Linguistik
Refine
Year of publication
- 2007 (211) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (100)
- Part of a Book (54)
- Preprint (12)
- Conference Proceeding (11)
- Review (11)
- Report (9)
- Working Paper (8)
- Book (4)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Part of Periodical (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (211)
Keywords
- Kroatisch (35)
- Deutsch (18)
- Rezensionen (17)
- Referenzidentität (11)
- Englisch (10)
- Phraseologie (7)
- Spracherwerb (7)
- focus (7)
- Bedeutungswandel (6)
- Referenz <Linguistik> (6)
Institute
Morphology
(2007)
In anaphora resolution theory, it has been assumed that anaphora resolution is based on a reversed mapping of antecedent salience and anaphora complexity: minimal complex anaphora refer to maximal salient antecedents. In order to ex-amine whether and by which developmental steps German children gain command of this mapping maxim we conducted an experiment on production and comprehension of intersentential pronouns including the three pronoun types zero, personal, and demonstrative pronoun. With respect to antecedent salience, the experiment varied syntactic role (subject/object) and in/animacy. Six age groups of children (age range from 2;0 to 6;0) and an adult control group has been tested. The hypothesis arising from the mapping maxim is that zero pronoun correlates with more salient antecedents than personal and demonstrative pronoun, the latter correlating with the least salient antecedents. The results are: In production, children first establish the opposition of zero pronoun with animate antecedents vs. demonstrative pronoun with inanimate antecedents. In a next step, syntactic role comes into play and a more complex system opposing the three presented pronoun types is established. In comprehension, however, the effect of pronoun type re-mains weak and antecedent features remain a strong factor in reference choice. However, also adults employ pronoun type and antecedent features. The oldest children and the adults show variation in personal pronoun resolution according to the animacy pattern of the potential antecedents. In case of identical animacy features, the subject is the preferred candidate; in case of distinct animacy features, there is a tendency to choose the object antecedent.
Romance suffix rivalry of action nouns from Middle English verbs in the OED textual prototypes
(2007)
Semantic form as interface
(2007)
The term interface had a remarkable career over the past several decades, motivated largely by its use in computer science. Although the concept of a "surface common to two areas" (Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary, 1980) is intuitively clear enough, the range of its application is not very sharp and well defined, a "common surface" is open to a wide range of interpretations.
Language universals are statements that are true of all languages, for example: “all languages have stop consonants”. But beneath this simple definition lurks deep ambiguity, and this triggers misunderstanding in both interdisciplinary discourse and within linguistics itself. A core dimension of the ambiguity is captured by the opposition “absolute vs. statistical universal”, although the literature uses these terms in varied ways. Many textbooks draw the boundary between absolute and statistical according to whether a sample of languages contains exceptions to a universal. But the notion of an exception-free sample is not very revealing even if the sample contained all known languages: there is always a chance that an as yet undescribed language, or an unknown language from the past or future, will provide an exception.
Traditionally, the term "grammatical relation" (GR) refers to the morphosyntactic properties that relate an argument to a clause, as, for example, its subject or its object. Alternative terms are "syntactic function" or "syntactic role", and they highlight the fact that GRs are defined by the way in which arguments are integrated syntactically into a clause, i.e. by functioning as subject, object etc. Whatever terminology one prefers, what is crucial about the traditional notion of GRs is (a) that they are identified by syntactic properties, and (b) that they relate an argument to the clause.
Der folgende unterrichtspraktische Beitrag ist die Fortsetzung eines bereits erschienenen Aufsatzes zur Phraseologismenvermittlung im DaF-Unterricht (vgl. Bergerová 2005). Während es dort im Wesentlichen um grundlegende theoretische Fragestellungen der Phraseodidaktik ging, behandelt der vorliegende Beitrag die Umsetzung der neuesten Erkenntnisse der phraseodidaktischen Forschung am Beispiel eines Didaktisierungsvorschlages anhand der Textsorte Filmankündigung. Vorangestellt wird dafür zunächst eine instruktive Einleitung zu ausgewählten Fragen der Phraseologie im Allgemeinen und der Phraseodidaktik im Besonderen, um auf dieser Grundlage den Didaktisierungsvorschlag entwerfen und erklären zu können.
Die vorliegende Arbeit ist eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit dem Hofstedeschen Ansatz. Dabei soll in erster Linie das Werk von Hofstede selbst einer wissenschaftstheoretisch-methodologischen Prüfung unterzogen werden. Bei sehr populären Standardansätzen, die sowohl in der Praxis einen großen Anklang finden als auch in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft ständig rezipiert und weiterentwickelt werden, bleibt es natürlich nicht aus, dass durch Vereinfachungen oder Uminterpretationen in der Literatur Inkonsistenzen entstehen, die so im Originalwerk nicht enthalten sind. In dieser Arbeit soll es im Wesentlichen nicht um solche Probleme der Hofstedeschen Rezeption gehen. Vielmehr werde ich die Argumentation von Hofstede selbst in seinen eigenen Schriften […] einer detaillierten kritischen Analyse zu unterziehen, um auf diese Weise zu prüfen, ob bestimmte gravierende Probleme schon im Originalwerk angelegt sind.