Refine
Year of publication
- 2017 (3202) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (1229)
- Part of Periodical (582)
- Part of a Book (303)
- Book (234)
- Doctoral Thesis (181)
- Review (160)
- Contribution to a Periodical (151)
- Working Paper (129)
- Report (112)
- Preprint (64)
Language
- English (1689)
- German (1394)
- Portuguese (44)
- Spanish (21)
- French (20)
- Multiple languages (16)
- Turkish (13)
- Ukrainian (2)
- Catalan (1)
- Hebrew (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3202)
Keywords
- taxonomy (65)
- Deutsch (60)
- Literatur (58)
- Financial Institutions (41)
- new species (40)
- Rezeption (28)
- Literaturwissenschaft (26)
- Fremdsprachenunterricht (24)
- Vergleichende Literaturwissenschaft (23)
- Banking Supervision (22)
Institute
- Medizin (381)
- Präsidium (285)
- Physik (236)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (215)
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (196)
- Sustainable Architecture for Finance in Europe (SAFE) (163)
- Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS) (115)
- Biowissenschaften (105)
- Neuere Philologien (105)
- Informatik (91)
In recent years, interest in the environmental occurrence and effects of microplastics (MPs) has shifted towards our inland waters, and in this chapter we provide an overview of the issues that may be of concern for freshwater environments. The term ‘contaminant of emerging concern’ does not only apply to chemical pollutants but to MPs as well because it has been detected ubiquitously in freshwater systems. The environmental release of MPs will occur from a wide variety of sources, including emissions from wastewater treatment plants and from the degradation of larger plastic debris items. Due to the chemical makeup of plastic materials, receiving environments are potentially exposed to a mixture of micro- and nano-sized particles, leached additives, and subsequent degradation products, which will become bioavailable for a range of biota. The ingestion of MPs by aquatic organisms has been demonstrated, but the long-term effects of continuous exposures are less well understood. Technological developments and changes in demographics will influence the types of MPs and environmental concentrations in the future, and it will be important to develop approaches to mitigate the input of synthetic polymers to freshwater ecosystems.
The diagnosis that we are living in a world risk society formulated by Ulrich Beck 20 years ago (Beck, Kölner Z Soziol Sozialpsychol 36:119–147, 1996) has lost nothing of its power, especially against the background of the Anthropocene debate. “Global risks” have been identified which are caused by human activities, technology, and modernization processes. Microplastics are a by-product of exactly these modernization processes, being distributed globally by physical processes like ocean currents, and causing effects far from their place of origin. In recent years, the topic has gained great prominence, as microplastics have been discovered nearly everywhere in the environment, raising questions about the impacts on food for human consumption. But are microplastics really a new phenomenon or rather a symptom of an old problem? And exactly what risks are involved? It seems that the phenomenon has accelerated political action—the USA has passed the Microbead-Free Waters Act 2015—and industries have pledged to fade out the use of microbeads in their cosmetic products. At first sight, is it a success for environmentalists and the protection of our planet?
This chapter deals with these questions by adopting a social-ecological perspective, discussing microplastics as a global risk. Taking four main characteristics of global risks, we develop four arguments to discuss (a) the everyday production of risk by societies, (b) scientific risk evaluation of microplastics, (c) social responses, and (d) problems of risk management. To illustrate these four issues, we draw on different aspects of the current scientific and public debate. In doing so, we contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the social-ecological implications of microplastics.
The ubiquitous detection of microplastics in aquatic ecosystems promotes the concern for adverse impacts on freshwater ecosystems. The wide variety of material types, sizes, shapes, and physicochemical properties renders interactions with biota via multiple pathways probable.
So far, our knowledge about the uptake and biological effects of microplastics comes from laboratory studies, applying simplified exposure regimes (e.g., one polymer and size, spherical shape, high concentrations) often with limited environmental relevance. However, the available data illustrates species- and material-related interactions and highlights that microplastics represent a multifaceted stressor. Particle-related toxicities will be driven by polymer type, size, and shape. Chemical toxicity is driven by the adsorption-desorption kinetics of additives and pollutants. In addition, microbial colonization, the formation of hetero-aggregates, and the evolutionary adaptations of the biological receptor further increase the complexity of microplastics as stressors. Therefore, the aim of this chapter is to synthesize and critically revisit these aspects based on the state of the science in freshwater research. Where unavailable we supplement this with data on marine biota. This provides an insight into the direction of future research.
In this regard, the challenge is to understand the complex interactions of biota and plastic materials and to identify the toxicologically most relevant characteristics of the plethora of microplastics. Importantly, as the direct biological impacts of natural particles may be similar, future research needs to benchmark synthetic against natural materials. Finally, given the scale of the research question, we need a multidisciplinary approach to understand the role of microplastics in a multiple-particle world.
"Ihr sollt euch nicht zu den Götzen wenden, und gegossene Götter sollt ihr euch nicht machen [...](Lev 19,4) [...] sollen wir nicht meinen, daß das Göttliche dem Gold und Silber oder Stein, einem Gebilde der Kunst und der Erfindung des Menschen gleich sei. (Acta 17,29) Pfui über euch und über das, was ihr an Gottes Statt verehrt! [...] (Q 21,67)"
Diese drei Sätze stammen nacheinander aus der hebräischen Bibel, dem Neuen Testament und dem Koran. Man kann sie beinahe wie einen Text lesen, an dem sich die These des Ägyptologen Jan Assmann belegen ließe, dass mit der Herausbildung monotheistischer Religionen wie Judentum, Christentum und Islam im Allgemeinen und dem Bilderverbot im Besonderen die Unterscheidung zwischen wahr und falsch in die Götterwelt gekommen sei (Assmann 1998, S. 17). ...
Es wäre eine bessere Welt, würde es diese Bilder nicht geben: Die Rede ist von Darstellungen, die sexuellen Missbrauch von und sexualisierte Gewalt an Kindern und Jugendlichen zeigen. Die physischen und psychischen Verletzungen, die durch den Missbrauch, aber auch durch dessen Perpetuierung in Bildern verursacht werden, sind unermesslich. Daher greift die Gesellschaft zu einem ihrer schärfsten Schwerter – dem Strafrecht.
Mit flexiblen Video-Endoskopen gelingen heute hochaufgelöste Bilder des Magen-Darm-Traktes. Bösartige Tumoren werden früher erkannt und oft auch entfernt, ohne die Bauchdecke aufzuschneiden. Sogar Verengungen der Gallenwege lassen sich mit hochpräziser Endoskopietechnik darstellen und behandeln. Die Medizinische Klinik 1 der Universitätsklinik unter der Leitung von Prof. Dr. Stefan Zeuzem gehört zu den Pionieren auf diesem Gebiet.
Lieblingsbild
(2017)
In lebende Körper zu sehen, ohne das Messer anzusetzen, das war lange ein Traum von Wissenschaftlern und Ärzten. Was vor mehr als 120 Jahren mit Conrad Röntgens Entdeckung der X-Strahlen begann, hat sich mit Magnetenzephalographie und Magnetresonanztomographie zu gängigen Instrumenten der Hightech-Medizin entwickelt.
Lieblingsbild
(2017)
Dieses Bild ist wichtig, weil wir daran verstanden haben, wie in der Zelle fehlerhaftes Spleißen verhindert wird. Dazu muss man wissen, dass unsere Gene sich aus Exons und dazwischenliegenden Introns zusammensetzen. Während des Spleißens werden die Introns entfernt und die Exons in ein reifes Transkript zusammengefügt, das dann für ein Protein kodiert. Allerdings gibt es innerhalb der Introns viele Bereiche, die einem Exon sehr ähnlich sehen. Werden diese sogenannten "PseudoExons" fälschlicherweise während des Spleißprozesses erkannt und in das reife Transkript eingebaut, kann das fatale Folgen für das kodierte Protein und oft die gesamte Zelle haben. ...