to a cultural homogenization is rarely acceptable for literary translation. German authors are still translated into Turkish, and the classics are retranslated. In view of Translation Studies, retranslations are very interesting because for being justified they are required to be superior to previous translation(s). This challenge is especially immense if it is the translation of an author like Heinrich von Kleist, whose narrative language is not only well-known but also exceptional. The aim of this study is to analyze the individual strategies of the Turkish translators and to demonstrate on examples whether they had been successful on their aim to satisfy Kleist’s specific literary style. The study is done on the example of the novella “Die Marquise von O...” (1808). For the analysis, the translations of Melâhat Togar (1952), Alev Yalnız (1992) and Ayalp Talun İnce (2004) are examined with regard to their distinctive strengths and weaknesses.
In Turkey currently there are about 20 Translation Studies departments with over 4000 students in six different languages. All these departments generally include a final project in their curriculum in the last two semesters, where the students have to prove their translation competence. In the literature and at the web sites of the Translation Studies departments in Turkey and abroad there is very little teaching material about these final projects while these projects are invaluable for the prospective translators. Therefore these projects have to be arranged as very functional, effective and representative of the translation reality. While the connection to the real translation market is assured, the students have to demonstrate their translation competence. Thus all Translation Studies departments have to consider these conditions and to organize this course under the real conditions of translation market and taking into consideration translation theory as well.
Translation is an intercultural and literary process. The intertextuality of each literary translation depends on the difference of the cultural context. It is important to respect a double difference, on the one hand the poetic and on the other hand the cultural variance. This is the result of many theories on current translations. George Steiner and Peter Utz are of the opinion that we can compare translations with interpretations of fiction because both are not completed and time-dependent. The process of interpretation of fiction as well as the translation are both parts of a hermeneutic process. The only difference is that the translation represents the meaning of the original of the fiction whereas the interpretation creates and documents a reading process.
Die poetische Evokation von Strömen und Flüssen, die als Verkehrswege verschiedene Länder und Sprachgemeinschaften untereinander verbinden, erinnert an die poetische Utopie grenzüberschreitend-universaler Kommunikation. Dem Bildfeld um Wasserläufe und Wasserwege affin ist das Bild der Quelle, die zudem für Ursprünglichkeit, Lebendigkeit, Erneuerung steht. Insofern enthält bereits der Titel des (im folgenden vorzustellenden) poetischen Projekts, mit dem Schuldt und Robert Kelly an Hölderlin anknüpfen, in nuce ein poetisch-utopisches Programm. Zudem fällt der Name eines Flusses, der einem Vielvölkerstaat seinen Namen gab: "Am Quell der Donau / Unquell the dawn now" […]. Mit dem zweiten Teil des Titels, der sich als klang-analoge, wenngleich semantisch inäquivalente Übersetzung des ersten versteht ("Unquell the dawn now"), kommt zugleich die nicht minder symbolträchtige Übergangszeit der Dämmerung ins Spiel – einer von vielen merkwürdigen sprachklanglich bedingten Zufällen, deren Erkundung sich dieses Projekt verschreibt. Schon der bilinguale Titel vollzieht eine Grenzüberschreitung – nicht nur zwischen der deutschen und der englischen Sprache, sondern auch zwischen 'Eigenem' und 'Fremdem'. Denn der erste (deutsche) Teil ist Zitat. Friedrich Hölderlin, der in seinem lyrischen Werk die Ströme Europas besungen und dabei eine komplexe symbolische Topographie entfaltet hat […], liefert die "Quelle", von der aus der bilinguale Sprach-Fluß seinen Ausgang nimmt.
Eines der grundlegenden Probleme, vor denen jeder literarische Übersetzer steht, ist die Übernahme des Stils eines Autors. Die erste Frage, die sich daher dem Übersetzer Sebalds stellt, ist die nach dem Wesen seines Stils, worin seine Magie besteht, damit jeder aufmerksame Leser im Stande sei, ihn sofort wiederzuerkennen und sich, ohne analytische Absicht, bis in die hintersten Winkel des Textes führen lässt - umso mehr ein Übersetzer, der beste Leser eines Autors, nach Friedrich Schlegel der ideale Leser.