Universitätspublikationen
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (26) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (26)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (26) (remove)
Keywords
- COVID-19 (4)
- Cochlear implant (3)
- Cochlear implantation (3)
- Anschlussheilbehandlung (2)
- Auditory rehabilitation (2)
- Cochleaimplantation (2)
- Follow-up treatment (2)
- Hörrehabilitation (2)
- Rehabilitation outcome (2)
- Rehabilitationsergebnis (2)
Institute
- Medizin (26)
Hintergrund: Mit der im Jahr 2020 aktualisierten AWMF-Leitlinie zur Versorgung mit einem Cochleaimplantat (CI) wurde erstmals der gesamte Prozess einer CI-Versorgung definiert. In der vorliegenden Studie wurden die Machbarkeit und die Ergebnisse einer sehr frühen Rehabilitationsmaßnahme (Reha) untersucht.
Methodik: Es wurden 54 Patienten in die Interventionsgruppe (IG) eingeschlossen, bei der die Reha innerhalb von 14 (maximal 28) Tagen nach der Implantation eingeleitet wurde. In eine Kontrollgruppe (KG, n = 21) wurden Patienten mit deutlich längerer Wartezeit eingeschlossen. Neben dem Beginn und der Dauer der Reha wurde das mit CI erreichte Sprachverstehen zu verschiedenen Zeitpunkten innerhalb von 12 Monaten erfasst. Zusätzlich wurde mit Fragebögen der Aufwand der Anpassung des CI-Prozessors und die Zufriedenheit der Patienten mit dem Ergebnis sowie dem Zeitpunkt des Beginns der Reha ermittelt.
Ergebnisse: Die Wartezeit zwischen Implantation und Beginn der Reha lag in der IG bei 14 Tagen und in der KG bei 106 Tagen (Mediane). Es konnten 92,6 % der Patienten der IG die Reha innerhalb von 14 Tagen antreten. Der Effekt der Reha lag in der IG bei 35 und in der KG bei 25 Prozentpunkten (Freiburger Einsilbertest). Nach 6 und 12 Monaten (M) CI-Nutzung zeigten beide Gruppen sowohl in der Testbedingung in Ruhe (IG/KG 6M: 70 %/70 %; 12M: 70 %/60 %, Freiburger Einsilbertest) als auch im Störgeräusch (IG/KG 6M: −1,1 dB SNR/–0,85 dB SNR; 12M: −0,65 dB SNR/+0,3 dB SNR, Oldenburger Satztest) vergleichbare Ergebnisse. Die mittels des Fragebogens Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) erfassten Ergebnisse für die Einschätzung der Hörqualität zeigten nach 6 Monaten eine bessere Bewertung in der IG, die sich nach 12 Monaten an die Ergebnisse der KG anglich. Die IG war mit dem Zeitpunkt des Beginns der Reha deutlich zufriedener als die KG. Alle anderen aus Fragebögen ermittelten Daten zeigten keine Unterschiede zwischen den beiden Gruppen.
Schlussfolgerung: Der sehr frühe Beginn einer stationären Reha nach Cochleaimplantation ist erfolgreich umsetzbar. Die Reha konnte innerhalb von 7 Wochen nach der Implantation abgeschlossen werden. Der Vergleich der Ergebnisse der Tests des Sprachverstehens vor und nach der Reha zeigte eine deutliche Steigerung. Somit ist ein deutlicher Reha-Effekt nachweisbar. Die Aufnahme der CI-Rehabilitation in den Katalog der Anschlussheilbehandlungen ist somit wissenschaftlich begründet und damit dringend zu empfehlen.
Background: The Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) clinical practice guideline on cochlear implant (CI) treatment, which was updated in 2020, defined the entire process of CI care for the first time. In the present study, the feasibility and results of very early rehabilitation were examined.
Materials and methods: The intervention group (IG) comprised 54 patients in whom rehabilitation was initiated within 14 (maximally 28) days after implantation. Patients with a significantly longer waiting time were included in the control group (CG, n = 21). In addition to the start and duration of rehabilitation, the speech intelligibility achieved with CI was recorded at different timepoints within a 12-month period. In addition, questionnaires were used to assess the effort of fitting the CI processor and the patients’ satisfaction with the outcome as well as the timing of the start of rehabilitation.
Results: Median waiting time between implantation and start of rehabilitation was 14 days in the IG and 106 days in the CG; 92.6% of IG patients were able to start rehabilitation within 14 days. The effect of rehabilitation in the IG was 35 and in the CG 25 percentage points (Freiburg monosyllabic test). After 6 and 12 months of CI use, both groups showed comparable results in the test condition in quiet (IG/CG 6 months: 70%/70%; 12 months: 70%/60%, Freiburg monosyllabic test) and in noise (IG/CG 6 months: −1.1 dB SNR/–0.85 dB SNR; 12 months: −0.65 dB SNR/+0.3 dB SNR, Oldenburg sentence test). Hearing quality assessment scores collected by SSQ (Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale) questionnaire showed better scores in the IG at 6 months, which converged to CG scores at 12 months. The IG was significantly more satisfied with the timing of the start of rehab than the CG. All other data obtained from questionnaires showed no differences between the two groups.
Conclusion: A very early start of inpatient rehabilitation after cochlear implantation was successfully implemented. The rehabilitation was completed within 7 weeks of CI surgery. Comparison of speech recognition test results before and after rehabilitation showed a significant improvement. A clear rehabilitation effect can therefore be demonstrated. Inclusion of CI rehabilitation in the German catalog of follow-up treatments is thus scientifically justified and therefore strongly recommended.
Hearing loss in old age, which often goes untreated, has far-reaching consequences. Furthermore, reduction of cognitive abilities and dementia can also occur, which also affects quality of life. The aim of this study was to investigate the hearing performance of seniors without hearing complaints with respect to speech perception in noise and the ability to localize sounds. Results were tested for correlations with age and cognitive performance. The study included 40 subjects aged between 60 and 90 years (mean age: 69.3 years) with not self-reported hearing problems. The subjects were screened for dementia. Audiological tests included pure-tone audiometry and speech perception in two types of background noise (continuous and amplitude-modulated noise) which was either co-located or spatially separated (multi-source noise field, MSNF) from the target speech. Sound localization ability was assessed and hearing performance was self-evaluated by a questionnaire. Speech in noise and sound localization was compared with young normal hearing adults. Although considering themselves as hearing normal, 17 subjects had at least a mild hearing loss. There was a significant negative correlation between hearing loss and dementia screening (DemTect) score. Speech perception in noise decreased significantly with age. There were significant negative correlations between speech perception in noise and DemTect score for both spatial configurations. Mean SRTs obtained in the co-located noise condition with amplitude-modulated noise were on average 3.1 dB better than with continuous noise. This gap-listening effect was severely diminished compared to a younger normal hearing subject group. In continuous noise, spatial separation of speech and noise led to better SRTs compared to the co-located masker condition. SRTs in MSNF deteriorated in modulated noise compared to continuous noise by 2.6 dB. Highest impact of age was found for speech perception scores using noise stimuli with temporal modulation in binaural test conditions. Mean localization error was in the range of young adults. Mean amount of front/back confusions was 11.5% higher than for young adults. Speech perception tests in the presence of temporally modulated noise can serve as a screening method for early detection of hearing disorders in older adults. This allows for early prescription of hearing aids.
Purpose: Monocentric, prospective study to investigate whether concomitant support of cochlear implant (CI) patients by CI-trained otolaryngologists and application of a standardized head bandage can minimize potential complications during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Methods: Thirty-seven patients with 46 CIs underwent MRI with a prophylactic head bandage. All participants and the otolaryngologist at the CI center completed pre- and post-MRI questionnaires documenting body region scanned, duration of MRI and bandage wear, field strength during the scan, and any complications. If pain was experienced, it was assessed using a visual analog scale (1–10).
Results: MRI was performed without adverse events in 37.8% of cases. Magnet dislocation requiring surgical revision occurred in 2% of cases. Pain was reported in 86% of cases, often due to the tightness of the dressing. Patients with rotating, MRI-compatible magnets reported significantly less pain than participants with older-generation implants. In 11% of cases, the MRI was discontinued.
Conclusion: Serious complications during MRI in cochlear implant patients are rare. Pain is the most common adverse event, probably mainly due to the tight bandage required by most implant types. With newer generations of magnets, these patients experience less pain, no dislocation of the magnets, and no need for bandaging. Although magnet dislocation cannot be completely prevented in older generations of implants, it appears to be reduced by good patient management, which recommends examination under the guidance of physicians trained in the use of hearing implants.
Bilateral simultaneous cochlear implantation is a safe method of hearing rehabilitation in adults
(2023)
Purpose: Bilateral cochlear implantation is an effective treatment for patients with bilateral profound hearing loss. In contrast to children, adults mostly choose a sequential surgery. This study addresses whether simultaneous bilateral CI is associated with higher rates of complications compared to sequential implantation.
Methods: 169 bilateral CI surgeries were analyzed retrospectively. 34 of the patients were implanted simultaneously (group 1), whereas 135 patients were implanted sequentially (group 2). The duration of surgery, the incidence of minor and major complications and the duration of hospitalization of both groups were compared.
Results: In group 1, the total operating room time was significantly shorter. The incidences of minor and major surgical complications showed no statistically significant differences. A fatal non-surgical complication in group 1 was particularly extensively reappraised without evidence of a causal relationship to the chosen mode of care. The duration of hospitalization was 0.7 days longer than in unilateral implantation but 2.8 days shorter than the combined two hospital stays in group 2.
Conclusion: In the synopsis of all considered complications and complication-relevant factors, equivalence of simultaneous and sequential cochlear implantation in adults in terms of safety was found. However, potential side effects related to longer surgical time in simultaneous surgery must be considered individually. Careful patient selection with special consideration to existing comorbidities and preoperative anesthesiologic evaluation is essential.
Purpose: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replicates predominantly in the upper respiratory tract and is primarily transmitted by droplets and aerosols. Taking the medical history for typical COVID-19 symptoms and PCR-based SARS-CoV-2 testing have become established as screening procedures. The aim of this work was to describe the clinical appearance of SARS-CoV-2-PCR positive patients and to determine the SARS-CoV-2 contact risk for health care workers (HCW).
Methods: The retrospective study included n = 2283 SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests from n = 1725 patients with otorhinolaryngological (ORL) diseases performed from March to November 2020 prior to inpatient treatment. In addition, demographic data and medical history were assessed.
Results: n = 13 PCR tests (0.6%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. The positive rate showed a significant increase during the observation period (p < 0.01). None of the patients had clinical symptoms that led to a suspected diagnosis of COVID-19 before PCR testing. The patients were either asymptomatic (n = 4) or had symptoms that were interpreted as symptoms typical of the ORL disease or secondary diagnoses (n = 9).
Conclusion: The identification of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients is a considerable challenge in clinical practice. Our findings illustrate that taking a medical history alone is of limited value and cannot replace molecular SARS-CoV-2 testing, especially for patients with ORL diseases. Our data also demonstrate that there is a high probability of contact with SARS-CoV-2-positive patients in everyday clinical practice, so that the use of personal protective equipment, even in apparently “routine cases”, is highly recommended.
Long-term effects on the quality of life following cochlear implant treatment in older patients
(2022)
Purpose: Even in older patients, hearing rehabilitation with a cochlear implant has become an established method for deafened or severely hearing-impaired patients. In addition to the hearing improvement, numerous other effects of CI treatment can be observed in clinical routine. In the literature, there is multiple evidence for a rapid and significant improvement in quality of life with CI treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of hearing rehabilitation using CI on the quality of life in older patients (≥ 65 years).
Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study examined 84 patients between the age of 65 and 101 years who received unilateral CI treatment for the first time between one and 10 years ago. The World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale-Old (WHOQL-OLD) was used to determine the quality of life. The study cohort was divided into three groups to compare the quality of life over time: group I (1–3 years after CI treatment), group II (4–6 years after CI treatment), and group III (7–10 years after CI treatment). In addition, the data from this study were compared with the results of our previous study (Issing et al. 2020) in which we focused on the first 6 months after CI treatment.
Results: In all three groups, there was a significant improvement in monosyllabic discrimination within 1 year after CI fitting (p > 0.001). No significant differences were found between the three groups. There were no significant differences between the three groups in the WHOQOL-OLD total score (p = 0.487) or any of the other six facets. Moreover, no significant differences were found compared to the study group of our previous study 6 months after CI treatment.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates the long-term stability of the improved quality of life following unilateral CI treatment in patients aged 65 years or older.
The aim of the study was to obtain volumetric data of the components of the inner ear using three-dimensional reconstruction of high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Two hundred three CBCT image series of the temporal bone from 118 anatomically normal patients (55 women and 63 men; mean age: 49.4 ± 20.4 years) with different suspected disorders were included in this study. Normative volumetric measurements of the inner ear, the cochlea, the semicircular canals (SSC), and the vestibule were determined using a semi-automated reconstruction method of the Workstation. Volumetric measurements were successfully completed in all 118 patients. Mean inner ear, cochlear, and vestibule volumes were statistically significantly larger in males than in females on both sides (p < 0.001). Regarding the semicircular canals, no statistically significant (p = 0.053) volume difference was found. The difference between the volumes on both sides was not significant. No correlation between the patient’s age and the volume of the compartments was seen (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference between mean bony inner ear volumes when the clinical diagnoses were compared (p > 0.05 for all clinical diagnoses and volumes). Our study concluded that three-dimensional reconstruction and assessment of the volumetric measurements of the inner ear can be obtained using high-resolution CBCT imaging.
Purpose: The treatment with a cochlear implant (CI) is the gold standard in therapy of patients with profound hearing loss or deafness. Successful hearing rehabilitation with a CI is a complex, multi-stage process. In medicine, “Clinical Practice Guidelines” (CPG) are widely accepted for the standardization of such processes. These are supplemented by medical registries in which data regarding the treatment can be collected and evaluated. The aim of this paper is to identify currently existing CI-related CPGs and registries in Europe.
Methods: Between 01/2021 and 06/2021, 42 countries on the European continent, including the United Kingdom, Russia and Turkey, were screened using an internet search (search engine: Google) and a key word search in the Pubmed database. Search terms were the respective country name combined with the following terms: “Cochlear Implant”, “CI”, “Cochlear implant clinical practice guideline”, “CI Guideline”, “Cochlear Implant Registry”, “CI Registry”, “Ear nose throat society”. The internet search was conducted in English as well as in the corresponding national language. The objective was to identify a CI-related CPG or registry.
Results: A CPG was found in 16 of 42 (38%) countries. In terms of population, this accounts for 645 million out of 838 million people (77%). A registry existed in 4 of the 42 (10%) countries assessed. This corresponds to 102 million out of 838 million (12%) people. In total, 4 out of 42 countries (10%) had both a CPG and a registry.
Conclusion: Our work shows numerous efforts in Europe to standardize CI care at the national level. While most people in Europe already live in countries with a CPG, this is not the case for CI registries. European-wide consensus on CPGs or registries does not yet exist. The present study thus provides a first assessment of the distribution of CI-related CPGs and registries.
Hintergrund und Fragestellung: Die Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2(SARS-CoV-2)-Pandemie hat die Ausbildung von Medizinstudierenden grundlegend verändert. Die Notwendigkeit von Kontaktbeschränkungen und die damit einhergehende Forderung nach Distanzunterricht hat dazu geführt, dass innerhalb kurzer Zeit digitale Lehrformate umgesetzt werden mussten. Ziel dieser Arbeit war die Auswertung der studentischen Evaluationsergebnisse für virtuellen Unterricht im Fach Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde während der SARS-CoV-2-Pandemie und ein Vergleich mit den zuvor erhobenen Evaluationsergebnissen unter Präsenzbedingungen.
Material und Methoden: Untersucht wurden die Evaluationsergebnisse für die Blockpraktika im Wintersemester 2020/21 und im Sommersemester 2021, die in einem virtuellen Format mit kurzer Präsenzphase durchgeführt wurden, sowie die der komplett im konventionellen Präsenzformat durchgeführten Praktika von Sommersemester 2018 bis Wintersemester 2019/20. Die anonyme Befragung der Studierenden bezog sich auf verschiedene Aspekte der Lehrveranstaltung, wie z. B. Organisation, Didaktik und Lernatmosphäre.
Ergebnisse: Von 16 abgefragten Kategorien zeigten 14 (87,5%) signifikant bessere Evaluationsergebnisse für die virtuellen Praktika verglichen mit den zuvor im Präsenzformat durchgeführten Praktika. Diese sehr positive Bewertung des digitalen Lehrangebots zeigte im Pandemieverlauf über die Dauer von zwei Semestern keine signifikante Änderung.
Schlussfolgerung: Die vorliegenden Daten belegen die hohe Akzeptanz eines digitalen Lehrangebots im Fach HNO-Heilkunde für Studierende. Auch wenn unerlässliche Bestandteile der ärztlichen Ausbildung, wie der Unterricht am Patienten und das Erlernen klinisch-praktischer Fertigkeiten, weiterhin nur im Präsenzformat realisiert werden können, legen die Ergebnisse nahe, dass digitale Elemente auch nach der SARS-CoV-2-Pandemie eine Rolle im Medizinstudium spielen könnten.