Refine
Year of publication
- 2013 (3) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (2)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- Bologna-Prozess (1)
- Exzellenzinitiative (1)
- Germanistik (1)
- Theorie (1)
- Zukunft (1)
Men and women differ substantially regarding height, weight, and body fat. Interestingly, previous work detecting genetic effects for waist-to-hip ratio, to assess body fat distribution, has found that many of these showed sex-differences. However, systematic searches for sex-differences in genetic effects have not yet been conducted. Therefore, we undertook a genome-wide search for sexually dimorphic genetic effects for anthropometric traits including 133,723 individuals in a large meta-analysis and followed promising variants in further 137,052 individuals, including a total of 94 studies. We identified seven loci with significant sex-difference including four previously established (near GRB14/COBLL1, LYPLAL1/SLC30A10, VEGFA, ADAMTS9) and three novel anthropometric trait loci (near MAP3K1, HSD17B4, PPARG), all of which were significant in women, but not in men. Of interest is that sex-difference was only observed for waist phenotypes, but not for height or body-mass-index. We found no evidence for sex-differences with opposite effect direction for men and women. The PPARG locus is of specific interest due to its link to diabetes genetics and therapy. Our findings demonstrate the importance of investigating sex differences, which may lead to a better understanding of disease mechanisms with a potential relevance to treatment options.
Ausgangsfragen: Was sind die grundlegenden methodisch-theoretischen Veränderungen des Faches in den vergangenen dreißig bis vierzig Jahren? Welchen Stellenwert haben Methoden und Theorien heute im Fach? In welchem Verhältnis steht die germanistische zur allgemeinen Methoden- und Theoriereflexion in den Geisteswissenschaften? Befinden wir uns am Ende des 'theoretischen Zeitalters'? Hat die Konzentration auf Methodik und Theorie das Fach der gebildeten Öffentlichkeit noch mehr als ohnehin entfremdet? Worin bestünden bzw. existieren überhaupt Alternativen zur Theorie? Etwa in Form einer Renaissance von Biographie oder Hermeneutik? Braucht das Fach überhaupt eine breite Debatte über seine theoretischen Horizonte und methodischen Standards? Oder sind andere Fragen vordringlicher, etwa eine stärkere Reflexion der gesellschaftlichen Aufgaben der Germanistik?
Above 1 MeV of incident neutron energy the fission fragment angular distribution (FFAD) has generally a strong anisotropic behavior due to the combination of the incident orbital momentum and the intrinsic spin of the fissioning nucleus. This effect has to be taken into account for the efficiency estimation of devices used for fission cross section measurements. In addition it bears information on the spin deposition mechanism and on the structure of transitional states. We designed and constructed a detection device, based on Parallel Plate Avalanche Counters (PPAC), for measuring the fission fragment angular distributions of several isotopes, in particular 232Th. The measurement has been performed at n_TOF at CERN taking advantage of the very broad energy spectrum of the neutron beam. Fission events were recognized by back to back detection in coincidence in two position-sensitive detectors surrounding the targets. The detection efficiency, depending mostly on the stopping of fission fragments in backings and electrodes, has been computed with a Geant4 simulation and validated by the comparison to the measured case of 235U below 3 keV where the emission is isotropic. In the case of 232Th, the result is in good agreement with previous data below 10 MeV, with a good reproduction of the structures associated to vibrational states and the opening of second chance fission. In the 14 MeV region our data are much more accurate than previous ones which are broadly scattered.