Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (263) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (263)
Keywords
- German (6)
- European Portuguese (5)
- Kuba (3)
- Speech (3)
- heritage speakers (3)
- Klassifikation (2)
- L2 (2)
- Oqaluttuaq (2)
- Phonology (2)
- Sprache (2)
Institute
- Neuere Philologien (263) (remove)
This paper presents three acceptability experiments investigating German verb-final clauses in order to explore possible sources of sentence complexity during human parsing. The point of departure was De Vries et al.'s (2011) generalization that sentences with three or more crossed or nested dependencies are too complex for being processed by the human parsing mechanism without difficulties. This generalization is partially based on findings from Bach et al. (1986) concerning the acceptability of complex verb clusters in German and Dutch. The first experiment tests this generalization by comparing two sentence types: (i) sentences with three nested dependencies within a single clause that contains three verbs in a complex verb cluster; (ii) sentences with four nested dependencies distributed across two embedded clauses, one center-embedded within the other, each containing a two-verb cluster. The results show that sentences with four nested dependencies are judged as acceptable as control sentences with only two nested dependencies, whereas sentences with three nested dependencies are judged as only marginally acceptable. This argues against De Vries et al.'s (2011) claim that the human parser can process no more than two nested dependencies. The results are used to refine the Verb-Cluster Complexity Hypothesis of Bader and Schmid (2009a). The second and the third experiment investigate sentences with four nested dependencies in more detail in order to explore alternative sources of sentence complexity: the number of predicted heads to be held in working memory (storage cost in terms of the Dependency Locality Theory [DLT], Gibson, 2000) and the length of the involved dependencies (integration cost in terms of the DLT). Experiment 2 investigates sentences for which storage cost and integration cost make conflicting predictions. The results show that storage cost outweighs integration cost. Experiment 3 shows that increasing integration cost in sentences with two degrees of center embedding leads to decreased acceptability. Taken together, the results argue in favor of a multifactorial account of the limitations on center embedding in natural languages.
L'osservazione secondo la quale lo scarto come oggetto di ricerca sia allo stesso tempo un effetto della sua ricerca è ciò che l'articolo traccia in tre studi sulla spazzatura: Rubbish! di William Rathje e Cullen Murphy, Un mondo usa e getta di Guido Viale e Das Miill-System di Volker Grassmuck e Christian Unverzagt. Questi tre studi esemplificano tre modi di presentare lo scarto: esplorazione, problema e ricie/aggio. Guardarli come argomenti scientifici ci permette di discutere di ciò che è considerato scarto ponendo domande di presentazione testuale e, allo stesso tempo, di chiedere quali conseguenze abbia la presentazione per il concetto scientifico dello scarto.
Als Peter Härtling am 7.11.2014 mit dem Hessischen Kulturpreis ausgezeichnet wird, spielt er auf die reformpädagogischen "fromme[n] Wünsche" an, die mit dem von Ellen Key 1902 ausgerufenen "Jahrhundert des Kindes" für das 20. Jahrhundert postuliert worden waren, und die, wie er selbst als Kind während und nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg erfahren musste, "unerfüllbar" gewesen seien. Sein Rückblick lässt ihn allerdings zu dem Schluss kommen, dass das 21. Jahrhundert noch "schlimmer" sei, denn es handele sich um das "Jahrhundert des Flüchtlingskindes". Es liegt folglich nahe, angesichts seines im Herbst 2016 erschienenen "Romans für Kinder", Djadi, Flüchtlingsjunge, auf den erinnernden Autor zu blicken, der mit 13 Jahren kurz nach Ende des Zweiten Weltkriegs zum Waisen wurde. ...