Refine
Year of publication
- 2008 (4) (remove)
Document Type
- Working Paper (4) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (4) (remove)
Keywords
- Bewässerung (1)
- Europa (1)
- Geschichte 1900-2000 (1)
- Geschichte 1900-2003 (1)
- Klimaänderung (1)
- Landwirtschaft (1)
Institute
- Geowissenschaften (4) (remove)
Vorwort: Klima ist vor allem deswegen nicht nur von wissenschaftlichem, sondern auch von öffentlichem Interesse, weil es veränderlich ist und weil solche Änderungen gravierende ökologische sowie sozioökonomische Folgen haben können. Im Detail weisen Klimaänderungen allerdings komplizierte zeitliche und räumliche Strukturen auf, deren Erfassung und Interpretation alles andere als einfach ist. Bei den zeitlichen Strukturen stehen mit Recht vor allem relativ langfristige Trends sowie Extremereignisse im Blickpunkt, erstere, weil sie den systematischen Klimawandel zum Ausdruck bringen und letztere wegen ihrer besonders brisanten Auswirkungen. Mit beiden Aspekten hat sich unsere Arbeitsgruppe immer wieder eingehend befasst. Hinsichtlich der Extremereignisse bzw. Extremwertstatistik sei beispielsweise auf die Institutsberichte Nr. 1, 2 und 5 sowie die dort angegebene Literatur hingewiesen. Hier geht es wieder einmal um Klimatrends und dabei ganz besonders um die räumlichen Trendstrukturen. Der relativ langfristige und somit systematische Klimawandel läuft nämlich regional sehr unterschiedlich ab, was am besten in Trendkarten zum Ausdruck kommt. Solche regionalen, zum Teil sehr kleinräumigen Besonderheiten sind insbesondere beim Niederschlag sehr ausgeprägt. Zudem sind die räumlichen Trendstrukturen auch jahreszeitlich/monatlich sehr unterschiedlich. In unserer Arbeitsgruppe hat sich Herr Dr. Jörg Rapp im Rahmen seiner Diplom- und insbesondere Doktorarbeit intensiv mit diesem Problem beschäftigt, was zur Publikation des „Atlas der Niederschlags- und Temperaturtrends in Deutschland 1891-1990“ (Rapp und Schönwiese, 2. Aufl. 1996) sowie des „Climate Trend Atlas of Europe – Based on Observations 1891-1990“ (Schönwiese und Rapp, 1997) geführt hat. Die große Beachtung dieser Arbeiten ließ es schon lange als notwendig erscheinen, eine Aktualisierung vorzunehmen. Dies ist zunächst für den Klima-Trendatlas Deutschland geschehen, der nun für das Zeitintervall 1901-2000 vorliegt (Institutsbericht Nr. 4, 2005). Hier wird nun auch eine entsprechende Aktualisierung für Europa vorgelegt, und zwar auf der Grundlage der Berechnungen, die Reinhard Janoschitz in seiner Diplomarbeit durchgeführt hat. Dabei besteht eine enge Querverbindung zum Projekt VASClimO (Variability Analysis of Surface Climate Observations), das dankenswerterweise vom Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) im Rahmen von DEKLIM (Deutsches Klimaforschungsprogramm) gefördert worden ist (siehe Institutsbericht Nr. 6, in den vorab schon einige wenige Europa-Klima-Trendkarten einbezogen worden sind). Mit der Publikation des hier vorliegenden „Klima-Trendatlas Europa 1901-2000“ werden in insgesamt 261 Karten (davon 17 Karten in Farbdarstellung in den Text integriert) wieder umfangreiche Informationen zum Klimawandel in Europa vorgelegt. Sie beruhen vorwiegend auf linearen Trendanalysen hinsichtlich der bodennahen Lufttemperatur und des Niederschlags für die Zeit 1901-2000 sowie für die Subintervalle 1951-2000, 1961-1990 und 1971-2000, jeweils aufgrund der jährlichen, jahreszeitlichen und monatlichen Beobachtungsdaten. Die Signifikanz der Trends ist im (schwarz/weiß wiedergegebenen) Kartenteil durch Rasterung markiert. Da sich die Analyse eng an die oben zitierte Arbeit von Schönwiese und Rapp (1997) anlehnt, wo ausführliche textliche Erläuterungen zu finden sind (ebenso in Rapp, 2000) wurde hier der Textteil sehr knapp gehalten.
A data set of annual values of area equipped for irrigation for all 236 countries in the world during the time period 1900 - 2003 was generated. The basis for this data product was information available through various online data bases and from other published materials. The complete time series were then constructed around the reported data applying six statistical methods. The methods are discussed in terms of reliability and data uncertainties. The total area equipped for irrigation in the world in 1900 was 53.2 million hectares. Irrigation was mainly practiced in all the arid regions of the globe and in paddy rice areas of South and East Asia. In some temperate countries in Western Europe irrigation was practiced widely on pastures and meadows. The time series suggest a modest rate of increase of irrigated areas in the first half of the 20th century followed by a more dynamic development in the second half. The turn of the century is characterized by an overall consolidating trend resulting at a total of 285.8 million hectares in 2003. The major contributing countries have changed little throughout the century. This data product is regarded as a preliminary result toward an ongoing effort to develop a detailed data set and map of areas equipped for irrigation in the world over the 20th century using sub-national statistics and historical irrigation maps.
A new global crop water model was developed to compute blue (irrigation) water requirements and crop evapotranspiration from green (precipitation) water at a spatial resolution of 5 arc minutes by 5 arc minutes for 26 different crop classes. The model is based on soil water balances performed for each crop and each grid cell. For the first time a new global data set was applied consisting of monthly growing areas of irrigated crops and related cropping calendars. Crop water use was computed for irrigated land and the period 1998 – 2002. In this documentation report the data sets used as model input and methods used in the model calculations are described, followed by a presentation of the first results for blue and green water use at the global scale, for countries and specific crops. Additionally the simulated seasonal distribution of water use on irrigated land is presented. The computed model results are compared to census based statistical information on irrigation water use and to results of another crop water model developed at FAO.
A data set of monthly growing areas of 26 irrigated crops (MGAG-I) and related crop calendars (CC-I) was compiled for 402 spatial entities. The selection of the crops consisted of all major food crops including regionally important ones (wheat, rice, maize, barley, rye, millet, sorghum, soybeans, sunflower, potatoes, cassava, sugar cane, sugar beets, oil palm, rapeseed/canola, groundnuts/peanuts, pulses, citrus, date palm, grapes/vine, cocoa, coffee), major water-consuming crops (cotton), and unspecified other crops (other perennial crops, other annual crops, managed grassland). The data set refers to the time period 1998-2002 and has a spatial resolution of 5 arc minutes by 5 arc minutes which is 8 km by 8 km at the equator. This is the first time that a data set of cell-specific irrigated growing areas of irrigated crops with this spatial resolution was created. The data set is consistent to the irrigated area and water use statistics of the AQUASTAT programme of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (http://www.fao.org/ag/agl/aglw/aquastat/main/index.stm) and the Global Map of Irrigation Areas (GMIA) (http://www.fao.org/ag/agl/aglw/aquastat/irrigationmap/index.stm). At the cell-level it was tried to maximise consistency to the cropland extent and cropland harvested area from the Department of Geography and Earth System Science Program of the McGill University at Montreal, Quebec, Canada and the Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE) of the University of Wisconsin at Madison, USA (http://www.geog.mcgill.ca/~nramankutty/ Datasets/Datasets.html and http://geomatics.geog.mcgill.ca/~navin/pub/Data/175crops2000/). The consistency between the grid product and the input data was quantified. MGAG-I and CC-I are fully consistent to each other on entity level. For input data other than CC-I, the consistency of MGAG-I on cell level was calculated. The consistency of MGAG-I with respect to the area equipped for irrigation (AEI) of GMIA and to the cropland extent of SAGE was characterised by the sum of the cell-specific maximum difference between the MGAG-I monthly total irrigated area and the reference area when the latter was exceeded in the grid cell. The consistency of the harvested area contained in MGAG-I with respect to SAGE harvested area was characterised by the crop-specific sum of the cell-specific difference between MGAG-I harvested area and the SAGE harvested area when the latter was exceeded in the grid cell. In all three cases, the sums are the excess areas that should not have been distributed under the assumption that the input data were correct. Globally, this cell-level excess of MGAG-I as compared to AEI is 331,304 ha or only about 0.12 % of the global AEI of 278.9 Mha found in the original grid. The respective cell-level excess of MGAG-I as compared to the SAGE cropland extent is 32.2 Mha, corresponding to about 2.2 % of the total cropland area. The respective cell-level excess of MGAG-I as compared to the SAGE harvested area is 27 % of the irrigated harvested area, or 11.5 % of the AEI. In a further step that will be published later also rainfed areas were compiled in order to form the Global data set of monthly irrigated and rainfed crop areas around the year 2000 (MIRCA2000). The data set can be used for global and continental-scale studies on food security and water use. In the future, it will be improved, e.g. with a better spatial resolution of crop calendars and an improved crop distribution algorithm. The MIRCA2000 data set, its full documentation together with future updates will be freely available through the following long-term internet site: http://www.geo.uni-frankfurt.de/ipg/ag/dl/forschung/MIRCA/index.html. The research presented here was funded by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG) within the framework of the research project entitled "Consistent assessment of global green, blue and virtual water fluxes in the context of food production: regional stresses and worldwide teleconnections". The authors thank Navin Ramankutty and Chad Monfreda for making available the current SAGE datasets on cropland extent (Ramankutty et al., 2008) and harvested area (Monfreda et al., 2008) prior to their publication.