Biochemie und Chemie
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (1112)
- Doctoral Thesis (728)
- Book (46)
- Preprint (32)
- Contribution to a Periodical (14)
- Conference Proceeding (11)
- Report (11)
- Review (9)
- diplomthesis (3)
- Part of a Book (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (1974)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (1974)
Keywords
- crystal structure (37)
- Crystal Structure (25)
- Synthesis (15)
- ESR Spectra (14)
- RNA (14)
- NMR-Spektroskopie (12)
- hydrogen bonding (11)
- IR Spectra (10)
- NMR spectroscopy (10)
- RNS (9)
Institute
- Biochemie und Chemie (1974)
- Medizin (83)
- Exzellenzcluster Makromolekulare Komplexe (68)
- Biowissenschaften (64)
- Präsidium (64)
- Zentrum für Biomolekulare Magnetische Resonanz (BMRZ) (63)
- Pharmazie (52)
- MPI für Biophysik (49)
- Sonderforschungsbereiche / Forschungskollegs (48)
- Georg-Speyer-Haus (22)
In the title compound, C27H19N3O4, the phenol and pyrazole rings are almost coplanar [dihedral angle = 0.95 (12)°] due to an intramolecular O—H ... N hydrogen bond, whereas the phenyl ring is tilted by 40.81 (7)° with respect to the plane of the pyrazole ring. The aromatic ring with a nitrophenoxy substituent makes a dihedral angle of 54.10 (7)° with the pyrazole ring.
The title compound, C15H14N2O4, has a trans–gauche [O/C/C/C–O/C/C/C] (TG) conformation. The angle between the planes of aromatic rings is 76.4 (3)°. The crystal structure is stabilized by van der Waals interactions and C—H ... O hydrogen bonds. The crystal used was a non-merohedral twin with a fractional contribution of the minor component of 0.443 (5).
The title compound, C8H11FN5 +·Cl-, crystallized with a monoprotonated 1-(4-fluorophenyl)biguanidinium cation and a chloride anion in the asymmetric unit. The biguanidium group is not planar [dihedral angle between the two CN3 groups = 52.0 (1)°] and is rotated with respect to the phenyl group [tau = 54.3 (3)°]. In the crystal, N—H ... N hydrogen-bonded centrosymmetric dimers are connected into ribbons, which are further stabilized by N—H ... Cl interactions, forming a three-dimensional hydrogen-bonded network.
The title compound, [Na(CF3O3S)(C12H24O6)], features a sodium cation that is coordinated by eight O atoms in an irregular hexagonal bipyramidal environment. The equatorial positions are occupied by the six O atoms of an 18-crown-6 ether ring. In the axial positions, there is one O atom of a trifluoromethanesulfonate anion and an ether O atom of a symmetry-equivalent crown ether ring. In this way, centrosymmetric dimers are formed.
The asymmetric unit of the title compound, [K(C5HF6N2)(H2O)2]n, is composed of two 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)pyrazolide anions, two potassium cations and four water molecules. The water molecules and 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)pyrazolide anions act as bridges between the potassium cations. Each potassium cation is surrounded by four O atoms [K—O = 2.705 (3)–2.767 (3) Å] and four F atoms [K—F = 2.870 (7)–3.215 (13) Å]. The water molecules and the 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)pyrazolide anions are connected by O—H ... N hydrogen bonds, forming layers in the ab plane. All –CF3 groups show rotational disorder between two orientations each.
The two rings in the title compound, C11H12N2O4S, are roughly coplanar [dihedral angle = 6.77 (8)°]. Whereas the two outer methyl groups of the three methoxy groups are almost coplanar with the aromatic ring to which they are attached [C—C—O—C torsion angles = 8.5 (3) and -8.3 (3)°], the methyl group of the central methoxy substituent is not [C—C—C—C = -78.4 (3)°]. The crystal packing is stabilized by N—H ... O hydrogen bonding.
In the title compound, C11H11N3O2, the dihedral angle between the central ethanone fragment and the 4-methoxyphenyl group is 2.9 (2)°, while that between the ethanone fragment and the triazole ring is 83.4 (2)°. The dihedral angle between the planes of the triazole and benzene rings is 81.7 (1)°. The 4-methoxyphenyl group is cis with respect to the ethanone fragment O atom across the exocyclic C—C bond. In the crystal, molecules are linked by C—H ... N interactions into C(9) chains along [001].
The central structural element of the title compound, C24H29NO2, is a carbazole unit substituted with two acetyl residues and an octyl chain. The acetyl residues are nearly coplanar [dihedral angles = 5.37 (14) and 1.0 (3)°] with the carbazole unit which is essentially planar (r.m.s. deviation for all non-H atoms = 0.025 Å). The octyl chain adopts an all-trans conformation. The crystal packing is stabilized by C—H ... O hydrogen bonds.
17-Acetoxymulinic acid
(2010)
The title compound, [systematic name: 5a-acetoxymethyl-3-isopropyl-8-methyl-1,2,3,3a,4,5,5a,6,7,10,10a,10b-dodecahydro-7,10-endo-epidioxycyclohepta[e]indene-3a-carboxylic acid], C22H32O6 (I), is closely related to methyl 5a-acetoxymethyl-3-isopropyl-8-methyl-1,2,3,3a,4,5,5a,6,7,10,10a,10b-dodecahydro-7,10-endo-epidioxycyclohepta[e]indene-3a-carboxylate, (II) [Brito et al., (2008 [triangle]). Acta Cryst. E64, o1209]. There are two molecules in the asymmetric unit, which are linked by two strong intramolecular O—H ... O hydrogen bonds with graph-set motif R 2 2(8). In both (I) and (II), the conformation of the three fused rings are almost identical. The five-membered ring has an envelope conformation, the six-membered ring has a chair conformation and the seven-membered ring has a boat conformation. The most obvious differences between the two compounds is the observed disorder of the acetoxymethyl fragments in both molecules of the asymmetric unit of (I). This disorder is not observed in (II). The crystal structure and the molecular conformation is stabilized by intermolecular C—H ... O hydrogen bonds. The ability to form hydrogen bonds is different in the two compounds. The crystal studied was a non-merohedral twin, the ratio of the twin components being 0.28 (1):0.72 (1)
In the title compound, C4H7N3O·C2H6OS, creatinine [2-amino-1-methyl-1H-imidazol-4(5H)one] exists in the amine form. The ring is planar (r.m.s. deviation for all non-H atoms = 0.017 Å). In the crystal, two creatinine molecules form centrosymmetric hydrogen-bonded dimers linked by pairs of N—H[cdots, three dots, centered]N hydrogen bonds. In addition, creatinine is linked to a dimethyl sulfoxide molecule by an N—H[cdots, three dots, centered]O interaction. The packing shows layers parallel to (120).
The title compound, [Li3(C4F9O)3(C3H6O)3], features an open Li/O cube with an Li ion missing at one corner. Three of the four bridging O atoms of the cube carry a fluorinated tert-butyl residue, whereas the fourth is part of an acetone molecule. Two of the Li atoms are further bonded to a non-bridging acetone molecule. Two of the lithium ion coordination geometries are very distorted LiO4 tetrahedra; the third could be described as a very distorted LiO3 T-shape with two distant F-atom neighbours. The Li[cdots, three dots, centered]Li contact distances for the three-coordinate Li+ ion [2.608 (14) and 2.631 (12) Å] are much shorter that the contact distance [2.940 (13) Å] between the tetrahedrally coordinated species.
The title compound, [Tl4(C4H9O)4], featuring a (Tl—O)4 cube, crystallizes with a quarter-molecule (located on a special position of site symmetry An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is e-66-m1621-efi1.jpg..) and a half-molecule (located on a special position of site symmetry 23.) in the asymmetric unit. The Tl—O bond distances range from 2.463 (12) to 2.506 (12) Å. All O—Tl—O bond angles are smaller than 90° whereas the Tl—O—Tl angles are wider than a rectangular angle.
In the crystal of the title compound, C8H8ClN3S, molecules are connected by N—H[cdots, three dots, centered]S hydrogen bonds into strips parallel to the (112) planes and running along [110]. One of the amino H atoms is not involved in a classical hydrogen bond. In addition, there is a rather short intermolecular Cl ... S distance of 3.3814 (5) Å.
In the title compound, C15H14N2O4, (I), the molecule lies on a twofold rotation axis which passes through the central C atom of the aliphatic chain, giving one half-molecule per asymmetric unit. The structure is a monoclinic polymorph of the triclinic structure previously reported [Brito, Vallejos, Bolte & López-Rodríguez (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, o792], (II). The most obvious difference between them is the O/C/C/C—O/C/C/C torsion angle [58.2 (7)° in (I) and 173.4 (3)/70.2 (3)° in (II) for GG and TG conformations, respectively]. Another important difference is observed in the dihedral angle between the planes of the aromatic rings [86.49 (7)° for (I) and 76.4 (3)° for (II)]. The crystal structure features a weak pi–pi interaction [centroid–centroid distance = 4.1397 (10)Å]; this latter kind of interaction is not evident in the triclinic polymorph.
The title compound, C15H25N5, is an aminalization product between 2,6-diacetylpyridine and 1,3-diaminopropane. It crystallizes with two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit with different conformations. In the first molecule, the methyl groups are cis oriented with respect to the pyridine ring [N—C—C—C torsion angles = 72.5 (1) and 80.3 (1)°], while they are trans oriented in the second molecule [N—C—C—C torsion angles = 82.6 (1) and -90.8 (1)°]. Each of the two molecules forms centrosymmetric dimers held together by N—H[cdots, three dots, centered]N hydrogen bonds, thus forming R 2 2(16) rings. The two dimers are interlinked by additional N—H[cdots, three dots, centered]N bonds into R 4 4(14) rings, building chains along the a axis. These patterns influence the orientation (either equatorial or axial) of the N—H bonds.
Seit der TIMSS- und PISA-Studie sind sie wieder einmal Thema der bildungspolitischen Diskussion: die naturwissenschaftlichen Fächer in unseren Schulen. Deutschen Schülerinnen und Schülern wird bescheinigt: Sie haben nur mangelnde Kenntnisse, verstehen zu wenig, sind nicht recht in der Lage, Fragestellungen methodisch anzugehen, und denken zu wenig darüber nach, wie sie naturwissenschaftliche Probleme lösen könnten. Aber auch viele Erwachsene geben offen zu, besonders von den »harten« Naturwissenschaften wie Chemie wenig zu verstehen und sich nie besonders dafür interessiert zu haben. Wie kommt es, dass eine Wissenschaft, die wesentlich zum Verständnis unserer stofflichen Umwelt beiträgt und deren praktische Anwendung unser tägliches Leben in hohem Maße beeinflusst, auf ein so geringes Interesse stößt?
Chemiker stehen in ihrer Mentalität Architekten nahe: Sie planen und bauen Moleküle. Schon lange, bevor der atomare Aufbau der Materie experimentell bewiesen war, entwickelten sie genaue Vorstellungen über die Raumstruktur von Molekülen. Erst zu Beginn des 20.Jahrhunderts wurden diese "Arbeitshypothesen" – zum Beispiel das von Jacobus van’t Hoff postulierte Tetraedermodell für den vierbindigen Kohlenstoff – von den Physikern glänzend bestätigt. Zwar ist es mittlerweile möglich, die Struktur von unbekannten Molekülen zuverlässig vorherzusagen; doch nach wie vor sind genaue experimentelle Strukturbestimmungen ein unverzichtbarer Bestandteil vieler Forschungsprojekte.
The analysis of biomolecular macrocomplexes requires certain preconditions to be fulfilled. The preparation of biomolecular samples usually results in low yields. Due to this constraint of low availability any method should provide a sufficient sensitivity to cope with typical sample amounts. Biomolecules also often show a reduced stability, i.e. a propensity for fragmentation upon ionisation, which requires reasonable soft methods for the investigation. Furthermore macromolecular complexes usually are composed by means of non-covalent interactions presenting additional demands on the softness. This holds true for specific complexes like protein-ligand or DNA double strand binding. For the formation of non-covalent, specific complexes the biomolecules’ native structure and environment are a basic prerequisite and hence crucial. Therefore it is desirable during analysis to keep the biomolecules in a native environment to preserve their structure and weak interactions. One suitable method for analysing biomolecules is mass spectrometry. Mass spectrometry is capable of high throughput screening as well as determining masses with high accuracy and high sensitivity. Especially since the availability of MALDI-MS and ESI-MS mass spectrometry evolved to a versatile tool to investigate biomolecular complexes. Both, MALDI- and ESI-MS are sufficiently soft methods to observe fragile biomolecules. Yet both methods have their advantages and disadvantages. During the recent years an alternative mass spectrometric approach has been developed in our group, termed LILBID-MS (Laser Induced Liquid Bead Ionisation/Desorption). In LILBID microdroplets of aqueous solution containing buffer, salt and further additives among the analyte molecules are injected into vacuum and irradiated one-by-one by mid-IR laser pulses. The absorption of the energy by the water leads to a rapid ablation of the preformed analyte ions. LILBID is highly tolerant for the addition of salts and detergents allowing to study biomolecular complexes in a native environment. As LILBID-MS is soft enough to avoid fragmentation, specific non-covalent complexes can be analysed directly from their native environment by this method. In addition dissociation can be induced on demand by increasing the laser intensity which allows for the study of subunit compositions. A further prominent property of LILBID is the possibility to study hydrophobic membrane proteins due to the tolerated use of detergents. During the course of this work, several instrumental improvements mostly concerning ion focussing and beam steering were introduced. Together with refinements of different modes of measurement the result is a significantly improved signal-to-noise ratio as well as a further improvement in sensitivity. In addition the accessible m/z range for a given flight time has been vastly increased. The new possibilities that LILBID now offers for the study of biomolecular complexes were investigated. The ability to detect specific binding in LILBID-MS was investigated by means of nucleic acids and their interaction with proteins. It could be shown that the stability of a 16bp dsDNA corresponds to that in solution phase regarding the dependency on concentration and type of the salts used. In addition a competitive experiment with the well-known transcription factor p50 was used to demonstrate the detection of sequence-specific binding with LILBID. The improved sensitivity allowed to detect single stranded DNA at nanomolar concentrations and even the 2686bp plasmid pUC19 could be easily detected without fragmentation using a concentration of only 80nM. In case of the transcription factor p63 the mass spectrometric analysis could help to identify a new model of activation and inhibition. For the first time known quarternary structures of membrane proteins like the light-driven proton pump bacteriorhodopsin and the potassium channel KcsA could be detected with mass spectrometry. For the light-driven proton pump proteorhodopsin the type and the concentration of the used detergents significantly influenced the stability of this protein as well as the preferred quarternary structure.