BDSL-Klassifikation: 04.00.00 Allgemeine Literaturgeschichte > 04.03.00 Vergleichende Literaturgeschichte
The argument proceeds from the documentary hypothesis in modern biblical studies. This hypothesis is based on the assumption that the 1st 5 books of the Old Testament were written by four different authors at different times. These authors are known as J, P, E and D. Their writing was joined in the 5th c. B.C.E. into what became the Pentateuch and the first part of the Old Testament. The result of this joining was a series of contradictions and redundancies in the final text as we have it today. Readers of the Bible who seek to read it as one coherent text try to naturalize these contradictions by what I call "stitching." Stitching involves putting coherence back into the Pentateuch by accounting for the contradictions and redundancies in terms of plausibility and common logic. Modern authors who write versions of Old Testament stories, such as Thomas Mann in his "Joseph and his brothers", also engage in stitching. I demonstrate how Mann stitches a number of important episodes from the Patriarch saga. I discuss the effect of this process on the story line. I compare that to two other recent instances of biblical stitching in modern fiction. And I conclude with the argument that stitching in modern biblical hypertexts stems from the need for coherence in the modern realistic novel. This post-enlightenment coherence impulse is contrasted with myth and the latter's tolerance for loose ends and less than coherent narrative.
The Book of Job from the Old Testament is juxtaposed in detail with its hypertext in Thomas Mann's novel: the chapter where Jacob mourns for his "dead" Joseph. An argument is made that Mann's awareness of rabbinical literature creates a connection with the Akedah tradition, i.e., different ways of dealing with the sacrifice of Isaac by Abraham in Genesis. The notion that Abraham actually does kill Isaac, as suggested by a medieval rabbinical text, is interwoven into the analysis of Jacob's mourning for Joseph who appears as an Issaac-like sacrificial victim in Mann's novel. A connection is established between Abraham, Job and Jacob as figures whose children are claimed by God, and their reactions to this test are compared.
Entspricht das, was man in diesem Lande unter Intermedialitätsforschung versteht oder als solche betreibt, dem Lehr- und Forschungsbereich oder dem wissenschaftlichen Diskurs, der in den USA und anderswo vorläufig noch das Etikett "Interarts Studies" führt? Ich sage "vorläufig", weil dieses Etikett, wie noch zu zeigen ist, immer mißverständlicher und fragwürdiger wird und man vielleicht am besten den genannten Beispielen folgen und eine dem deutschen Usus nachgebildete Bezeichnung einführen sollte. Das erschiene aber wohl nur dann ratsam, wenn Intermedialitätsforschung und Interarts Studies in etwa deckungsgleich wären, wie Wolf und Wagner es voraussetzen, oder bei besserer gegenseitiger Kenntnisnahme von Intermedialitätsforschung und Interarts Studies man sie dazu bringen könnte, sich in Aufgabenstellung und Methodik und vor allem in der Wahl der Forschungsgegenstände einander weitgehend anzunähern. Vor allem aber ist zu klären, wie der Begriff "Intermedialität" verstanden wird und ob er so unproblematisch ist, wie es seine inzwischen gängige Verwendung aussehen läßt. Die folgenden Ausführungen können allerdings kaum mehr tun, als einige Antworten auf diese Fragen zu skizzieren.