Linguistik-Klassifikation
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (59)
- Article (29)
- Working Paper (19)
- Review (8)
- Conference Proceeding (3)
- Book (2)
- Periodical (1)
- Part of Periodical (1)
- Report (1)
Language
- English (64)
- German (44)
- Portuguese (6)
- Multiple languages (4)
- Croatian (3)
- mis (2)
Keywords
- Kontrastive Linguistik (37)
- Deutsch (31)
- Linguistik (22)
- Vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft (22)
- Sprachtypologie (21)
- Syntax (21)
- Semantik (20)
- Spracherwerb (11)
- Tschechisch (11)
- Verb (11)
- Kopula (10)
- Morphologie (10)
- Morphologie <Linguistik> (10)
- Phonologie (8)
- Prädikat (8)
- Prosodie (7)
- Russisch (7)
- Topik (6)
- Adjunkt <Linguistik> (5)
- Kontrastive Phraseologie (5)
- Spanisch (5)
- Aspekt <Linguistik> (4)
- Aufsatzsammlung (4)
- Kroatisch (4)
- Modifikation <Linguistik> (4)
- Phraseologie (4)
- Polnisch (4)
- Portugiesisch (4)
- werden <Wort> (4)
- Adverb (3)
- Chinesisch (3)
- Englisch (3)
- Französisch (3)
- Intonation <Linguistik> (3)
- Italienisch (3)
- Lautmalerei (3)
- Metapher (3)
- Modifikator (3)
- Portugiesisch / Brasilien (3)
- Sinotibetische Sprachen (3)
- Wortbildung (3)
- Zeitschrift (3)
- Anapher <Syntax> (2)
- Anglizismus (2)
- Aspekt (2)
- Bibliografie (2)
- Comic (2)
- Drung (2)
- Formel (2)
- Germanistik (2)
- Interjektion (2)
- Interkulturalität (2)
- Kindersprache (2)
- Kollokation (2)
- Kongress (2)
- Kontrastive Phonetik (2)
- Kontrastive Textlinguistik (2)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (2)
- Lehnwort (2)
- Lexikographie (2)
- Literaturwissenschaft (2)
- Nomen (2)
- Nominalisierung (2)
- Nominalphrase (2)
- Optimalitätstheorie (2)
- Phonetik (2)
- Prädikation (2)
- Schwedisch (2)
- Slowakisch (2)
- Sprachwandel (2)
- Thema-Rhema-Gliederung (2)
- Tibetobirmanische Sprachen (2)
- Vergleichende Literaturwissenschaft (2)
- bleiben (2)
- sein <Wort> (2)
- Adverbiale (1)
- Altkirchenslawisch (1)
- Altkroatisch (1)
- Applikativ (1)
- Argument <Linguistik> (1)
- Arzneipackungsbeilage (1)
- Autobiographie (1)
- Bantusprachen (1)
- Berufsbezeichnung (1)
- Bezug / Linguistik (1)
- Bildersprache (1)
- Brasilien (1)
- Brevier (1)
- Deutschland (1)
- Diachronie (1)
- Dialektologie (1)
- Ergebnis (1)
- Ergänzung <Linguistik> (1)
- Evidentialität (1)
- Expressivität <Linguistik> (1)
- Finnisch (1)
- Fremdsprachenlernen (1)
- Funktion (1)
- Funktionale Kategorie (1)
- Generative Grammatik (1)
- Generative Transformationsgrammatik (1)
- Genitiv (1)
- Genus (1)
- Geschlechterstereotyp (1)
- Gesellschaft (1)
- Gesprochene Sprache (1)
- Glagoliza (1)
- Griechisch (1)
- Hethitisch (1)
- Informationsstruktur (1)
- Instrumental (1)
- Interaktion (1)
- Interferenz (1)
- Kajkavisch (1)
- Kommunikation (1)
- Kompositum (1)
- Konsonant (1)
- Kontrastive Grammatik (1)
- Kontrastive Morphologie (1)
- Konvention (1)
- Konvergenztheorie (1)
- Koordination <Linguistik> (1)
- Kopulasatz (1)
- Kurzwort (1)
- KwaNdebele (1)
- Lautwandel (1)
- Leipzig <2001> (1)
- Lexikalische Kategorie (1)
- Litauisch (1)
- Literarische Übersetzung (1)
- Lokativ (1)
- Manga (1)
- Maya-Sprache (1)
- Mediensprache (1)
- Methodologie (1)
- Mitteleuropa (1)
- More <Linguistik> (1)
- Morphosyntax (1)
- Neugriechisch (1)
- Nungisch (1)
- Ortsadverb (1)
- Oslo <1999> (1)
- Packungsbeilage (1)
- Partizip Perfekt (1)
- Partizip Präsens (1)
- Passiv (1)
- Personenbezeichnung (1)
- Phonem (1)
- Possessivität (1)
- Pragmatik (1)
- Pronomen (1)
- Proto-Tibetobirmanisch (1)
- Reduktionismus (1)
- Reibelaut (1)
- Resultativ (1)
- Silbe (1)
- Silbentrennung (1)
- Slowenisch (1)
- Spaltsatz (1)
- Sprache (1)
- Sprachkontakt (1)
- Sprachmischung (1)
- Sprachsystem (1)
- Sprachunterricht (1)
- Sprachvergleich (1)
- Synchronie (1)
- Syntaktische Kongruenz (1)
- Tagalog (1)
- Textlinguistik (1)
- Textsorte (1)
- Thematische Relation (1)
- Türkei (1)
- Valenz (1)
- Valenzwörterbuch (1)
- Verbalphrase (1)
- Verbvalenz (1)
- Vokal (1)
- Wahldebatten (1)
- Werbespot (1)
- Wissenschaftlicher Text (1)
- Wortart (1)
- Wortspiel (1)
- Zorn <Motiv> (1)
- ficar (1)
- koreferenzielle Pro-Formen (1)
- nominale Anredeformen (1)
- sprachliche Handlung (1)
- Übersetzung (1)
Institute
It is argued that there is a surprising gap in the distribution of adverbial modifiers, namely that there are (practically) no adverbs that modify exclusively stative verbs. Given the general range of selectional restrictions associated with adverb/verb modification, this comes as a surprise. It is argued that this gap cannot be the result of standard selectional restrictions. An independently motivated account of the state-event verb contrast, in which state verbs are proposed to lack Davidsonian arguments is presented and argued to account for this stative adverb gap. Some apparent and real problems with the analysis are discussed.
Editorial preface
(2000)
The present issue grew out of two sources. The main one was the workshop on Adding and Omitting (A & 0) held during the DGfS Conference organized in Konstanz at the beginning of 1999 by our ZAS project on Syntax der Fokusbildung. The purpose of the workshop was to bring together people working on topicalization (addition of expressions, in a sense) and ellipsis (omission, i.e. deletion of linguistic material) and their relations and interaction. Since the workshop was very successful and met with a great deal of interest on the part of both participants and outsiders, we decided to collect and publish the papers that were presented. Towards the end of 1999, a follow-up workshop on Ellipsis and Information Structure was organized by Kerstin Schwabe and Susanne Winkler (Tübingen). The papers given at this second meeting were supposed to be an integral part of the publication as well. More and more people got involved, further developing our common understanding of the topic phenomenon, so that there was too much material for a single volume. We therefore decided to split the enterprise into two volumes. The ellipsis papers are to be published by 'Benjamins' this year in Interpreting Omitted Structures.
On the early development of aspect in greek and russian child language, a comparative analysis
(2003)
The category of aspect is grammaticized in both Greek and Russian opposing perfective and imperfective verb forms in all inflectional categories except the nonpast (‘present’). Despite these similarities there are important differences in the way the aspectual systems function in the two languages. While in Greek nearly all verbs oppose a perfective to a given imperfective grammatical form, Russian aspect is more strongly lexicalized with pairs of imperfective and perfective lexemes not only differing aspectually, but also as far as their lexical meanings are concerned. This is especially true of perfective verbs formed by prefixes as compared to their imperfective bases. Thus, in pairs of prefixed and unprefixed dynamic verbs, the derived prefixed (perfective) member has a telic meaning while its unprefixed (imperfective) counterpart is atelic (e.g. sjest’ (PFV) ‘to eat up’ vs. jest’ (IPF) ‘to eat’). Such derived perfective verbs may in turn be “secondarily” imperfectivized by suffixation furnishing the only “true” perfective/imperfective pairs of verbs (e.g. sjest’ (PFV) ‘to eat up’ vs. sjedat’ (IPF) ‘to eat up’ (iterative)). “Secondary” imperfectives do not occur in our child data.
In this pilot study, we will analyze the tense-aspect-mood forms of the 20 most frequent verbs with equivalent meanings occurring in the longitudinal audiotaped data of a Greek and a Russian boy between 2;1 and 2;3 (their entire lexical inventories comprise approx. 100 verbs each).
We adopt a constructivist perspective on the development of aspect in Greek and Russian child language and will show that in spite of a broad inventory of imperfective and perfective verb forms to be found in the speech of both children aspect has not yet developed into a generalized grammatical category, but is strongly dependent on aktionsart (stative/dynamic, telic/atelic) in both languages. While this results in a strong preference for perfective verb forms of telic verbs and of imperfective forms of atelic ones in the speech of the Greek boy, the Russian child tends to use the unmarked members.
This 18th issue of ZAS-Papers in Linguistics consists of papers on the development of verb acquisition in 9 languages from the very early stages up to the onset of paradigm construction. Each of the 10 papers deals with first-Ianguage developmental processes in one or two children studied via longitudinal data. The languages involved are French, Spanish, Russian, Croatian, Lithuanien, Finnish, English and German. For German two different varieties are examined, one from Berlin and one from Vienna. All papers are based on presentations at the workshop 'Early verbs: On the way to mini-paradigms' held at the ZAS (Berlin) on the 30./31. of September 2000. This workshop brought to a close the first phase of cooperation between two projects on language acquisition which has started in October 1999:
a) the project on "Syntaktische Konsequenzen des Morphologieerwerbs" at the ZAS (Berlin) headed by Juergen Weissenborn and Ewald Lang, and financially supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, and
b) the international "Crosslinguistic Project on Pre- and Protomorphology in Language Acquisition" coordinated by Wolfgang U. Dressler in behalf of the Austrian Academy of Sciences.
Acquisition of aspect
(2003)
In these conclusions we can deal only with some of the tentative comparative results of the workshop papers on the early development of verb morphology. The main focus is on criteria of how the child detects morphology and how this emerging morphological competence develops in its earliest phases. In view of the purpose and tentative character of these conclusions, all references will be limited to the papers of the workshop and to earlier studies by workshop participants within the "Crosslinguistic Project on Pre- and Protomorphology in Language Acquisition". Much more will be given in the projected final publication.
Introduction
(2000)
(Non)retroflexivity of slavic affricates and its motivation : Evidence from polish and czech <č>
(2005)
The goal of this paper is two-fold. First, it revises the common assumption that the affricate <č> denotes /t͡ʃ/ for all Slavic languages. On the basis of experimental results it is shown that Slavic <č> stands for two sounds: /t͡ʃ/ as e.g. in Czech and /ʈʂ/ as in Polish.
The second goal of the paper is to show that this difference is not accidental but it is motivated by perceptual relations among sibilants. In Polish, /t͡ʃ/ changed to /ʈʂ/ thus lowering its sibilant tonality and creating a better perceptual distance to /tɕ/, whereas in Czech /t͡ʃ/ did not turn to /ʈʂ/, as the former displayed sufficient perceptual distance to the only affricate present in the inventory, namely, the alveolar /t͡s/. Finally, an analysis of Czech and Polish affricate inventories is offered.
This volume presents working versions of presentations heard at and selected for the Workshop on Syntax of Predication, held at ZAS, Berlin, on November 2-3, 2001 (except the editor’s own paper).
Predication is a many-faceted topic which involves both syntax and semantics and the interface between them. This is reflected in the papers of the volume.
The distribution of trimoraic syllables in German and English as evidence for the phonological word
(2000)
In the present article I discuss the distribution of trimoraic syllables in German and English. The reason I have chosen to analyze these two languages together is that the data in both languages are strikingly similar. However, although the basic generalization in (1) holds for both German and English, we will see below that trimoraic syllabIes do not have an identical distribution in both languages.
In the present study I make the following theoretical claims. First, I argue that the three environments in (1) have a property in common: they all describe the right edge of a phonological word (or prosodic word; henceforth pword). From a formal point of view, I argue that a constraint I dub the THIRD MORA RESTRICTION (henceforth TMR), which ensures that trimoraic syllables surface at the end of a pword, is active in German and English. According to my proposal trimoraic syllables cannot occur morpheme-internally because monomorphemic grammatical words like garden are parsed as single pwords. Second, I argue that the TMR refers crucially to moraic structure. In particular, underlined strings like the ones in (1) will be shown to be trimoraic; neither skeletal positions nor the subsyllabic constituent rhyme are necessary. Third, the TMR will be shown to be violated in certain (predictable) pword-internal cases, as in Monde and chamber; I account for such facts in an OptimalityTheoretic analysis (henceforth OT; Prince & Smolensky 1993) by ranking various markedness constraints among themselves or by ranking them ahead of the TMR. Fourth, I hold that the TMR describes a concrete level of grammar, which I refer to below as the 'surface' representation. In this respect, my treatment differs significantly from the one proposed for English by Borowsky (1986, 1989), in which the English facts are captured in a Lexical Phonology model by ordering the relevant constraint at level 1 in the lexicon.