Institutes
Refine
Year of publication
- 2007 (46) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (46) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (46)
Keywords
- Kroatisch (37)
- Rezensionen (17)
- Kajkavisch (6)
- Lexikographie (3)
- Personennamenkunde (3)
- Familienname (2)
- Geschlechterforschung (2)
- Numerale (2)
- Phraseologie (2)
- Standardsprache (2)
Institute
- Extern (46)
Pope Benedict XVI’s Regensburg lecture has been exposed by some learned voices of 'the Muslim world' as alluding, by the means of one particular quotation, to age-old stereotypes about Islam being an essentially violent creed in which moderation through reason has no legitimate place, and of representing Muhammadas an evil and inhuman man who preached that Islam should be spread by the sword. While none of these presumably 'Muslim' voices deny that the Pope has the right to express his opinions, even when they are plainly wrong in the face of historic facts that show how Islam and Christianity were spread (or were made to spread) across the world, he is criticised for a host of omissions in terms of intellectual honesty and factual accuracy. These omissions, it is argued here, cast an unfortunate light on the compatibility of scientific and religious rationality much advocated by the Pope in his 12 September 2006 lecture. This flagrant 'performative contradiction' (Habermas) leaves room for speculation about the true aim of the speech. Is Benedict XVI's appeal to theology as a legitimate academic discipline a credible attempt to explicate Roman Catholicism's rightful place in a modern world governed by liberal democracy and ethical-political pluralism, or is it a reflection of a move to restore the age-old, intolerant, anti-scientific, and anti-democratic legacy of the pre-Vatican II Catholic Church?
U radu se daje pregled problema povezanih s normativnim statusom čestičnih/vezničkih skupina da li, je li i čestice/veznika li. Pokazuje se da postoji nekoliko pogrješaka povezanih s tumačenjem normativnog statusa i raspodjele tih skupina i te čestice te se provjerava normativno pravilo prema kojemu skupinu da li treba u standardnome jeziku zamijeniti česticom li (o tome se posve pogrješno često piše kao o zamjeni da li s je li, a skupina je li, s iznimkom skupine je li da koja ima funkciju dopunskoga pitanja, u standardnome jeziku ne postoji kao čestična/veznička skupina jer je njezin prvi član uvijek 3. lice prezenta glagola biti). Određuje se normativni status skupine je li, tj. pokazuje se da je ona u hrvatskome jeziku ili zastarjela ili da pripada razgovornomu stilu. Također se provjeravaju pravila u skladu s kojima se normativni status skupine da li u izravnome pitanju razlikuje od njezina statusa u neizravnome pitanju i prema kojima se skupina da li i u standardnome jeziku pojavljuje pri izricanju potvrdnosti te u alternativnim pitanjima. Donose se uvjeti zamjenjivosti skupina da li česticom/veznikom li, tj. izdvajaju se sintaktički konteksti u kojima ta zamjena nije potrebna ili nije moguća.
Schillers Balladen genießen einen mehrdeutigen Ruf: Ihre Popularität ist nicht zu bezweifeln, und fast jeder hat einzelne Wendungen und Bilder vor Augen wie jenen Kranichschwarm, der plötzlich dunkel über dem Theater erscheint. Aber die Balladen sind didaktisch in fragwürdiger Form instrumentalisiert worden – ‚23 Strophen bis zur nächsten Woche auswendig lernen’ – und zudem lassen sie sich nur schwer in den Entwicklungsgang der modernen Lyrik einordnen. (...) Dies hat zur Unterschätzung der Texte und auch zu einer intellektuellen Herabstufung geführt. (...) Nun erschließen sich ‚Die Kraniche des Ibycus’ in der Tat beim ersten Lesen dem Verständnis, aber sie enthalten gleichwohl ein Programm, und so sollen sie gedeutet werden: Als Popularisierung zentraler Postulate der Weimarer Klassik, als exotische Form poetologischer Ideen, die in anderen Texten Schillers, etwa in seinem Aufsatz über die ‚Schaubühne’ oder in seinen ‚Briefen über die ästhetische Erziehung’, in esoterischer Form vorliegen. (...) Die Implikationen der Ballade und im Besonderen das in ihr dargestellte Verhältnis von Kunst und Religion lassen sich am besten in jener Passage erfassen, in der das Theater und die Theateraufführung, die zur Enttarnung der Mörder führt, beschrieben werden.