Refine
Year of publication
- 2014 (19) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of Periodical (8)
- Article (5)
- Book (2)
- Part of a Book (1)
- Master's Thesis (1)
- Report (1)
- Review (1)
Language
- French (19) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (19) (remove)
Keywords
- Frankfurt School (2)
- Psychoanalysis (2)
- 500-1900 (1)
- Adorno (1)
- Barrès, Maurice (1)
- Berlin <Motiv> (1)
- Capitalism (1)
- Claudel, Paul (1)
- Critical Theory (1)
- Critical Theory, (1)
Institute
- Philosophie (3)
- Geschichtswissenschaften (2)
How does one think about the form of the State in its management of conflicting ethnic groups in positive light in Africa in the present and in the future? Ethnic reality in Africa continues to be the principal determining factor of individual and collective existence, constituting an obstacle to the normal operation of its States, which often fail or collapse. In the global era, the re-organisation of power and of thought in plural societies leads to socio-political and geopolitical stabilisation. The author here argues for the implementation of 'deliberative democracy' or 'governance under the tree' as a synthesis of liberal and republican democracy based on the 'win-win' principle, different from majoritarian democracy where the 'winner takes all'. The theory of the multinational state thus proposes a constitutional, political and conceptual innovation in the plural societies of the 21st century: it entails restructuring the imagination to allow a global shift in African political thought, its needs, desires, quests, expectations and hopes.
From my friendships and loves are born the lines herein. My greatest desire is that we must learn to love to the best of our abilities and not better than the Best of our abilities. Requesting the latter would be demanding the impossible. For me, every heart is filled with goodness and love that only a positive posturing and channeling of their energies can warrant the transcendence of these terrestrial realities to flirt with their divine counterparts.
The Frankfurt School has often been associated to the project of “marrying” Freud’s psychoanalysis with a Marxian critique of capitalist societies. This article offers however another version of the link between Critical Theory and psychoanalysis. After having briefly sketched the notion of a “critical theory of society”, the Author shows how a critique of modern capitalist societies and Freudian psychoanalysis actually meet at a “methodological” level for which the marriage between Hegel and Freud seems to be the relevant one. As a conclusion, the Author contrasts two kinds of social critique that can be found in the Frankfurt School, which are deeply linked with the first and the latest generation of the Frankfurt School considered in their relation to
psychoanalysis.
The paper discusses the problem of the possible relation between psychoanalytic concepts and social critique in the perspective of Adorno's social thought. The title refers to Adorno's idea that psyche as individual spontaneity has now lost the weight it used to have in the liberal era. As a brief introductory remark, I clarify the status of theory for Adorno, i.e., the circularity between interpretation and description as grounded by the nature of the social object itself. Then I analyse his core idea of “social objectivity” as an impersonal mechanism which is at the same time produced by men and reified, heteronomous for them, and I argue that, for Adorno, the discontinuity existing between individual and society prevents an immediate shift of psychoanalytic concepts to the social world: the example of fascism clearly proves that the determining social forces today, while instrumentally exploiting deep psychical materials, are not themselves psychological. In the final part, I show how, for Adorno, psychology and sociology nevertheless need to be mediated with each other, while avoiding the superficial synthesis the so-called “revised psychoanalysis” aims to, and I point out some similarities between psychoanalytic practice and social critique as conceived by him.
Heinrich Kalteisen
(2014)
Avec le présent fascicule, le Mittelalterzentrum (Centre d’études médiévales) de la Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften (BBAW) inaugure une nouvelle série: une fois par an, le centre organisera une conférence publique qui sera ensuite publiée sous ce format. Dans la préface, Michael Borgolte, porte-parole du Mittelalterzentrum, indique que le centre a choisi ce format afin de mettre en relief la contribution des disciplines médiévistes au travail de la BBAW, mais aussi afin de promouvoir la réflexion des disciplines concernées sur leur propre position et d’animer le dialogue et les contacts interdisciplinaires. Bref, il s’agit de montrer, entre autres, l’actualité des recherches médiévistes – et le choix du premier conférencier n’aurait pu être meilleur: Otto Gerhard Oexle, ancien directeur du Max-Planck-Institut für Geschichte à Göttingen, réfléchit et écrit depuis longtemps sur le travail des historiens et ses implications théoriques, mais aussi sur le rôle social de l’histoire en général dans les sociétés contemporaines. Il met tout particulièrement l’accent sur le rôle constitutif que jouent le Moyen Âge et les images que nous nous en faisons pour la mise en place de la »modernité«.