• search hit 2 of 46
Back to Result List

A multi-scenario risk assessment strategy applied to mixtures of chemicals of emerging concern in the River Aconcagua basin in Central Chile

  • Highlights • 153 chemicals of emerging concern detected in complex multi-component mixtures. • 108 possible mixture risk assessment scenarios were investigated. • Non-detects, QSARs, and experimental ecotoxicological data were integrated for risk assessment. • 8 chemicals were the main risk drivers in at least one site across the River Aconcagua basin. Abstract Environmental risk assessments strategies that account for the complexity of exposures are needed in order to evaluate the toxic pressure of emerging chemicals, which also provide suggestions for risk mitigation and management, if necessary. Currently, most studies on the co-occurrence and environmental impacts of chemicals of emerging concern (CECs) are conducted in countries of the Global North, leaving massive knowledge gaps in countries of the Global South. In this study, we implement a multi-scenario risk assessment strategy to improve the assessment of both the exposure and hazard components in the chemical risk assessment process. Our strategy incorporates a systematic consideration and weighting of CECs that were not detected, as well as an evaluation of the uncertainties associated with Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSARs) predictions for chronic ecotoxicity. Furthermore, we present a novel approach to identifying mixture risk drivers. To expand our knowledge beyond well-studied aquatic ecosystems, we applied this multi-scenario strategy to the River Aconcagua basin of Central Chile. The analysis revealed that the concentrations of CECs exceeded acceptable risk thresholds for selected organism groups and the most vulnerable taxonomic groups. Streams flowing through agricultural areas and sites near the river mouth exhibited the highest risks. Notably, the eight risk drivers among the 153 co-occurring chemicals accounted for 66–92 % of the observed risks in the river basin. Six of them are pesticides and pharmaceuticals, chemical classes known for their high biological activity in specific target organisms.

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Pedro A. InostrozaORCiDGND, Sebastian ElguetaORCiD, Martin KraussORCiDGND, Werner BrackORCiDGND, Thomas BackhausORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-829626
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171054
ISSN:0048-9697
Parent Title (English):Science of The Total Environment
Publisher:Elsevier
Place of publication:Amsterdam
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Date of Publication (online):2024/02/22
Date of first Publication:2024/02/18
Publishing Institution:Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg
Release Date:2024/03/18
Tag:Micropollutants; Mixture risk assessment; QSARs; Risk drivers
Volume:921
Issue:171054
Article Number:171054
Page Number:12
Institutes:Biowissenschaften / Institut für Ökologie, Evolution und Diversität
Dewey Decimal Classification:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 33 Wirtschaft / 333 Boden- und Energiewirtschaft / 333.7 Natürliche Ressourcen, Energie und Umwelt
Sammlungen:Universitätspublikationen
Licence (German):License LogoCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0