Institutes
Refine
Year of publication
- 2020 (7) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (7) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (7)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (7)
Keywords
- Cognitive archeology (2)
- Cognitive evolution (2)
- Niche construction (2)
- Argumentative theory of reasoning (1)
- Cultural evolution (1)
- Deductive logic (1)
- Kohärenz (1)
- Kooperation (1)
- Profession (1)
- Rational agency (1)
Institute
- Philosophie und Geschichtswissenschaften (7) (remove)
Explaining humans as rational creatures—capable of deductive reasoning—remains challenging for evolutionary naturalism. Schechter (Philosophical Perspectives, 24(1)437–464, 2011, 2013) proposes to link the evolution of this kind of reasoning with the ability to plan. His proposal, however, does neither include any elaborated theory on how logical abilities came into being within the hominin lineage nor is it sufficiently supported by empirical evidence. I present such a theory in broad outline and substantiate it with archeological findings. It is argued that the cognitive makeup of any animal is constituted by being embedded in a certain way of life. Changing ways of life thus foster appearances of new cognitive abilities. Finally, a new way of life of coordinated group behavior emerged within the hominins: anticipatory group planning involved in activities like making sophisticated spears for hunting. This gave rise to human logical cognition. It turned hominins into domain-general reasoner and adherents of intersubjective norms for reasoning. However, as I argue, it did not—and most likely could not—give rise to reason by deductive logic. More likely, deductive reasoning entered our world only a few thousand years ago: exclusively as a cultural artifact.
Stanley Cavell is one of very few philosophers who systematically reflect on the impact and influence of autobiographical detail, experience, and preferences on their philosophical work. The aim of this essay is to show how Cavell’s use of autobiographical exploration is rooted in his early aesthetic theory, in particular his view of the similarities between philosophy and aesthetic criticism. Cavell argues that criticism starts by exploiting and incorporating a subjective vantage point, eventually bringing the reader to test the significance of a work on herself. In his ‘Aesthetic Problems of Modern Philosophy’, Cavell states exactly this form of appeal to the ‘We’ of author and reader as the basic move of his own version of ‘ordinary language philosophy’. It is because of the connections Cavell sees between criticism and philosophy that his aesthetic diagnosis harks back on his overall critical style of thinking.
Rational agency is of central interest to philosophy, with evolutionary accounts of the cognitive underpinnings of rational agency being much debated. Yet one building block—our ability to argue—is less studied, except Mercier and Sperber’s argumentative theory (Mercier and Sperber in Behav Brain Sci 34(02):57–74, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x10000968 [Titel anhand dieser DOI in Citavi-Projekt übernehmen] , 2011, in The enigma of reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2017). I discuss their account and argue that it faces a lacuna: It cannot explain the origin of argumentation as a series of small steps that reveal how hominins with baseline abilities of the trait in question could turn into full-blown owners of it. This paper then provides a first sketch of the desired evolutionary trajectory. I argue that reasoning coevolves with the ability to coordinate behavior. After that, I establish a model based on niche construction theory. This model yields a story with following claims. First, argumentation came into being during the Oldowan period as a tool for justifying information ‘out of sight’. Second, argumentation enabled hominins to solve collective action problems with collaborators out of sight, which stabilized argumentative practices eventually. Archeological findings are discussed to substantiate both claims. I conclude with outlining changes resultant from my model for the concept of rational agency.
This article discusses the potential of a historical approach to sustainability transformations. Using environmental issues and governance structures as case studies, it first describes how historical “sustainability transformations” can be conceptualized. It then suggests that 19th-century constitutional reforms can be read as attempts at reaching fiscal sustainability, whereas some social reforms can be interpreted as attempts to render the capitalist economy sustainable. In conclusion, the article highlights that the primary value of historical approaches to sustainability transformations will not lie in models, but in encouraging more creative questions.
Ziel des Lehr-Lern-Projektes war die Schaffung einer kollegialen Arbeitsgemeinschaft zwischen Lehramtsstudierenden der hochschulischen Ausbildungsphase und bereits im Beruf etablierten Lehrkräften im Fachbereich Geschichte. Traditionell hierarchische Strukturen wurden aufgebrochen, um die jeweiligen Kompetenzen der Teilnehmenden für beide Seiten gewinnbringend zu vereinen. Anders als in den hochschulischen Praktika treten Lehramtsstudierende den Lehrkräften mit Expertise gegenüber: Der Austausch ist daher weniger einseitig als vielmehr von doppelseitigem Nutzen. Dieses Konzept bietet im Sinne einer community of practice nicht nur den Lehramtsstudierenden die Chance, ihr theoretisch erworbenes Wissen praxisorientiert anzuwenden und zu reflektieren, sondern ermöglicht auch den Lehrkräften, an den aktuellen geschichtsdidaktischen Forschungen und Entwicklungen an den Hochschulen teilzuhaben und mithilfe der Studierenden in der eigenen Schulpraxis zu reflektieren und gegebenenfalls anzuwenden. Anliegen des Lehr-Lern-Projektes ist ein Plädoyer, das Potenzial der Hochschulen über die eigenen Studierenden im Fortbildungsbereich der Lehrkräfte gewinnbringend zu nutzen, die schulische Reichweite von fachdidaktischer For-schung auszuschöpfen und den Lehramtsstudierenden zugleich eine weitere Möglichkeit einer schulpraktischen Erfahrung zu bieten. Nicht zuletzt: Die Verzahnung von Ausbildungs- und Weiterbildungsphase ist eine weitere gewinnbringende Möglichkeit, Akteur*innen der Lehrer*innenbildung in einen gewinnbringenden und praxisnahen Dialog zu bringen.