Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (30935)
- Part of Periodical (11934)
- Book (8324)
- Doctoral Thesis (5744)
- Part of a Book (3727)
- Working Paper (3394)
- Review (2879)
- Contribution to a Periodical (2369)
- Preprint (2335)
- Conference Proceeding (1710)
Language
- German (42643)
- English (30315)
- French (1067)
- Portuguese (723)
- Multiple languages (314)
- Croatian (302)
- Spanish (301)
- Italian (195)
- mis (174)
- Turkish (148)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (76507) (remove)
Keywords
- Deutsch (1038)
- Literatur (809)
- taxonomy (771)
- Deutschland (543)
- Rezension (491)
- new species (457)
- Frankfurt <Main> / Universität (341)
- Rezeption (325)
- Geschichte (292)
- Übersetzung (271)
Institute
- Medizin (7823)
- Präsidium (5239)
- Physik (4780)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (2719)
- Extern (2661)
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (2379)
- Biowissenschaften (2208)
- Biochemie und Chemie (1981)
- Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS) (1887)
- Informatik (1728)
Communist regimes in general and especially the one in Albania destroyed almost every aspect of political, social, cultural and economic life, including the notion of pluralism and intellectual elite of the country. In Albania, the transition into democracy in 90’ was done through extrication which means that the authoritarian government was weakened, but not as thoroughly as in a transition by defeat. As a consequence, the former Communist elite was able to negotiate crucial features of the transition and was very quickly transformed into the new pluralist political class. This position enabled the communist elite to be rehabilitated and together with the new emerged communist elite to remain a strong influential actor in new emerged democracy and de facto to run in continuance the country. The purpose of the new emerged communist elite to maintain control was favored inter alia by the absence of a new strong intellectual elite and was done merely by sharing the power among its members divided into different political parties and also by using the ‘pluralist’ law as a tool for social control over new emerging intellectual elites. The use of law as a tool for social control by the political class has severely damaged people's understanding and expectations on the law, its relations with the state as well as international community. Indeed, such experience of the use of law by the political class for its own narrow interests, has made people lose confidence in law and state as well as has severely weakened the law enforcement in the country. To conclude, the overall purpose of this paper would be the analysis of law in general and its understandings and development in a post-communist society such as Albania from different points of view.
On the backdrop of the 2008 financial crisis this paper introduces an understanding of societal crises as a reduction in the meaning production of social entities, which can either be internally or externally provoked. The emergence of constitutions and, more generally, constitutional structures, can be understood as responses to both forms of crisis. This is the case because they are double-edged structures which are simultaneously oriented towards the maintenance of internal order and stability within a given social entity at the same time as they frame the transfer of the meaning components between the social entities and their environments. Thus, the 2008 financial crisis indicates a failure of constitutional bonding. When observed from an overall structural perspective, the reasons for this failure can be traced back to an increased discrepancy between the structural composition of world society and the constitutional structures in place. The crisis reflects a failure to respond to two simultaneous, inter-related and mutually re-inforcing structural transformations. First, there is the increased globalisation, which has led to massive dis-locations in the relative centrality of the different national configurations for the reproductive processes of functional systems. Second, there is a structural transformation of the transnational layer of world society through a reduced reliance on the centre/periphery differentiation and an increased reliance on functional differentiation. One of the many consequences of this development is the emergence of new forms of transnational law and politics. A new constitutional architecture which reflects these transformations is needed in order to ensure an adequate constitutional bonding of economic processes, as well as of other social processes.
On the backdrop of the 2008 financial crisis this paper introduces an understanding of societal crises as a reduction in the meaning production of social entities, which can either be internally or externally provoked. The emergence of constitutions and, more generally, constitutional structures, can be understood as responses to both forms of crisis. This is the case because they are double-edged structures which are simultaneously oriented towards the maintenance of internal order and stability within a given social entity at the same time as they frame the transfer of the meaning components between the social entities and their environments. Thus, the 2008 financial crisis indicates a failure of constitutional bonding. When observed from an overall structural perspective, the reasons for this failure can be traced back to an increased discrepancy between the structural composition of world society and the constitutional structures in place. The crisis reflects a failure to respond to two simultaneous, inter-related and mutually re-inforcing structural transformations. First, there is the increased globalisation, which has led to massive dis-locations in the relative centrality of the different national configurations for the reproductive processes of functional systems. Second, there is a structural transformation of the transnational layer of world society through a reduced reliance on the centre/periphery differentiation and an increased reliance on functional differentiation. One of the many consequences of this development is the emergence of new forms of transnational law and politics. A new constitutional architecture which reflects these transformations is needed in order to ensure an adequate constitutional bonding of economic processes, as well as of other social processes.
This paper aims to present the similarities and differences between Posner's defense of Law and Economics (LAE) and Holmes' pragmatism. The investigation is centered in the arguments of economic consequences of judicial decisions. Law and Economics tend to emphasize these arguments as a determinant characterization of legal pragmatism. These arguments involve some dilemmas: Is it possible to eliminate a rule, or reinterpret it according to the effect of its application in practical life? May these economic consequences serve as argument for a replacement of traditional interpretation? To what extent can we rule out the law with arguments of consequence? Despite the influence, LAE has some important differences with respect Holmes' legal pragmatism. Posner's LAE involves the economic principle of wealth maximization and its relations with utilitarianism and economic liberalism. Consequentialism in Holmes, by contrast, is based on a teleological interpretation of existing rules. It is important that the judge does not decide based on a specific economic theory. Also, legal pragmatism does not advocate abandoning the tenets of positivism that form the basis for the rule of law. Holmes defends a judicial restraint. Accordingly, the argument of consequence must have previous limits in precedents and statutes. However, both legal pragmatism and LAE are connected by the idea that the adaptation of the law to a reasonable end can not be absent from the canons of interpretation and adjudication.
The European Monetary Union euro has done very well since its initiation. Price stability has been secured and the external value of the new currency is more than satisfactory. The confidence in it is also shown by its increasing use as a global reserve currency. It has been a stabilizing factor in the current crisis. The recent budgetary problems of some member states are principally not a problem of the Monetary Union. It is therefore in no way justified to speak of a "Euro-crisis". It is true, however, that the Monetary Union restricts the number of possibilities for member states to solve their financial problems but it does not eliminate them entirely that outside help would have become indispensible. The purchase of debt instruments of member states in financial distress by the ECB is questionable from an economic, and more important, from a legal point of view. The longer the duration, the less legally justifiable is it. Financial support for member states in severe financial distress might be acceptable as a temporary crisis resolution mechanism. A permanent support mechanism needs a basis in the primary law of the EU. The treatment of the risk of "sovereign" debt in the legal framework for financial institutions urgently needs improvement. Especially the capital requirements for credit institutions have to be adjusted.
Examined here are the legal and practical reasons for the inefficiency of the legal framework of creditor protection in Nigeria. This is amply justified considering the critical role of credit in the promotion of economic growth and development and also bearing in mind the near calamitous consequences the 2009 financial crisis unleashed not only among Nigerian banks and financial institutions, and in the international financial system. The latter nearly led to socioeconomic catastrophe in Nigeria, as well as globally. It is hoped that book is found useful by government, policy makers, academics, corporate financial experts, investment bankers and other stakeholders to initiate and implement efficient policy actions to protect creditors in order to sustain the flow of credit, the engine of any economy.
"Law after Auschwitz", das jüngste Buch des kanadischen Rechtswissenschaftlers David Fraser, ist keine streng durchgeführte Abhandlung mit nur einer strukturbildenden Fragestellung, sondern eine Sammlung von historischen, philosophischen und soziologischen Betrachtungen über den Holocaust, das Recht, die Justiz und die Juristen in verschiedenen Ländern. Anders als der Titel vermuten lässt, geht es Fraser keineswegs darum, die Erfahrung der Massenvernichtung als einzigartigen Zivilisationsbruch und nachhaltigste Zäsur in der Menschheitsgeschichte darzustellen. Das Buch reiht sich nicht in die inzwischen lange Serie von Studien ein, die aus einem "Davor" und "Danach"-Blickwinkel Auschwitz auf seine Folgen hin untersuchen, wie es bekanntlich für ›das Denken‹ im Allgemeinen, die Theologie, die Möglichkeit, Gedichte zu schreiben u.s.w. bereits geschehen ist. Fraser setzt der Grundrichtung dieser Literaturgattung eine drastische Kontinuitätsbehauptung entgegen: Auch bei den Normen, die den Massenmord regelten, handelte es sich um Recht und damit um ein Instrument, das heute nach wie vor ähnlich verwendet wird. Kritisiert werden Deutungsmuster, die das Recht unter der NS-Herrschaft als Nicht-Recht, Rechtsperversion oder Legalitätsfassade etikettieren und damit aus dem Rechtsgeschichtsverlauf ausklammern wollen. Auch Verbrechen können und konnten (im formellen Sinn) legal sein: Nazi law was law. Diese These ist eine Art Gravitationszentrum, das die weit in verschiedene Bereiche ausgreifende Darstellung (sie enthält Auseinandersetzungen mit der Philosophie Agambens sowie mit verschiedenen juristischen Behandlungen von NS-Verbrechen in Frankreich, den USA, Großbritannien, Kanada und Australien) vor dem Zerfall in völlig unzusammenhängende Einzelteile bewahrt. So gerät das Buch zu einem Thema mit Variationen; kaum ein Kapitel, in dem Fraser nicht dem heutigen Juristen vor Augen führt, dass sein Stoff und seine Methoden sich in vielen Aspekten nicht wesentlich von denen seiner deutschen Kollegen aus der Zeit von 1933 bis 1945 unterscheiden. ...
Recent clinical data support the clinical use of oral lavender oil in patients suffering from subsyndromal anxiety. We identified the molecular mechanism of action that will alter the perception of lavender oil as a nonspecific ingredient of aromatherapy to a potent anxiolytic inhibiting voltage dependent calcium channels (VOCCs) as highly selective drug target. In contrast to previous publications where exorbitant high concentrations were used, the effects of lavender oil in behavioral, biochemical, and electrophysiological experiments were investigated in physiological concentrations in the nanomolar range, which correlate to a single dosage of 80 mg/d in humans that was used in clinical trials. We show for the first time that lavender oil bears some similarities with the established anxiolytic pregabalin. Lavender oil inhibits VOCCs in synaptosomes, primary hippocampal neurons and stably overexpressing cell lines in the same range such as pregabalin. Interestingly, Silexan does not primarily bind to P/Q type calcium channels such as pregabalin and does not interact with the binding site of pregabalin, the α2δ subunit of VOCCs. Lavender oil reduces non-selectively the calcium influx through several different types of VOCCs such as the N-type, P/Q-type and T-type VOCCs. In the hippocampus, one brain region important for anxiety disorders, we show that inhibition by lavender oil is mainly mediated via N-type and P/Q-type VOCCs. Taken together, we provide a pharmacological and molecular rationale for the clinical use of the oral application of lavender oil in patients suffering from anxiety.
Lava Lamp Poems
(2010)