Working Paper
Refine
Year of publication
- 2022 (126) (remove)
Document Type
- Working Paper (126) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (126)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (126)
Keywords
- Covid-19 (4)
- Digital Services Act (4)
- ESG (4)
- Digitalisierung (3)
- Mobilität (3)
- climate change (3)
- AI borrower classification (2)
- AI enabled credit scoring (2)
- Artificial Intelligence (2)
- Asset Pricing (2)
- Banking Union (2)
- Big Data (2)
- COVID-19 (2)
- Corona-Pandemie (2)
- DSA (2)
- Desinformation (2)
- Disclosure (2)
- European Central Bank (2)
- European Parliament (2)
- Experiment (2)
- Experten (2)
- FOMC (2)
- FinTech (2)
- Financial Regulation (2)
- Finanzkrise (2)
- Flüchtlinge (2)
- Forschung (2)
- Gesundheit (2)
- Hassrede (2)
- Household Finance (2)
- Klimawandel (2)
- Krise (2)
- Market Liquidity (2)
- Medienberichterstattung (2)
- Nachhaltigkeit (2)
- Performance (2)
- Politikberatung (2)
- Russia (2)
- SWIFT (2)
- Sustainability (2)
- Transparency (2)
- Ukraine (2)
- Wissenschaftskommunikation (2)
- accountability (2)
- brown-spinning (2)
- climate (2)
- credit scoring methodology (2)
- credit scoring regulation (2)
- financial privacy (2)
- institutional investors (2)
- natural gas (2)
- peer effects (2)
- political economy (2)
- politische Reformen (2)
- portfolio management (2)
- price stability (2)
- private companies (2)
- private equity (2)
- responsible lending (2)
- social media (2)
- statistical discrimination (2)
- sustainability (2)
- uncertainty (2)
- 13F filings (1)
- 2-Sector Model (1)
- 401(k) plan (1)
- Accounting (1)
- Acquisitions (1)
- Affordability crisis (1)
- Akzeptanzuntersuchung (1)
- Akzeptierbarkeit (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Art investment (1)
- Art. 17 DSM-Richtlinie (1)
- Asset prices (1)
- Bailin (1)
- Bank Accounting (1)
- Bank's Balance Sheets (1)
- Banks (1)
- Bayesian Estimation (1)
- Behavioral Finance (1)
- Behavioral Measurement (1)
- Beliefs (1)
- Beliefs and Choice (1)
- Bestimmtheit (1)
- Bias in medical research (1)
- Biased Beliefs (1)
- Big Five (1)
- Big Five Personality (1)
- Big Techs (1)
- Big Three (1)
- Big data (1)
- Blockchain (1)
- Broker (1)
- Business Subsidies (1)
- CBDC (1)
- CECL (1)
- Carbon Taxation (1)
- Cash (1)
- Caste (1)
- Causal Machine Learning (1)
- Chihuahuan Desert (1)
- Choice under Risk (1)
- Cholesky decomposition (1)
- Climate Change (1)
- Coalitions (1)
- Colocation (1)
- Complex Financial Instruments (1)
- Consulting (1)
- Consumer Welfare (1)
- Content ID (1)
- Corporate Governance (1)
- Corporate concentration (1)
- Covid pandemic (1)
- Cryptocurrencies (1)
- Cultural Economics (1)
- Cultural Finance (1)
- Cultural Norms (1)
- Customer data sharing (1)
- DMA (1)
- DSGE (1)
- DSGE models (1)
- Data access (1)
- Data portability (1)
- Dienst der Informationsgesellschaft (1)
- Digital Markets Act (1)
- Digital footprints (1)
- Disclosure regulation (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Dyson (1)
- ESM (1)
- Economic and Monetary Union (1)
- Eindeutigkeit (1)
- Empirical Contract Theory (1)
- Energy Embargo (1)
- Enriched Digital Footprint (1)
- Environmental (1)
- Environmental, social, and governance factors (ESG) (1)
- Estimation (1)
- Ethics (1)
- European Banking Union (1)
- European Capital Markets Union (1)
- European Commision (1)
- European Commission (1)
- European Investment Bank (1)
- European Stability Mechanism (1)
- European integration (1)
- Eurozone (1)
- Execution Cost (1)
- Exklusion (1)
- Expected credit losses (1)
- Externalities (1)
- Factor Models (1)
- Fahrradinfrastruktur (1)
- Fiduciary Duties (1)
- FinTech and Textual Analysis (1)
- Financial Markets (1)
- Financial Supervision (1)
- Financial interests (1)
- Fintech (1)
- Fire Sales (1)
- Fixed Income (1)
- Forecasting (1)
- Frankfurt am Main (1)
- Fraud (1)
- Fund family (1)
- Gambling (1)
- Gemeinschaftliches Wohnen (1)
- Gemeinwohl (1)
- Generationenrente (1)
- Generations (1)
- Global Optimization (1)
- Governance (1)
- Green Nudging (1)
- Green Quantitative Easing (1)
- Greenwashing (1)
- Hate Speech (1)
- Haushaltsbefragung (1)
- Headline (1)
- Heterogeneous Agents (1)
- Heterogeneous Firms (1)
- High-Frequency Trading (1)
- High-dimensional Methods (1)
- History & Finance (1)
- Household finance (1)
- IFRS 9 (1)
- IPS (1)
- IV (1)
- IV approach (1)
- Idiosyncratic Risk (1)
- Impairments (1)
- Incomplete Contracts (1)
- Institutional Investor (1)
- Integrated Assessment Model (1)
- Inter-ethnic Conflict (1)
- Invasion (1)
- Klarheit (1)
- Krisenprotokoll (1)
- LBO spillovers (1)
- Lending (1)
- Levola (1)
- Life insurance companies (1)
- Limited Commitment (1)
- Limited Enforcement (1)
- Limits to Arbitrage (1)
- Liquidation Preferences (1)
- Liquidity (1)
- Liquidity Risk (1)
- Loans (1)
- Long-run risk (1)
- Lottery stocks (1)
- Maastricht criteria (1)
- Management (1)
- Marginal Propensity to Consume (1)
- Market Fragmentation (1)
- Market Microstructure (1)
- Market Quality (1)
- Marketplace lending (1)
- Methodenbericht (1)
- MiCA (1)
- Middle East and North Africa (1)
- Mixed-frequency data (1)
- Mobilitätsverhalten (1)
- Model-based regulation (1)
- Monitoring (1)
- Monte Carlo Methods (1)
- Morality (1)
- NFT (1)
- NetzDG (1)
- Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz (1)
- Neuaufteilung öffentlicher Räume (1)
- Non-Compete Agreements (1)
- Non-Fungible Tokens (1)
- Numerical accuracy (1)
- Online Poker (1)
- Online-Plattformen (1)
- Open banking (1)
- Option-implied Risk (1)
- Organizational Economics (1)
- Overblocking (1)
- P2P lending (1)
- Paycheck Protection Program (1)
- Paycheck Sensitivity (1)
- Persistence (1)
- Personnel Economics (1)
- Pivotality (1)
- Plattform (1)
- Policy Center (1)
- Political Economy (1)
- Portfolio optimization (1)
- Price elasticity of gasoline demand (1)
- Pricing Determinants (1)
- Product returns (1)
- Prosociality (1)
- Public Finance (1)
- Random Route (1)
- Random-Route-Verfahren (1)
- Real estate (1)
- Reallocation (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Religion (1)
- Rents (1)
- Research and development (1)
- Retail Challenge (1)
- Retail investors (1)
- Ridepooling (1)
- Risikomanagement (1)
- Risikominderung (1)
- Risk Attitudes (1)
- Risk Preferences (1)
- Risk Sharing (1)
- Robo-Advising (1)
- Russian Sanction (1)
- Rücklaufquote (1)
- SME Trading (1)
- SRB (1)
- SRF (1)
- SVAR (1)
- Sanctions (1)
- Securities Market Regulation (1)
- Short-run and long-run inflation expectations (1)
- Short-time work (1)
- Sieckmann (1)
- Social (1)
- Social Capital (1)
- Social Conditioning (1)
- Social Impact (1)
- Social Learning (1)
- Social Security claiming (1)
- Socially responsible investments (1)
- Solution methods (1)
- Solvency regulation (1)
- Soziale Teilhabe / Partizipation (1)
- Sporthelm (1)
- Stability and Growth Pact (1)
- States (1)
- Stationary Equilibrium (1)
- Subsidization (1)
- Supervision (1)
- Supply Chain (1)
- Survey Data (1)
- Swiss Army Knife (1)
- Temporal aggregation (1)
- Textual Analysis (1)
- Time Inconsistency (1)
- Time Preferences (1)
- Trados (1)
- Transaction Data (1)
- Trust (1)
- Universal banks (1)
- Venture Capital (1)
- Venture capital (1)
- Verhaltenskodex (1)
- Verkehr (1)
- Verkehrspolitik (1)
- Verkehrspolitische Maßnahmen (1)
- Vermittlungsdienst, (1)
- Vernetzung (1)
- Vertrauen (1)
- Volcker Rule (1)
- Wettbewerbsrecht (1)
- Wirksamkeit (1)
- annuity (1)
- art (1)
- asset valuation (1)
- asymmetric information (1)
- auctions (1)
- bail-in (1)
- bank regulation (1)
- bank resolution (1)
- banking (1)
- banking union (1)
- banknotes (1)
- banks (1)
- based on a single specimen (1)
- belief formation (1)
- beliefs (1)
- betting (1)
- biases (1)
- big data (1)
- bitcoin (1)
- blockchain (1)
- bond market liquidity (1)
- bureaucrats' incentives (1)
- business cycle (1)
- capital markets (1)
- capital regulation (1)
- capital requirements (1)
- central bank communication (1)
- civil war (1)
- climate-related disclosures (1)
- coal (1)
- collateral reuse (1)
- common ownership (1)
- computer vision (1)
- computer visionbiases (1)
- concept and conceptions of trust (1)
- conditionality (1)
- conflict (1)
- contentious politics (1)
- continuous limit order book (1)
- core (1)
- credit risk (1)
- creditors runs (1)
- crises (1)
- cross-equation restrictions of rational expectations (1)
- cross-section (1)
- cryptocurrencies (1)
- debt cost (1)
- democracy (1)
- deposit guarantee scheme (1)
- derivatives (1)
- diesel (1)
- digital planning tool (1)
- digitale Geschäftsmodelle (1)
- disagreement (1)
- disaster risk (1)
- discourse analysis (1)
- discrimination (1)
- economic governance (1)
- economies of scale (1)
- electricity (1)
- endogeneity (1)
- energy crisis (1)
- equity cost (1)
- experts (1)
- external instruments (1)
- factorization of matrix polynomials (1)
- filtering (1)
- finance (1)
- finance and development (1)
- finance wage premium (1)
- financial distress (1)
- financial solidarity (1)
- fintech (1)
- fiscal rules (1)
- fiscal solidarity (1)
- frequent batch auctions (1)
- gasoline (1)
- gasoline supply (1)
- gasoline tax (1)
- geistiges Eigentum (1)
- geo-economics (1)
- government bonds (1)
- green financing (1)
- high-frequency trading (1)
- identification (1)
- index funds (1)
- inequality (1)
- inflation (1)
- inflation expectations (1)
- inflation surge (1)
- insider trading (1)
- institutions (1)
- investment behavior (1)
- investment decisions (1)
- investment forum (1)
- investor coalitions (1)
- jet fuel (1)
- justification (1)
- kapitalgedeckte Alterssicherung (1)
- labelling (1)
- latency arbitrage (1)
- leverage constraint (1)
- life expectancy (1)
- liquidity provision (1)
- loanable funds (1)
- longevity (1)
- machine learning (1)
- market design (1)
- market microstructure (1)
- market supervision (1)
- market-making (1)
- monetary policy (1)
- monetary policy rule (1)
- monetary system (1)
- monetary transmission (1)
- money (1)
- money creation (1)
- moral hazar (1)
- motivated reasoning (1)
- national interest (1)
- neoinstitutionalism (1)
- net zero transition (1)
- net-zero transition (1)
- normative orders (1)
- oil (1)
- opinion (1)
- orthogonalization (1)
- ownership disclosure (1)
- pass-through (1)
- passive investors (1)
- pathogenic lichenicolous fungi (1)
- pensions (1)
- persistent or transitory inflation shock (1)
- polarization (1)
- policy reform (1)
- policy rule (1)
- politicization (1)
- profit weights (1)
- property rights (1)
- proprietary trading (1)
- randomized control trial (1)
- randomized controlled trial (1)
- rebel governance (1)
- reconciliation of Lucas's advocacy of rational-expectations modelling and policy predictions and Sims's advocacy of VAR modelling (1)
- recursive utility (1)
- regulation (1)
- rehypothecation (1)
- repo market (1)
- retirement (1)
- retirement expectations (1)
- retirement planning (1)
- risk preference (1)
- safe assets (1)
- saving behavior (1)
- savings banks (1)
- securities lending (1)
- sharing economy (1)
- simultaneity (1)
- skill-biased technological change (1)
- sniping (1)
- social impact (1)
- social movements (1)
- social networks (1)
- sovereign bonds (1)
- sovereign debt (1)
- stabilization (1)
- stock market investment (1)
- structural power (1)
- städtebauliches Instrument (1)
- survey (1)
- survey experiment (1)
- survey forecasts (1)
- sustainability disclosures (1)
- tax arbitrage (1)
- taxes (1)
- trust (1)
- venture capital (1)
- worker-firm panels (1)
Institute
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (99)
- Center for Financial Studies (CFS) (83)
- Sustainable Architecture for Finance in Europe (SAFE) (81)
- House of Finance (HoF) (69)
- Foundation of Law and Finance (24)
- Rechtswissenschaft (21)
- Institute for Monetary and Financial Stability (IMFS) (14)
- Exzellenzcluster Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen (6)
- Geographie (5)
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (4)
The European Central Bank (ECB) recently proclaimed a more active role for itself in the fight against climate change. Did the European Parliament (EP) play a part in this regard, and if so what was it? To answer this question, this paper builds on a multi-method text analysis of original datasets compiling communications between the ECB and the EP across three accountability forums between 2014 and 2021. The paper shows that there has been discursive convergence between central bankers and parliamentarians concerning the role of the ECB in combatting climate change. It argues that this convergence has resulted from a pragmatic (yet precarious) adoption of a common repertoire1 between ‘green’ central bankers and parliamentarians who have favored a more active role for the ECB in the fight against climate change. The adoption of a common repertoire is pragmatic, in that it results from the strategic use of specific discursive elements that are ambitious enough to address their respective opponents and trigger political change, yet vague enough to allow both sets of actors to converge on them momentarily. It is also precarious in the sense that it involves discarding fundamental political tensions, which is hardly tenable in the long term. The paper shows that both organizational and politicization dynamics have been at work in the emergence of this pragmatic yet precarious bedfellowship between ‘green’ central bankers and parliamentarians.
This briefing paper describes and evaluates the law and economics of institution(al) protection schemes. Throughout our analysis, we use Europe’s largest such scheme, that of German savings banks, as paradigm. We find strengths and weaknesses: Strong network-internal monitoring and early warning seems to be an important contributor to IPS network success. Similarly, the geographical quasi-cartel encourages banks to build a strong client base, including SME, in all regions. Third, the growth of the IPS member institutions may have benefitted from the strictly unlimited protection offered, in terms of euro amounts per account holder. The counterweighing weaknesses encompass the conditionality of the protection pledge and the underinvestment risk it entails, sometimes referred to as blackmailing the government, as well as the limited diversification potential of the deposit insurance within the network, and the near-incompatibility of the IPS model with the provisions of the BRRD, particularly relating to bail-in and resolution. Consequently, we suggest, as policy guidance, to treat large IPS networks similar to large banking groups, and put them as such under the direct supervision of the ECB within the SSM. Moreover, we suggest strengthening the seriousness of a deposit insurance that offers unlimited protection. Finally, to improve financial stability, we suggest embedding the IPS model into a multi-tier deposit re-insurance scheme, with a national and a European layer. This document was provided by the Economic Governance Support Unit at the request of the ECON Committee.
This paper studies the interactions between corporate law and VC exits by acquisitions, an increasingly common source of VC-related litigation. We find that transactions by VC funds under liquidity pressure are characterized by (i) a substantially lower sale price; (ii) a greater probability of industry outsiders as acquirers; (iii) a positive abnormal return for acquirers. These features indicate the existence of fire sales, which satisfy VCs' liquidation preferences but hurt common shareholders, leaving board members with conflicting fiduciary duties and litigation risks. Exploiting an important court ruling that establishes the board’s fiduciary duties to common shareholders as a priority, we find that after the ruling maturing VCs become less likely to exit by fire sales and they distribute cash to their investors less timely. However, VCs experience more difficult fundraising ex-ante, highlighting the potential cost of a common-favoring regime. Overall the evidence has important implications for optimal fiduciary duty design in VC-backed start-ups.
We estimate the cost of cultural biases in high-stake economic decisions by comparing agents’ peer-to-peer lending choices with those the same agents make under the assistance of an automated robo-advisor. We first confirm substantial in-group vs. out-group and stereotypical discrimination, which are stronger for lenders who reside where historical cultural biases are higher. We then exploit our unique setting to document that cultural biases are costly: agents face 8% higher default rates on favored-group borrowers when unassisted. The returns they earn on favored groups increase by 7.3 percentage points when assisted. The high riskiness of the marginal borrowers from favorite groups largely explains the bad performance of culturally-biased choices. Because varying economic incentives do not reduce agents’ biases, inaccurate statistical discrimination—unconscious biased beliefs about borrowers’ quality—can explain our results better than taste-based discrimination.
Prospective welfare analysis - extending willingness-to-pay assessment to embrace sustainability
(2022)
In this paper we outline how a future change in consumers’ willingness-to-pay can be accounted for in a consumer welfare effects analysis in antitrust. Key to our solution is the prediction of preferences of new consumers and changing preferences of existing consumers in the future. The dimension of time is inextricably linked with that of sustainability. Taking into account the welfare of future cohorts of consumers, concerns for sustainability can therefore be integrated into the consumer welfare paradigm to a greater extent. As we argue in this paper, it is expedient to consider changes in consumers’ willingness-to-pay, in particular if society undergoes profound changes in such preferences, e.g., caused by an increase in generally available information on environmental effects of consumption, and a rising societal awareness about how consumption can have irreversible impacts on the environment. We offer suggestions on how to conceptionalize and operationalize the projection of such consumers’ changing preferences in a “prospective welfare analysis”. This increases the scope of the consumer welfare paradigm and can help to solve conceptual issues regarding the integration of sustainability into antitrust enforcement while keeping consumer surplus as a quantitative gauge.
Since the 2008 financial crisis, European largest banks’ size and business models have largely remained unchallenged. Is that because of banks’ continued structural power over States? This paper challenges the view that States are sheer hostages of banks’ capacity to provide credit to the real economy – which is the conventional definition of structural power. Instead, it sheds light on the geo-economic dimension of banks’ power: key public officials conceive the position of “their own” market-based banks in global financial markets as a crucial dimension of State power. State priority towards banking thus result from political choices over what structurally matters the most for the State. Based on a discourse analysis of parliamentary debates in France, Germany and Spain between 2010 and 2020 as well as on a comparative analysis of the implementation of a special tax on banks in the early 2010s, this paper shows that State’s Finance ministries tend to prioritize geo-economic considerations over credit to firms. By contrast, Parliaments tend to prioritize investment. Power dynamics within the State thus largely shape political priorities towards banking at the domestic and international levels.
We provide the first comprehensive analysis of option information for pricing the cross-section of stock returns by jointly examining extensive sets of firm and option characteristics. Using portfolio sorts and high-dimensional methods, we show that certain option measures have significant predictive power, even after controlling for firm characteristics, earning a Fama-French three-factor alpha in excess of 20% per annum. Our analysis further reveals that the strongest option characteristics are associated with information about asset mispricing and future tail return realizations. Our findings are consistent with models of informed trading and limits to arbitrage.
The transition to a sustainable economy currently involves a fundamental transformation of our capital markets. Lawmakers, in an attempt to overcome this challenge, frequently seek to prescribe and regulate how firms may address environmental, social, and governance (ESG) concerns by formulating conduct standards. Deviating from this conceptual starting point, the present paper makes the case for another path towards achieving greater sustainability in capital markets, namely through the empowerment of investors.
This trust in the market itself is grounded in various recent developments both on the supply side and the demand side of financial markets, and also in the increasing tendency of institutional investors to engage in common ownership. The need to build coalitions among different types of asset managers or institutional investors, and to convince fellow investors of a given initiative, can then act as an in-built filter helping to overcome the pursuit of idiosyncratic motives and supporting only those campaigns that are seconded by a majority of investors. In particular, institutionalized investor platforms have emerged over recent years as a force for investor empowerment, serving to coordinate investor campaigns and to share the costs of engagement.
ESG engagement has the potential to become a very powerful driver towards a more sustainability-oriented future. Indeed, I show that investor-led sustainability has many advantages compared to a more prescriptive, regulatory approach where legislatures are in the driver’s seat. For example, a focus on investor-led priorities would follow a more flexible and dynamic pattern rather than complying with inflexible pre-defined criteria. Moreover, investor-promoted assessments are not likely to impair welfare creation in the same way as ill-defined legal standards; they will also not trigger regulatory arbitrage and would avoid deadlock situations in corporate decision-making. Any regulatory activity should then be limited to a facilitative and supportive role.
Trust between parties should drive contract design: if parties were suspicious about each others’ reaction to unplanned events, they might agree to pay higher costs of negotiation ex ante to complete contracts. Using a unique sample of U.S. consulting contracts and a negative shock to trust between shareholders/managers (principals) and consultants (agents) staggered across space and over time, we find that lower trust increases contract completeness. Not only the complexity but also the verifiable states of the world covered by contracts increase after trust drops. The results hold for several novel text-analysis-based measures of contract completeness and do not arise in falsification tests. At the clause level, we find that non-compete agreements, confidentiality, indemnification, and termination rules are the most likely clauses added to contracts after a negative shock to trust and these additions are not driven by new boilerplate contract templates. These clauses are those whose presence should be sensitive to the mutual trust between principals and agents.
The article studies civil wars and trust dynamics from two perspectives. It looks, first, at rebel governance during ongoing armed conflict and, second, at mass mobilisation against the regime in post-conflict societies. Both contexts are marked by extraordinarily high degrees of uncertainty given continued, or collective memory of, violence and repression.
But what happens to trust relations under conditions of extreme uncertainty? Intuitively, one would assume that trust is shaken or even substantially eroded in such moments, as political and social orders are questioned on a fundamental level and threaten to collapse. However, while it is true that some forms of trust are under assault in situations of civil war and mass protests, we find empirical evidence which suggests that these situations also give rise to the formation of other kinds of trust. We argue that, in order to detect and explain these trust dynamics in contexts of extreme uncertainty, there should be more systematic studies of: (a) synchronous dynamics between different actors and institutions which imply trust dynamics happening simultaneously, (b) diachronous dynamics and the sequencing of trust dynamics over several phases of violent conflict or episodes of contention, as well as long-term structural legacies of the past. In both dimensions, microlevel relations, as well as their embeddedness in larger structures, help explain how episodes of (non-)violent contention become a critical juncture for political and social trust.