Refine
Document Type
- Article (5)
- Part of a Book (1)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (7)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (7)
Keywords
- Rehabilitation (7) (remove)
Institute
Objective: To investigate the feasibility, reliability, and validity of the Modified forward hop (MFH) test in participants after ACL reconstruction (ACLR).
Design: Reliability study.
Setting: Assessments were administered at different clinical locations in Germany and Switzerland by the same 2 investigators.
Participants: Forty-eight active individuals participated in this study (N=48).
Main Outcome Measures: The participants performed MFHs and Forward hops for distance in a predetermined order. The feasibility of the MFH was quantified with proportions of successfully executed attempts and Pearson's χ2 test. Its reliability was estimated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM). Test validity was explored using Pearson's product moment correlation analyses.
Results: Fewer failed attempts were recorded among the participants (age: 30 [Standard deviation 11] years; 22 women, 26 (13) months post-surgery) when compared with the Forward hop for distance test (25/288 trials; 9% vs 72/288 trials; 25%). Within-session ICC values were excellent (>0.95) for both types of Forward hop tests, independent of the side examined. The SEM values were comparable between the Modified (injured: 5.6 cm, uninjured: 5.9 cm) and the classic Forward hop (injured: 4.3 cm, uninjured: 7.2 cm).
Conclusion: The MFH is a feasible, reliable, and valid tool for judging neuromuscular performance after ACLR. If the aim of a hop for distance incorporates enhanced perceived or real landing safety, landing on both feet should be used.
Nowadays, several options are available to treat patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss. Whenever surgical intervention is not possible or contra-indicated, and amplification by a conventional hearing device (e.g., behind-the-ear device) is not feasible, then implantable hearing devices are an indispensable next option. Implantable bone-conduction devices and middle-ear implants have advantages but also limitations concerning complexity/invasiveness of the surgery, medical complications, and effectiveness. To counsel the patient, the clinician should have a good overview of the options with regard to safety and reliability as well as unequivocal technical performance data. The present consensus document is the outcome of an extensive iterative process including ENT specialists, audiologists, health-policy scientists, and representatives/technicians of the main companies in this field. This document should provide a first framework for procedures and technical characterization to enhance effective communication between these stakeholders, improving health care.
Das Übergangstraining : Maßnahme in der betrieblichen Wiedereingliederung im professionellen Tanz
(2021)
Neben der Vorbeugung von akuten und chronischen Schäden ist im professionellen Bühnentanz bei gesundheitlichen Problemen am Muskel-Skelett-System eine intensive – dem Berufssport vergleichbare – Rehabilitation unter Berücksichtigung tanzspezifischer Bewegungselemente von großer Bedeutung. In Kombination mit anderen, die Leistungsfähigkeit wiederherstellenden Maßnahmen ist das in diesem Beitrag erläuterte sog. Übergangstraining („transition dance class“) als Trainingsform im Rahmen der stufenweisen beruflichen Wiedereingliederung von zentraler Bedeutung, da es die Übergangsphase zwischen allgemeinen Maßnahmen einer Rehabilitation und dem Wiedererreichen der vollständigen Arbeitsfähigkeit im Tanzberuf darstellt.
Rehabilitation I
(2019)
Background: Although anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear-prevention programs may be effective in the (secondary) prevention of a subsequent ACL injury, little is known, yet, on their effectiveness and feasibility. This study assesses the effects and implementation capacity of a secondary preventive motor-control training (the Stop-X program) after ACL reconstruction.
Methods and design: A multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled, prospective, superiority, two-arm design is adopted. Subsequent patients (18–35 years) with primary arthroscopic unilateral ACL reconstruction with autologous hamstring graft are enrolled. Postoperative guideline rehabilitation plus Classic follow-up treatment and guideline rehabilitation plus the Stop-X intervention will be compared. The onset of the Stop-X program as part of the postoperative follow-up treatment is individualized and function based. The participants must be released for the training components. The endpoint is the unrestricted return to sport (RTS) decision. Before (where applicable) reconstruction and after the clearance for the intervention (aimed at 4–8 months post surgery) until the unrestricted RTS decision (but at least until 12 months post surgery), all outcomes will be assessed once a month. Each participant is consequently measured at least five times to a maximum of 12 times. Twelve, 18 and 24 months after the surgery, follow-up-measurements and recurrence monitoring will follow. The primary outcome assessement (normalized knee-separation distance at the Drop Jump Screening Test (DJST)) is followed by the functional secondary outcomes assessements. The latter consist of quality assessments during simple (combined) balance side, balance front and single-leg hops for distance. All hop/jump tests are self-administered and filmed from the frontal view (3-m distance). All videos are transferred using safe big content transfer and subsequently (and blinded) expertly video-rated. Secondary outcomes are questionnaires on patient-reported knee function, kinesiophobia, RTS after ACL injury and training/therapy volume (frequency – intensity – type and time). All questionnaires are completed online using the participants’ pseudonym only.
Group allocation is executed randomly. The training intervention (Stop-X arm) consists of self-administered home-based exercises. The exercises are step-wise graduated and follow wound healing and functional restoration criteria. The training frequency for both arms is scheduled to be three times per week, each time for a 30 min duration. The program follows current (secondary) prevention guidelines.
Repeated measurements gain-score analyses using analyses of (co-)variance are performed for all outcomes.
Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register, identification number DRKS00015313. Registered on 1 October 2018.
Objectives of the study were to compare the effects of a single bout of preventive or regenerative foam rolling (FR) on exercise-induced neuromuscular exhaustion. Single-centre randomised-controlled study was designed. Forty-five healthy adults (22 female; 25±2 yrs) were allocated to three groups: 1) FR of the lower limb muscles prior to induction of fatigue, 2) FR after induction of fatigue, 3) no-treatment control. Neuromuscular exhaustion was provoked using a standardized and validated functional agility short-term fatigue protocol. Main outcome measure was the maximal isometric voluntary force of the knee extensors (MIVF). Secondary outcomes included pain and reactive strength (RSI). Preventive (-16%) and regenerative FR (-12%) resulted in a decreased loss in MIVF compared to control (-21%; p < 0.001) five minutes after exhaustion. Post-hoc tests indicated a large-magnitude, non-significant trend towards regenerative foam rolling to best restore strength (Cohen’s d > 0.8, p < 0.1). Differences over time (p < 0.001) between groups regarding pain and RSI did not turn out to be clinically meaningful. A single bout of foam rolling reduces neuromuscular exhaustion with reference to maximal force production. Regenerative rather than preventive foam rolling seems sufficient to prevent further fatigue.
Einleitung Welche Methoden der Leistungssteigerung gibt es eigentlich im Sport? Von körperlicher Aktivität und Training (mit einer Fülle positiver Wirkungen) über Ernährung und Nahrungsergänzungsmittel bis zu unerlaubten Mitteln. Welche Methoden wirken? Was ist sinnvoll? Was ist erlaubt? Was ist überflüssig? Wo kann der einzelne mit seinen eigenen Erwartungshaltungen dazu beitragen, zum Beispiel unrealistischen Leistungsdruck gegenüber Sporttreibenden und damit eine potentielle Dopingproblematik im Ursprung zu vermeiden? Diese Fragen wollte die Veranstaltung „Leistungssteigerung im Sport - Ursachen, Methoden, Bewertungen, Lösungen“ des Arbeitskreises Sportmedizin der Akademie für ärztliche Fortbildung und Weiterbildung der Landesärztekammer Hessen (Prof. Dr. med. Gerd Hoffmann, Prof. Dr. med. Ingeborg Siegfried) und des Hessischen Ärzteblattes (Prof. Dr. med. Toni Graf-Baumann) in Zusammenarbeit mit der Sektion Breiten-, Freizeit- und Alterssport der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Sportmedizin und Prävention (DGSP), der Verbände mit besonderer Aufgabenstellung, Verbände für Wissenschaft und Bildung und Förderverbände (VmbAWBF) im Deutschen Sportbund (DSB) und dem FIFA Medical Assessment and Research Center (F-MARC) in einer bevölkerungsoffenen Informationsveranstaltung am 09.05.2003 und einer Fort- und Weiterbildungsveranstaltung am 10.05.2003 beantworten. Bericht über die Beiträge - Eröffnung - Ursachen für Leistungssteigerung im Sport und Lösungsansätze (Dr. med. Udo Schreiber) - Training, Übertraining, Regeneration, Rehabilitation - Grundsätzliche Überlegungen unter spezieller Berücksichtigung des Bewegungssystems (Dr. med. Udo Schreiber) - Training, Übertraining, Regeneration, Rehabilitation - sportmedizinisch-internistische Aspekte: Wirkung körperlicher Aktivität auf verschiedene Organsysteme (Prof. Dr. med. Gerd Hoffmann) - Muskulatur und Muskelphysiologie (Dr. med. Udo Schreiber) - Auswirkungen körperlicher Aktivität auf das Immunsystem (Prof. Dr. med. Reinhard Bretzel) - Sport trotz Medikamenten und Medikamente wegen Sport (Prof. Dr. med. Bernd Waldecker) - Ernährung und Sport einschließlich sportartspezifischer und trainingsphasenspezifischer Aspekte (Prof. Dr. med. Gerd Hoffmann) - Flüssigkeitssubstitution im Sport (Diplom-Oecotrophologin Dr. Annette Hauenschild) - Nahrungsergänzungsmittel zur Leistungssteigerung im Sport (Dr. med. Kurt-Reiner Geiß) - Leistungssteigernde Mittel und Methoden im Sport; Grenzen zur verbotenen Leistungssteigerung im Sport - Doping im Sport (Prof. Dr. med. Eide-Dittmar Lübs) - Ethische und rechtliche Aspekte verbotener Leistungssteigerung (Prof. Dr. med. Toni Graf-Baumann) - Brauchen wir leistungssteigernde Verfahren? Lösungsansätze (Dr. med. Dierk Heimann)