Institut für Ökologie, Evolution und Diversität
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (341)
- Preprint (31)
- Doctoral Thesis (24)
- Part of Periodical (7)
- Book (5)
- Contribution to a Periodical (3)
- Part of a Book (2)
- Conference Proceeding (2)
- Periodical (1)
Language
- English (384)
- German (19)
- Multiple languages (7)
- French (6)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (416)
Keywords
- Invasive species (10)
- Biodiversity (9)
- Biogeography (9)
- taxonomy (8)
- Thailand (5)
- phylogeny (5)
- Biodiversität (4)
- Community ecology (4)
- Ecological modelling (4)
- Ecology (4)
Institute
- Institut für Ökologie, Evolution und Diversität (416) (remove)
Species is the fundamental taxonomic unit in biology and its delimitation has implications for conservation. In giraffe (Giraffa spp.), multiple taxonomic classifications have been proposed since the early 1900s.1 However, one species with nine subspecies has been generally accepted,2 likely due to limited in-depth assessments, subspecies hybridizing in captivity,3,4 and anecdotal reports of hybrids in the wild.5 Giraffe taxonomy received new attention after population genetic studies using traditional genetic markers suggested at least four species.6,7 This view has been met with controversy,8 setting the stage for debate.9,10 Genomics is significantly enhancing our understanding of biodiversity and speciation relative to traditional genetic approaches and thus has important implications for species delineation and conservation.11 We present a high-quality de novo genome assembly of the critically endangered Kordofan giraffe (G. camelopardalis antiquorum)12 and a comprehensive whole-genome analysis of 50 giraffe representing all traditionally recognized subspecies. Population structure and phylogenomic analyses support four separately evolving giraffe lineages, which diverged 230–370 ka ago. These lineages underwent distinct demographic histories and show different levels of heterozygosity and inbreeding. Our results strengthen previous findings of limited gene flow and admixture among putative giraffe species6,7,9 and establish a genomic foundation for recognizing four species and seven subspecies, the latter of which should be considered as evolutionary significant units. Achieving a consensus over the number of species and subspecies in giraffe is essential for adequately assessing their threat level and will improve conservation efforts for these iconic taxa.
Reconstructing the evolution of baleen whales (Mysticeti) has been problematic because morphological and genetic analyses have produced different scenarios. This might be caused by genomic admixture that may have taken place among some rorquals. We present the genomes of six whales, including the blue whale (Balaenoptera musculus), to reconstruct a species tree of baleen whales and to identify phylogenetic conflicts. Evolutionary multilocus analyses of 34,192 genome fragments reveal a fast radiation of rorquals at 10.5 to 7.5 million years ago coinciding with oceanic circulation shifts. The evolutionarily enigmatic gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus) is placed among rorquals, and the blue whale genome shows a high degree of heterozygosity. The nearly equal frequency of conflicting gene trees suggests that speciation of rorqual evolution occurred under gene flow, which is best depicted by evolutionary networks. Especially in marine environments, sympatric speciation might be common; our results raise questions about how genetic divergence can be established.
Background: Correct species identification of blow flies is a crucial step for understanding their biology, which can be used not only for designing fly control programs, but also to determine the minimum time since death. Identification techniques are usually based on morphological and molecular characters. However, the use of classical morphology requires experienced entomologists for correct identification; while molecular techniques rely on a sound laboratory expertise and remain ambiguous for certain taxa. Landmark-based geometric morphometric analysis of insect wings has been extensively applied in species identification. However, few wing morphometric analyses of blow fly species have been published.
Methods: We applied a landmark-based geometric morphometric analysis of wings for species identification of 12 medically and forensically important blow fly species of Thailand. Nineteen landmarks of each right wing of 372 specimens were digitised. Variation in wing size and wing shape was analysed and evaluated for allometric effects. The latter confirmed the influence of size on the shape differences between species and sexes. Wing shape variation among genera and species were analysed using canonical variates analysis followed by a cross-validation test.
Results: Wing size was not suitable for species discrimination, whereas wing shape can be a useful tool to separate taxa on both, genus and species level depending on the analysed taxa. It appeared to be highly reliable, especially for classifying Chrysomya species, but less robust for a species discrimination in the genera Lucilia and Hemipyrellia. Allometry did not affect species separation but had an impact on sexual shape dimorphism.
Conclusions: A landmark-based geometric morphometric analysis of wings is a useful additional method for species discrimination. It is a simple, reliable and inexpensive method, but it can be time-consuming locating the landmarks for a large scale study and requires non-damaged wings for analysis.
Wo wächst die Palmyrapalme? : mit Satellitendaten praxistaugliche Verbreitungskarten erstellen
(2008)
Die äthiopische Palmyrapalme (Borassus aethiopum) mit einer Wuchshöhe von bis zu 30 Metern gehört zu den größten afrikanischen Palmenarten. Ihr Erhalt ist für die Menschen in Benin und Burkina Faso von großer Bedeutung, denn sie stellen aus den Blättern der Palme Matten, Körbe und Hüte her. Die melonengroßen, glänzend orangen Früchte sind essbar. Inzwischen geht das Verbreitungsgebiet dieser wichtigen Nutzart stark zurück. ...
Anfang Februar veröffentlichte die Pressestelle der Goethe-Universität die Meldung „In der Stadt bauen Kaninchen dichter: Große Bauten für die ländliche Großfamilie, kleine Bauten für das städtische Pärchen.“ Die Meldung beruhte auf einem Fachartikel der Arbeitsgruppe Ökologie und Evolution im Journal of Zoology. Rasend schnell verbreitete sich die Meldung in den Medien – wir haben Madlen Ziege, Doktorandin in der Arbeitsgruppe Ökologie und Evolution einmal danach befragt, wie die Forschung mit populären oder besser: popularisierten Meldungen umgeht.