170 search hits
-
"Da li, je li i li" : normativni status i raspodjela
(2007)
-
Lana Hudeček
Luka Vukojević
- U radu se daje pregled problema povezanih s normativnim statusom čestičnih/vezničkih skupina da li, je li i čestice/veznika li. Pokazuje se da postoji nekoliko pogrješaka povezanih s tumačenjem normativnog statusa i raspodjele tih skupina i te čestice te se provjerava normativno pravilo prema kojemu skupinu da li treba u standardnome jeziku zamijeniti česticom li (o tome se posve pogrješno često piše kao o zamjeni da li s je li, a skupina je li, s iznimkom skupine je li da koja ima funkciju dopunskoga pitanja, u standardnome jeziku ne postoji kao čestična/veznička skupina jer je njezin prvi član uvijek 3. lice prezenta glagola biti). Određuje se normativni status skupine je li, tj. pokazuje se da je ona u hrvatskome jeziku ili zastarjela ili da pripada razgovornomu stilu. Također se provjeravaju pravila u skladu s kojima se normativni status skupine da li u izravnome pitanju razlikuje od njezina statusa u neizravnome pitanju i prema kojima se skupina da li i u standardnome jeziku pojavljuje pri izricanju potvrdnosti te u alternativnim pitanjima. Donose se uvjeti zamjenjivosti skupina da li česticom/veznikom li, tj. izdvajaju se sintaktički konteksti u kojima ta zamjena nije potrebna ili nije moguća.
-
"Hot pants", "cold fish" and "cool customers" : in search of historical metaphorical extensions in the realm of temperature terms
(2007)
-
Grzegorz A. Kleparski
-
"Low wenches" and "slatternly queans" : on derogation of women terms
(2007)
-
Bożena Kochman-Haładyj
-
"The trumpet put me in a bad mood" : some remarks on the mechanism of metonymy in current linguistic analysis
(2007)
-
Grzegorz A. Kleparski
Beata Kopecka
-
"Tomcat", "kocur" and "kotjara" : in search of metaphorical extensions in the field "cats" in English, Polish and Russian
(2007)
-
Artur Czapiga
Grzegorz A. Kleparski
-
A declarative characterization of different types of multicomponent tree adjoining grammars
(2007)
-
Laura Kallmeyer
- Multicomponent Tree Adjoining Grammars (MCTAG) is a formalism that has been shown to be useful for many natural language applications. The definition of MCTAG however is problematic since it refers to the process of the derivation itself: a simultaneity constraint must be respected concerning the way the members of the elementary tree sets are added. This way of characterizing MCTAG does not allow to abstract away from the concrete order of derivation. In this paper, we propose an alternative definition of MCTAG that characterizes the trees in the tree language of an MCTAG via the properties of the derivation trees (in the underlying TAG) the MCTAG licences. This definition gives a better understanding of the formalism, it allows a more systematic comparison of different types of MCTAG, and, furthermore, it can be exploited for parsing.
-
A mission for grammar writing : early approaches to Inuit (Eskimo) languages
(2007)
-
Elke Nowak
- The Inuit inhabit a vast area of--from a European point of view--most inhospitable land, stretching from the northeastern tip of Asia to the east coast of Greenland. Inuit peoples have never been numerous, their settlements being scattered over enormous distances. But nevertheless, from an ethnological point of view, all Inuit peoples shared a distinct culture, featuring sea mammal and caribou hunting, sophisticated survival skills, technical and social devices, including the sharing of essential goods and strategies for minimizing and controlling aggression.
-
A note on pragmatically and stylistically conditioned semantic changes : the case study of "Newsweek" Polska
(2007)
-
Grzegorz A. Kleparski
Marta Pikor-Niedziałek
-
A note on synonymy : synchronic and diachronic
(2007)
-
Grzegorz A. Kleparski
Paulina Borkowska
-
Absolute and statistical universals
(2007)
-
Balthasar Bickel
- Language universals are statements that are true of all languages, for example: “all languages have stop consonants”. But beneath this simple definition lurks deep ambiguity, and this triggers misunderstanding in both interdisciplinary discourse and within linguistics itself. A core dimension of the ambiguity is captured by the opposition “absolute vs. statistical universal”, although the literature uses these terms in varied ways. Many textbooks draw the boundary between absolute and statistical according to whether a sample of languages contains exceptions to a universal. But the notion of an exception-free sample is not very revealing even if the sample contained all known languages: there is always a chance that an as yet undescribed language, or an unknown language from the past or future, will provide an exception.
