Neofelis Verlag
Refine
Document Type
- Part of a Book (23)
- Book (5)
Language
- German (17)
- English (10)
- Multiple languages (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (28)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (28)
Keywords
- Anthrozoologie (10)
- Human-Animal Studies (9)
- Genauigkeit (7)
- Tiere (4)
- Unterricht (4)
- Imagination (3)
- Kunst (3)
- Tiere <Motiv> (3)
- Geschichtsunterricht (2)
- Mensch (2)
Liza B. Bauer looks at science fiction or speculative fiction writing - the literary genre par excellence for exploring alternative models of human-nonhuman coexistence. In her article "Reading to Stretch the Imagination: Exploring Representations of 'Livestock' in Literary Thought Experiments," she dissects processes of reciprocal negotiation between human and nonhuman beings in texts such as Sue Burke's "Semiosis" and Margaret Atwood's "Oryx and Crake" and "The Year of the Flood." Following Brian McHale's and Donna Haraway's credo that highly unlikely worlds encourage readers to critically reflect on current realities, Bauer addresses the following questions: What if chickens, cows, or pigs had the chance to exist for their own ends? What would happen if they could communicate in human language? Or if they were of superior intelligence? Would they subdue humankind, domesticate their co-inhabitants, or coexist harmoniously? By enacting these scenarios in literary storyworlds, SF proves to be particularly fertile ground, yielding insights into the current and future challenges of coexistence. As Bauer convincingly outlines, immersing ourselves in (science) fictional worlds to practice multispecies living does not seem too far removed from reality. The redistribution of animal agency shows that the passivity to which most livestock animals are condemned is not irrevocable. The well-being of both human and nonhuman animals will depend on whether it is possible to theoretically and practically broaden students' understanding of these entanglements. Since alternatives to animal commodification are thinkable in experimental SF storyworlds, they could constitute, Bauer argues, a significant step toward abolishing animal exploitation.
Roman Bartosch assesses the pedagogical potential of literature and the role of literary studies in an age of climate change, biodiversity loss, environmental destruction and degradation, and animal death and suffering. As he points out, these developments and students' responses to these various crises have received little or no attention in most educational contexts. Furthermore, many of today's curricular goals are essentially useless and meaningless for students facing an uncertain future. Bartosch asks us to reconsider what education could and should be in the Anthropocene, to acknowledge students' needs, and to reflect on why and how we teach literature and literary HAS in particular. As he also shows with his reading of Max Porter's novel "Grief Is the Thing with Feathers" (2015), engaging with literary and cultural animals can be a means to "[cultivate] an interest in acts of relating animality and textuality in ways that open up ambiguity and, thus, imaginative spaces for potential conviviality and flourishing." In contrast to the current emphasis on competencies, solutions, and teleological thinking, this kind of learning, Bartosch suggests, "is geared toward bearing witness, ruminating on its meanings, and thus repositioning oneself within a larger web of ecological and semiotic diversities under threat." Teaching literary HAS and emphasizing "[c]apabilities, resilience, and multispecies flourishing," then, could be important means of preparing students for the uncertain and perilous times ahead.
In "'Preventing Malicious and Wanton Cruelty to Animals': Historical Animal Welfare and Animal Rights Education," Andreas Hübner outlines future historical animal welfare and animal rights education, sketching concepts and themes such as animal agency and historicity as well as the relational, spatial, and material practices employed between humans and animals. Hübner then historicizes present-day attitudes toward anthropocentricism and discusses educational and learning processes that (can) help to overcome human-animal dichotomies in the history classroom. Hübner presents subject-specific recommendations for critically integrating topics into future curricula and shows that it is possible to teach in a way that acknowledges the role of nonhuman actors. He thereby challenges conventional human-centered narratives of historical learning.
Tiere im imperialen Diskurs : die Human-Animal Studies als Unterrichtsparadigma für das antike Rom
(2022)
Steffensen combines human-animal studies with the concept of new political history to explore innovative perspectives for teaching Roman history. He thus provides a framework that allows students to further their understanding of the political dimensions of historical consciousness and to enhance their orientation competency. Students learn to recognize and analyze power structures and relationships in historical and contemporary societies. According to Steffensen, HAS is of utmost significance for the initiation of this process. Animals played important roles in political decision-making processes in ancient Rome, and animals were meaning-making figures in governance discourses. Focusing on the practical and semantic functions of animals in the context of divination and the discourse of decadence, this essay shows that HAS can serve as a starting point for teaching in a way that addresses the formation and utilization of empire. However, Steffensen does not only seek to promote students' understanding of political processes in the past but also hopes to motivate students to assess modern-day politics.
Current objectives of human-animal studies : why the story of Harriet the tortoise should be retold
(2022)
In her article, "Current Objectives of Human-Animal Studies: Why the Story of Harriet the Tortoise Should Be Retold," Mieke Roscher responds to Haraway's call to action in "When Species Meet" in order to propose a political history of animals. To develop this new historiographical approach, she turns to concepts of agency and human-animal interaction as the most widely discussed paths to making visible the involvement of animals in "our" shared history. Built on the story of Harriet, a Galápagos tortoise and a decisive historical figure living in the Galápagos Islands during Darwin's visit in 1835, who died as recently as 2006, Roscher shows how praxiography, material culture, and spatial approaches could be connected to tell different stories to the ones currently being told by traditional historiography. Tortoises and turtles in particular have already influenced historical thinking, not least because they have come to symbolize the extinction discourse as well as debates on climatic change and the Anthropocene. Hence, Roscher introduces a political history of animals that pays attention to agency and relations (and agency as a relation), practices and materialities, spaces and places, and offers a way to retell Harriet's life story - and the life stories of many other animals - in the future.
In light of the dramatic growth and rapid institutionalization of human-animal studies in recent years, it is somewhat surprising that only a small number of publications have proposed practical and theoretical approaches to teaching in this inter- and transdisciplinary field. Featuring eleven original pedagogical interventions from the social sciences and the humanities as well as an epilogue from ecofeminist critic Greta Gaard, the present volume addresses this gap and responds to the demand by both educators and students for pedagogies appropriate for dealing with environmental crises. The theoretical and practical contributions collected here describe new ways of teaching human-animal studies in different educational settings and institutional contexts, suggesting how learners - equipped with key concepts such as agency or relationality - can develop empathy and ethical regard for the more-than-human world and especially nonhuman animals. As the contributors to this volume show, these cognitive and affective goals can be achieved in many curricula in secondary and tertiary education. By providing learners with the tools to challenge human exceptionalism in its various guises and related patterns of domination and exploitation in and outside the classroom, these interventions also contribute to a much-needed transformation not only of today's educational systems but of society as a whole. This volume is an invitation to beginners and experienced instructors alike, an invitation to (re)consider how we teach human-animal studies and how we could and should prepare learners for an uncertain future in, ideally, a more egalitarian and just multispecies world.
In light of the dramatic growth and rapid institutionalization of human-animal studies in recent years, it is somewhat surprising that only a small number of publications have proposed practical and theoretical approaches to teaching in this inter- and transdisciplinary field. Featuring eleven original pedagogical interventions from the social sciences and the humanities as well as an epilogue from ecofeminist critic Greta Gaard, the present volume addresses this gap and responds to the demand by both educators and students for pedagogies appropriate for dealing with environmental crises. The theoretical and practical contributions collected here describe new ways of teaching human-animal studies in different educational settings and institutional contexts, suggesting how learners - equipped with key concepts such as agency or relationality - can develop empathy and ethical regard for the more-than-human world and especially nonhuman animals. As the contributors to this volume show, these cognitive and affective goals can be achieved in many curricula in secondary and tertiary education. By providing learners with the tools to challenge human exceptionalism in its various guises and related patterns of domination and exploitation in and outside the classroom, these interventions also contribute to a much-needed transformation not only of today's educational systems but of society as a whole. This volume is an invitation to beginners and experienced instructors alike, an invitation to (re)consider how we teach human-animal studies and how we could and should prepare learners for an uncertain future in, ideally, a more egalitarian and just multispecies world.
Der Beitrag von Aurea Klarskov verhandelt die Genauigkeit als methodischer Parameter in der Etablierung eines neuen künstlerischen Mediums, nämlich der Videokunst. Im Zentrum steht ein Close Reading der frühen Videoarbeit "Slow Angle Walk (Beckett Walk)" (1968) des US-amerikanischen Künstlers Bruce Nauman, welches das Verhältnis von Körper und Technik herausarbeitet: Für die Laufzeit eines Videobandes wiederholt der Künstler eine kurze, gleichbleibende Bewegungssequenz so präzise und gleichmäßig wie möglich, was die Arbeit mit (selbst auferlegter) Körperdisziplinierung und subtilem Zwang rahmt. Der individuelle, verletzliche Körper steht dabei dem vorangegangenen 'Befehl', der die Bewegungen bestimmt sowie der scheinbar objektiv die Situation aufnehmenden Kamera, gegenüber. Diese frühe Arbeit nimmt die Leitthematik späterer Arbeiten Naumans vorweg: die Selbst- und Fremddisziplinierung des lebendigen Körpers, registriert durch die technische Genauigkeit des überwachenden Kameraauges.
Felix Hempe beschreibt eine dritte, zwischen quantitativer und qualitativer Sozialforschung vermittelnde Position der 'disziplinierten Subjektivität', die Siegfried Kracauer im Kontext des Methodendiskurses im US-amerikanischen Bureau of Applied Social Research in den 1950er Jahren entwickelte. Mit der Zuordnung von Genauigkeit zu statistischen Methoden und Präzision zur Beschreibung sozialer Verhältnisse, besteht Kracauer darauf, dass Genauigkeit im Sinne einer Exaktheit der Naturwissenschaften die sozialen Ereignisse und Bedingungen der Lebenswelt als eigentlicher Gegenstand der Sozialforschung nicht "präzise" genug bestimmen kann. Umgekehrt kann qualitative Forschung, die nicht zu einem gewissen Grad kodiert und operationalisierbar gemacht wird, keine Allgemeingültigkeit beanspruchen. Entscheidend wird in dieser Konstellation nun das, was Kracauer eine "disziplinierte Subjektivität" nennt. Methodisch kann sie erst dann gelingen, wenn beispielsweise kritisch reflektiert wird, wie die Imagination des Forschersubjekts vom zu untersuchenden Material angeregt wird. Hempe deutet dieses Verfahren deswegen auch als Vermittlung zwischen Genauigkeit und Imagination.
Lisa Cronjäger untersucht entlang einer aus dem 19. Jahrhundert stammenden forstwissenschaftlichen Taxationskarte von Claës Wilhelm Gyldén, auf welche Weise Zukunft als kartografische Projektion entworfen wird. Das Ziel von Gyldén, den Holzertrag eines Waldes prognostisch zu regulieren, wird hierbei über diagrammatische und kalkulatorische Berechnungs- und Darstellungsverfahren erst möglich gemacht. Die Imagination einer genauen Planbarkeit von Ressourcennutzung, kartografische Genauigkeit und die Unterdrückung von (subalternen) Waldnutzungspraktiken bedingen sich in dieser Konstellation gegenseitig.