Refine
Year of publication
- 2015 (27) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (15)
- Doctoral Thesis (6)
- Book (3)
- Contribution to a Periodical (3)
Has Fulltext
- yes (27)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (27) (remove)
Keywords
- training (2)
- working memory (2)
- Adhärenz (1)
- Arbeitsgedächtnis (1)
- Autobiographisches Urteilen (1)
- Behandlungsdifferenzierung (1)
- Behandlungsintegrität (1)
- Berlin Affective Word List (BAWL) (1)
- Deutschland (1)
- Empirische Untersuchung (1)
Institute
- Psychologie (27) (remove)
Die vorliegende Dissertation zeigt, dass globale Kohärenz in Lebenserzählungen erst in der Adoleszenz entsteht und sich im Erwachsenenalter weiter entwickelt. Außerdem konnte gezeigt werden, dass die fragmentarische Nutzung der Lebensgeschichte in Form autobiographischen Urteilens in Zeiten tiefgreifender Lebensveränderungen zum Erhalt der Selbst-Kontinuität beiträgt.
Previous research on working memory (WM) in children with poor mathematical skills has yielded heterogeneous results, possibly due to inconsistent consideration of the IQ-achievement discrepancy and additional reading and spelling difficulties. To examine the impact of both, the WM of 68 average-achieving and 68 low-achieving third-graders in mathematics was assessed. Preliminary analyses showed that poor mathematical skills were associated with poor WM. Afterwards, children with isolated mathematical difficulties were separated from those with additional reading and spelling difficulties. Half of each group fulfilled the IQ-achievement discrepancy, resulting in a 2 (additional reading and spelling difficulties: yes/no) by 2 (IQ-achievement discrepancy: yes/no) factorial design. Analyses revealed that not fulfilling the IQ achievement discrepancy was associated with poor visual WM, whereas additional reading and spelling difficulties were associated with poor central executive functioning in children fulfilling the IQ-achievement discrepancy. Therefore, WM in children with poor mathematical skills differs according to the IQ-achievement discrepancy and additional reading and spelling difficulties.
Different types of altruistic behavior, namely help-giving, altruistic punishment, and moral courage, are identifiable and distinguishable in the literature, but little is known how they relate to each other. This is significant because understanding altruism and other-regarding behavior is important in the attempt to solve global problems of overpopulation and depletion of natural resources. Understanding the helping forms of altruism (help-giving and sharing) can be helpful, for example, when designing donation collections or recruiting volunteers. Understanding the punitive forms of altruism (moral courage and altruistic punishment) gives valuable insight on individuals participating in campaigns where there is a need to take action, for example, against polluters or governments that violate human rights. The empirical evidence presented in this dissertation demonstrate individual and cultural differences in help-giving, altruistic punishment, and morally courageous behavior. The willingness to engage in the three types of altruistic behaviors relate differently to subjectively preferred thinking style and to personality traits, both in real-life and on the Internet. The divergencies are observable between Eastern (Indian) and Western (German) cultures, where the overlap of oneself and other individuals is experienced in different levels.
Reading is not only "cold" information processing, but involves affective and aesthetic processes that go far beyond what current models of word recognition, sentence processing, or text comprehension can explain. To investigate such "hot" reading processes, standardized instruments that quantify both psycholinguistic and emotional variables at the sublexical, lexical, inter-, and supralexical levels (e.g., phonological iconicity, word valence, arousal-span, or passage suspense) are necessary. One such instrument, the Berlin Affective Word List (BAWL) has been used in over 50 published studies demonstrating effects of lexical emotional variables on all relevant processing levels (experiential, behavioral, neuronal). In this paper, we first present new data from several BAWL studies. Together, these studies examine various views on affective effects in reading arising from dimensional (e.g., valence) and discrete emotion features (e.g., happiness), or embodied cognition features like smelling. Second, we extend our investigation of the complex issue of affective word processing to words characterized by a mixture of affects. These words entail positive and negative valence, and/or features making them beautiful or ugly. Finally, we discuss tentative neurocognitive models of affective word processing in the light of the present results, raising new issues for future studies.
Conventional treatments for mood disorders primarily focus on reducing negative affect, but little on enhancing positive affect. Loving-kindness meditation (LKM) is a traditional meditation practice directly oriented toward enhancing unconditional and positive emotional states of kindness towards oneself and others. We report here two independent and uncontrolled studies carried out at different centers, one in Boston, USA (n = 10), and one in Frankfurt, Germany (n = 8), to examine the potential therapeutic utility of a brief LKM group intervention for symptoms of dysthymia and depression. Results at both centers suggest that LKM was associated with large-sized effects on self-reported symptoms of depression (d = 3.33 and 1.90), negative affect (d = 1.98 and 0.92), and positive affect (d = 1.63 and 0.94). Large effects were also found for clinician-reported changes in depression, rumination and specific positive emotions, and moderate effects for changes in adaptive emotion regulation strategies. The qualitative data analyses provide additional support for the potential clinical utility of the intervention. This proof-of-concept evaluation of LKM as a clinical strategy warrants further investigation.
Die vorliegende kumulative Dissertation befasst sich mit der Erfassung der Behandlungsintegrität bestehend aus psychotherapeutischer Adhärenz, Kompetenz sowie der Behandlungsdifferenzierung im Rahmen der Psychotherapieforschung. Die Überprüfung, ob Behandlungen bzw. Interventionen so wie intendiert durchgeführt wurden, ist für die Sicherstellung valider Schlussfolgerungen aus einer klinischen Studie von hoher Relevanz.
Die erste Studie untersucht, ob die Erfassung der Behandlungsintegrität ökonomischer gestaltbar ist. Es zeigte sich, dass Beurteilungen der Adhärenz und Kompetenz basierend auf Sitzungssegmenten im Vergleich zu ganzen Sitzungen keine Unterschiede aufweisen hinsichtlich Reliabilität, Validität und Prädiktion des Behandlungserfolgs.
In der zweiten Studie wird die Entwicklung und Validierung einer Adhärenz- und Kompetenzskala vorgestellt. Diese Studie weist zudem auf die Verwendung im Rahmen der Aus- und Weiterbildung von Therapeuten hin.
Die dritte Studie zeigt, dass in Psychotherapiestudien die im Vergleich stehenden Behandlungsbedingungen gut voneinander unterscheidbar sein müssen. Für die Beschreibung der Behandlungsdifferenzierung und -spezifität wurde der Behandlungs-Spezifitäts-Index entwickelt, dessen Eignung bestätigt werden konnte.
Die vierte Studie überprüft, ob sich erfolgreiche von nicht erfolgreichen Therapien hinsichtlich der psychotherapeutischen Kompetenz, Adhärenz und psychotherapeutischen Beziehung unterscheiden. Es zeigte sich, dass Adhärenz eine Voraussetzung für kompetentes Vorgehen darstellt. Kompetenz beeinflusst die psychotherapeutische Beziehung maßgebend, die mitentscheidend für den (Miss-)Erfolg einer Behandlung zu sein scheint.
Insgesamt tragen die Ergebnisse zu einer differenzierteren, spezifischeren und ökonomischeren Erfassung der Behandlungsintegrität innerhalb der Psychotherapieforschung bei. Gleichzeitig erweitern sie den Fokus auf neue Ansätze für zukünftige Forschungen.
South African Journal of Industrial and Organisational Psychology: Annual editorial overview 2015
(2015)
The present research investigates if and how a more digitally centered communication between supervisors and employees satisfies employees’ needs regarding the communication with their supervisors and influences employees’ attitudes toward the supervisor and the job. In a cross-sectional online study, 261 employees rated their supervisors’ actual and ideal use of different communication channels (i.e., telephone, face-to-face, email) regarding quality and quantity. Employees’ job satisfaction and their perceptions of their supervisors’ effectiveness and team identification were measured as dependent variables. Employees perceived face-to-face communication to be of higher quality than telephone and email communication, and they indicated a preference for more face-to-face communication with their supervisors than they actually had. Moreover, the perceived quality of communication, especially via face-to-face, was strongly and positively related to the dependent variables. These results provide insights into potential problems of increasing e-leadership in organizations. We conclude with recommendations to reduce these problems.