Biochemie und Chemie
Refine
Year of publication
- 2009 (158) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (81)
- Doctoral Thesis (69)
- Book (5)
- Report (3)
Has Fulltext
- yes (158)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (158)
Keywords
- Gentherapie (3)
- ADC (2)
- Biochemie (2)
- Crystallography (2)
- HIV (2)
- Kraftmikroskopie (2)
- Licht-Sammel-Komplex (2)
- Ligand <Biochemie> (2)
- Membranproteine (2)
- Quantenchemie (2)
Institute
- Biochemie und Chemie (158)
- Medizin (7)
- Biowissenschaften (5)
- Pharmazie (4)
- Zentrum für Biomolekulare Magnetische Resonanz (BMRZ) (3)
- Exzellenzcluster Makromolekulare Komplexe (2)
- Geographie (2)
- Geowissenschaften (2)
- Informatik (2)
- Mathematik (2)
Kraftfelder sind ein vielseitiges Werkzeug zur schnellen Berechnung vielfältiger Moleküleigenschaften. Die Qualität der damit erhaltenen Vorhersagen ist auch ein Maß, wie gut die wichtigen Einflussgrößen verstanden und vor allem in das Kraftfeld-Modell integriert sind. Bei der Parametrisierung müssen viele Effekte gegeneinander ausbalanciert werden, da die Kraftfeldterme nicht unabhängig voneinander betrachtet werden können. Umfangreiche Testrechnungen sind erforderlich, um die notwendige Qualität der Parameter sicher zu stellen. Eine Automatisierung dieses Prozesses bringt nicht nur eine enorme Zeitersparnis, sie zwingt auch zur sorgfältigen Definition von Vorgaben und Qualitätskriterien. Die Formulierung einer Strategie in einem Programm anstelle von „intelligentem Raten“ fördert zudem ein tieferes Verständnis. Bei einer Änderung der Strategie muss nur das entsprechende Programm geändert werden, dem Entwickler bleibt der manuelle Test erspart. Automatische Methoden zur Plausibilitätsprüfung vermeiden Probleme durch Fehler bei der Dateneingabe von Hand. Die programmgesteuerte Erstellung aussagekräftiger Protokolle und Grafiken macht die Fülle der bei der Parametrisierung und Evaluierung eines Kraftfeldes anfallenden Informationen für den Benutzer überschaubar. Probleme und deren Zusammenhang können so leichter erfasst werden. Für das MOMO-Kraftfeld konnten auf diese Weise verbesserte und neue Parameter für Wasserstoffbrücken abgeleitet werden, zwei empirische Punktladungsmodelle und deren Verträglichkeit mit zwei quantenchemischen Modellen verbessert und prinzipielle Probleme bei deren Vereinbarkeit erkannt werden sowie die automatische Parametrisierung von Bindungslängen, Bindungswinkeln und Torsionswinkeln ermöglicht werden. Bei Letzterem konnte jedoch keine Verbesserung gegenüber den Originalparametern erreicht werden, was nicht weiter verwunderlich ist, da diese seit Jahrzehnten entwickelt worden sind, wohingegen Wasserstoffbrücken und Partialladungen erst später hinzugekommen sind und nicht so umfangreich wie die bindenden Kraftfeldterme getestet wurden. Voraussetzung für die hier gewählte Vorgehensweise, alle Arbeiten weitgehend zu automatisieren und Strategien immer in Programme umzusetzen, waren sehr umfangreiche Programmierarbeiten. Ziel war es, auf einfache Weise die Steuerung des Kraftfeldes aus kleineren Programmen, die spezielle Probleme bearbeiten, zuzulassen. Durch die Nutzung zahlreicher Open-Source-Projekte, die gemeinsam die gewünschte Funktionalität zur Verfügung stellen, konnte der Aufwand auf die dazu passende Implementierung des MOMO-Kraftfeldes und das Verbinden mit der von diesen Projekten bereitgestellten Software beschränkt werden. Der Kern des MOMO-Kraftfeldes wurde aus Geschwindigkeitsgründen in der Compilersprache C geschrieben, Datenein- und -ausgabe und die Programme zur Parametrisierung und Auswertung wurden in Python geschrieben.
The asymmetric unit of the title compound, [K(C3H3N2)(C12H24O6)], is composed of a potassium cation bonded to the six O atoms of a crown ether molecule and the two N atoms of a pyrazolate anion. The K...O distances range from 2.8416 (8) to 3.0025 (8) Å, and the two K...N distances are 2.7441 (11) and 2.7654 (11) Å. The K cation is displaced by 0.8437 (4) Å from the best plane through the six O atoms. The latter plane is almost perpendicular to the plane of the pyrazolate ring [dihedral angle 83.93 (3)°]. Key indicators: single-crystal X-ray study; T = 173 K; mean σ(C–C) = 0.002 A°; R factor = 0.026; wR factor = 0.066; data-to-parameter ratio = 16.5.
In the title Grignard reagent, [MgBr(C12H9)(C5H10O)2], the Mg centre adopts a distorted tetrahedral MgCO2Br arrangement. The dihedral angle between the two aromatic rings of the biphenyl residue is 44.00 (14)°. Each molecule incorporates one R- and one S-configured 2-methyltetrahydrofuran molecule. Key indicators: single-crystal X-ray study; T = 173 K; mean σ(C–C) = 0.007 Å; R factor = 0.045; wR factor = 0.108; data-to-parameter ratio = 17.4.
The title compound, C20H22O2, crystallizes with two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit. In each molecule, all the non-H atoms lie in a common plane (r.m.s. deviations of 0.098 and 0.079 Å). There is a [pi]-[pi] stacking interaction in the crystal structure. The central aromatic rings of the two molecules, which are stacked head-to-tail one above the other, are separated by centroid-to-centroid distances of 3.872 (13) and 3.999 (10) Å. Key indicators: single-crystal X-ray study; T = 173 K; mean σ(C–C) = 0.003 A° ; R factor = 0.044; wR factor = 0.101; data-to-parameter ratio = 14.6.
The title compound, C17H18N2O6, crystallizes with two molecules in the asymmetric unit. In both molecules, one of the C-C bonds of the pentamethylene chain connecting the two aromatic rings is in a trans conformation and another displays a gauche conformation. The aromatic rings within each molecule are nearly coplanar [dihedral angles = 3.36 (9) and 4.50 (9)°] and the nitro groups are twisted slightly out of the planes of their attached rings [dihedral angles = 8.16 (3)/6.6 (2) and 4.9 (4)/3.8 (3)°]. Key indicators: single-crystal X-ray study; T = 173 K; mean σ(C–C) = 0.003 Å; R factor = 0.040; wR factor = 0.101; data-to-parameter ratio = 13.5.
The title compound, C14H6Cl6N2OS·0.5CHCl3, crystallizes with four 1-(2,6-dichlorobenzoyl)-3- (2,3,5,6-tetrachlorophenyl)thiourea molecules and two trichloromethane molecules in the asymmetric unit. The thiourea molecules exist in the solid state in their thione forms with typical thiourea C-S and C-O bonds lengths, as well as shortened C-N bonds. The -NH-C(=S)-NH-C(=O)- plane is almost perpendicular to the benzene ring in each thiourea molecule. Intramolecular N-H...O hydrogen bonds stabilize the molecular conformation and intermolecular N-H...S hydrogen bonds stabilize the packing arrangement. Key indicators: single-crystal X-ray study; T = 173 K; mean σ(C–C) = 0.004 Å; R factor = 0.051; wR factor = 0.147; data-to-parameter ratio = 23.2.
The crystal structure of the title compound, C14H8Cl4N2OS, is composed of discrete molecules with bond lengths and angles quite typical for thiourea compounds of this class. The plane containing the central SONNCC atom set subtends a dihedral angle of 31.47 (3)° with the benzene ring. An intramolecular N-H...O hydrogen bond stabilizes the molecular conformation and the molecules form centrosymmetric dimers via intermolecular N-H...S hydrogen bonds. Key indicators: single-crystal X-ray study; T = 173 K; mean σ(C–C) = 0.002 Å; R factor = 0.032; wR factor = 0.087; data-to-parameter ratio = 17.9.
The two aromatic rings in the title compound, C15H12Cl2N2O2S, enclose a dihedral angle of 37.49 (6)°. The molecule exists in the solid state in its thione form with typical thiourea C-S and C-O bonds lengths, as well as shortened C-N bonds. An intramolecular N-H...O hydrogen bond stabilizes the molecular conformation. In the crystal, molecules are connected by N-H...O and N-H...S hydrogen bonds, forming chains running along the alpha axis. Key indicators: single-crystal X-ray study; T = 173 K; mean σ (C–C) = 0.002 Å; disorder in main residue; R factor = 0.035; wR factor = 0.087; data-to-parameter ratio = 18.9.
The title molecule, C16H15ClN2OS, exists in the solid state in its thione form with typical thiourea C-S and C-O bonds lengths, as well as shortened C-N bonds. An intramolecular N-H...O hydrogen bond stabilizes the molecular conformation and intermolecular N-H...S hydrogen bonds link the molecules into centrosymmetric dimers. The dihedral angle between the aromatic rings is 50.18 (5)°. Key indicators: single-crystal X-ray study; T = 173 K; mean σ(C–C) = 0.002 Å; R factor = 0.032; wR factor = 0.085; data-to-parameter ratio = 15.3.
The structure of the title compound, C14H9Cl3N2OS, is composed of discrete molecules with bond lengths and angles quite typical for thiourea compounds of this class. The plane containing the thiocarbonyl and carbonyl groups subtends dihedral angles of 48.19 (3) and 87.51 (3)° with the planes formed by the 3-chloro and 2,6-dichlorophenyl rings, respectively; the dihedral angle between the two benzene ring planes is 45.32 (3)°. An intramolecular N-H...O hydrogen bond stabilizes the molecular conformation and the molecules form intermolecular N-H...S and N-H...O hydrogen bonds, generating a sheet along the alpha axis. Key indicators: single-crystal X-ray study; T = 173 K; mean σ(C–C) = 0.002 Å; R factor = 0.037; wR factor = 0.094; data-to-parameter ratio = 25.5.
The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C14H8Cl4N2OS·0.5H2O, contains two independent molecules with different conformations with respect to the aromatic ring planes, and one water molecule. The bond lengths and angles are typical of thiourea compounds of this class. The molecule exists in the solid state in its thione form with typical thiourea C-S and C-O bonds lengths, as well as shortened C-N bonds. The dihedral angles between the two aromatic planes are 66.93 (8) and 60.44 (9)° in the two independent molecules. An intramolecular N-H...O hydrogen bond stabilizes the molecular conformation and the crystal packing is characterized by N-H...O, O-H...S and O-H...Cl hydrogen bonds. Key indicators: single-crystal X-ray study; T = 173 K; mean σ(C–C) = 0.004 Å; R factor = 0.045; wR factor = 0.125; data-to-parameter ratio = 16.8.
The title compound, C14H9Cl3N2OS, has bond lengths and angles which are quite typical for thiourea compounds of this class. The molecule exists in the solid state in its thione form with typical thiourea C=S and C=O bond lengths, as well as shortened C-N bonds. An intramolecular N-H...O hydrogen bond stabilizes the molecular conformation. Intermolecular N-H...S hydrogen bonds link the molecules to form centrosymmetric dimers. Key indicators: single-crystal X-ray study; T = 173 K; mean σ(C–C) = 0.002 A° ; R factor = 0.029; wR factor = 0.078; data-to-parameter ratio = 17.2.
There are two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit of the title compound, C19H24S2. In both molecules, the aliphatic segment of the ligand is in an all-trans conformation: the –S–(CH2)5–S–bridging chain is almost planar (r.m.s. deviation for all non-H atoms = 0.0393 and 0.0796 Å in the two molecules) and maximally extended. Their mean planes form dihedral angles of 4.08 (6)/20.47 (6) and 2.22 (6)/58.19 (6)° with the aromatic rings in the two molecules. The crystal packing is purely governed by weak intermolecular forces.
The title compound, C16H14N4, features an aromatic ring with two 2,2´-dicyanopropyl residues in positions 1 and 3, which are located above and below the ring plane. The two residues differ in their conformation with respect to the aromatic ring: whereas one of the Cmethyl-C-Cmethylene-Caromatic torsion angles is gauche [68.93 (12)°], the other one is fully staggered [177.63 (9)°]. The crystal structure is stabilized by C-H...N hydrogen-bonding interactions. Key indicators: single-crystal X-ray study; T = 173 K; mean σ(C–C) = 0.002 Å; R factor = 0.037; wR factor = 0.101; data-to-parameter ratio = 15.0.
The title compound, C21H16N2O2, was derived from 1-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-3-(-methoxyphenyl)propane-1,3-dione. The molecular structure of the title compound is stabilized by an intramolecular O-H...N hydrogen bond. The dihedral angle between the hydroxyphenyl ring involved in this intramolecular hydrogen bond and the pyrazole ring is significantly smaller [10.07 (6)°] than the dihedral angle between the pyrazole and the other hydroxyphenyl ring [36.64 (5)°]. The benzene ring makes a dihedral angle of 54.95 (3)° with the pyrazole ring. The crystal packing is stabilized by O-H...O and O-H...N hydrogen bonds. Key indicators: single-crystal X-ray study; T = 173 K; mean σ(C–C) = 0.002 Å; R factor = 0.039; wR factor = 0.101; data-to-parameter ratio = 16.2.
The title compound, C22H18N2O2, was derived from 1-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)propane-1,3-dione. The central pyrazole ring forms dihedral angles of 16.83 (5), 48.97 (4) and 51.68 (4)°, respectively, with the methoxyphenyl, phenyl and hydroxyphenyl rings. The crystal packing is stabilized by O-H...N hydrogen bonding. Key indicators: single-crystal X-ray study; T = 173 K; mean σ(C–C) = 0.002 Å; R factor = 0.037; wR factor = 0.096; data-to-parameter ratio = 17.0.
Single crystals of the title compound, C10H11NO4, an intermediate in the industrial synthesis of yellow azo pigments, were obtained from the industrial production. The molecules crystallize as centrosymmetic dimers connected by two symmetry-related N—H⋯O=C hydrogen bonds. Each molecule also contains an intramolecular N—H⋯O=C hydrogen bond. The dimers form stacks along the a-axis direction. Neighbouring stacks are arranged into a herringbone structure.
2-Chloro-5-nitroaniline
(2009)
The molecule of the title compound, C6H5ClN2O2, is close to being planar (rms deviation = 0.032 Å for all non-H atoms), with a maximum deviation of -0.107 (3) Å for an O atom. In the crystal structure, intermolecular N-H...O and N-H...N interactions link the molecules into a three-dimensional network. Key indicators: single-crystal X-ray study; T = 173 K; mean σ(C–C) = 0.002 A°; R factor = 0.023; wR factor = 0.061; data-to-parameter ratio = 11.8.
Crystals of the title compound, C12H8N2·C7H8O2, were obtained during cocrystallization experiments of a compound with two hydrogen-bond donors (2-hydroxybenzyl alcohol) with another compound containing two hydrogen-bond acceptors (phenanthroline). Unexpectedly, the two molecules do not form dimers with two O—H ... N hydrogen bonds connecting the two molecules. However, one of the hydroxy groups forms a bifurcated hydrogen bond to both phenanthroline N atoms, whereas the other hydroxy group forms an O—H ... O hydrogen bond to a symmetry-equivalent 2-hydroxybenzyl alcohol molecule. In addition, the crystal packing is stabilized by Pi – Pi interactions between the two phenanthroline ring systems, with a centroid–centroid distance of 3.570 Å.
In the molecule of the title compound, C14H16ClN3O, the benzene and pyrazole rings are oriented at a dihedral angle of 3.50 (3)°. In the crystal structure, intermolecular N-H...O hydrogen bonds link the molecules into chains. A [pi]-[pi] contact between the benzene and pyrazole rings [centroid-centroid distance = 3.820 (3) Å] may further stabilize the structure. Key indicators: single-crystal X-ray study; T = 173 K; mean σ(C–C) = 0.002 Å; R factor = 0.031; wR factor = 0.086; data-to-parameter ratio = 14.1.