Biological invasions and natural colonisations are different – the need for invasion science

  • In a recent Discussion Paper, Hoffmann and Courchamp (2016) posed the question: are biological invasions and natural colonisations that different? This apparently simple question resonates at the core of the biological study of human-induced global change, and we strongly believe that the answer is yes: biological invasions and natural colonisations differ in processes and mechanisms in ways that are crucial for science, management, and policy. Invasion biology has, over time, developed into the broader transdisciplinary field of invasion science. At the heart of invasion science is the realisation that biological invasions are not just a biological phenomenon: the human dimension of invasions is a fundamental component in the social-ecological systems in which invasions need to be understood and managed.

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:John R. U. Wilson, Pablo García-Díaz, Phillip Cassey, David M. Richardson, Petr Pyšek, Tim M. Blackburn
URN:urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-455968
DOI:https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.31.9185
Parent Title (English):NeoBiota
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2016
Publishing Institution:Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg
Release Date:2018/01/29
Tag:Invasion science; definitions; invasion biology
Volume:2016
Issue:31
Page Number:12
First Page:87
Last Page:98
HeBIS-PPN:426624211
Dewey Decimal Classification:5 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik / 57 Biowissenschaften; Biologie / 570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie
Sammlungen:Sammlung Biologie / Sondersammelgebiets-Volltexte
Zeitschriften / Jahresberichte:NeoBiota / NeoBiota 31
Journal:urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-455819
Licence (German):License LogoCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0