Linguistik-Klassifikation
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (194)
- Article (93)
- Working Paper (75)
- Conference Proceeding (10)
- Review (6)
- Report (3)
- Book (1)
- Other (1)
- Preprint (1)
Language
- English (285)
- German (83)
- Portuguese (10)
- Croatian (5)
- Turkish (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (384)
Keywords
- Semantik (71)
- Englisch (51)
- Deutsch (50)
- Syntax (42)
- Formale Semantik (29)
- Metapher (29)
- Bedeutungswandel (18)
- Informationsstruktur (14)
- Lexikologie (12)
- Pragmatik (12)
Institute
"Je suis Charlie" was used over 619.000 times in the two days that have followed the attack of the editorial team of Charlie Hebdo (Le Progrès, The Huffington Post) and has regularly been taken up in both written and spoken form since. In this paper, we argue that the structure of this sentence actually clashes with its meaning. More specifically, whereas its word order and default rightmost sentence stress are compatible either with an all-focus reading or a narrow focusing of Charlie, the context of use of this sentence as well as the solidarity/empathy message it intends to communicate suggest that its subject is narrowly focused. We will propose that two strategies have emerged to solve this conflict: (i) various alternative forms have appeared that allow proper subject focusing and (ii) speakers have reinterpreted the structure so as to pragmatically retrieve the (additive) focused nature of the subject.
Modifiability by almost has been used as a test for the quantificational force of a DP without stating the meaning of almost explicitly. The aim of this paper is to give a semantics for almost applying across categories and to evaluate the validity of the almost test as a diagnosis for universal quantifiers. It is argued that almost is similar to other cross-categorial modifiers such as at least or exactly in referring to alternatives ordered on a scale. I propose that almost evaluates alternatives in which the modified expression is replaced by a value close by on the corresponding Horn scale. It is shown that a semantics for almost that refers to scalar alternatives derives the correct truth conditions for almost and explains selectional restrictions. At the same time, taking the semantics of almost seriously invalidates the almost test as a simple diagnosis for the nature of quantifiers.
Depiction verbs such as paint license i(mage)- and p(ortrait)-readings; for instance, Ben painted a cow can convey that Ben produced an image of an unspecific cow or a portrait of a specific cow. This paper takes issue with a property-based intensional analysis of depiction verbs (Zimmermann, 2006b, 2016) and instead argues for an extensional account. Accordingly, the i-reading is rooted in the introduction of worldly representations by the explicit noun cow as such, whereas the p-reading is rooted in the interpolation of an implicit representation via coercion. This take on the ambiguity captures the following key traits. On i-readings, only representations are accessible to quantifiers and anaphors; moreover, intensional effects such as substitution failure disappear once ordinary objects and representations are adequately distinguished. P-readings, by contrast, involve representations that depend on the portrayed ordinary objects as particulars; correspondingly, only ordinary objects are accessible to quantifiers and anaphors. The proposal is spelled out in Asher’s (2011) Type Composition Logic.
This paper focuses on definite descriptions. It will be shown that a definite description refers to a given discourse referent if the descriptive content is completely deaccented. But if there is a focussed element within the descriptive content it introduces a novel referent. This amounts to allowing two readings for definite descriptions without, however, allowing two readings for the definite article.
Rezension zu Elke Hentschel, Negation und Interrogation. Studien zur Universalität ihrer Funktion. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag 1998 (Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 195, ix + 250 S., 112,00 DM, ISBN 3-484-31195-9)
Die vorliegende Studie von Christine Konecny ist ein umfassendes Sammelwerk, das die internationalen Tendenzen in der Betrachtung von Kollokationen ausführlich erfasst. Der Titel und der Untertitel weisen eindeutig auf die theoretische und analytische Ausrichtung der Arbeit hin. Im ersten Teil werden die Kollokationen linguistisch betrachtet, es werden Auffassungs-, Definitions- und Abgrenzungsprobleme von Kollokationen detailliert geschildert. Eine Schlüsselkomponente im Titel ist jedoch nicht nur das Wort Kollokationen, das das Thema der Studie benennt. Aussagekräftiger ist der Untertitel, konkret sind es die Wörter Versuch und Annäherung. Die Studie ist der Versuch, einerseits die Position der Kollokationen sowohl in der Systemlinguistik als auch auf der Supraebene zu beschreiben, andererseits die Kollokationen nach unterschiedlichen sprachwissenschaftlichen Gesichtspunkten – vor allem unter phraseologischen, korpuslinguistischen, systemlinguistischen, pragmalinguistischen Aspekten - sowie aus der Sicht der kognitiven Psycholinguistik, Fremdsprachendidaktik, Wortbildungslehre, Lexikographie, kontrastiven und konfrontativen Linguistik und Translatologie zu bestimmen. Ein weiterer Versuch betrifft die Abgrenzung und Klassifikation der Kollokationen. Die Autorin hat sich u. a. zum Ziel gesetzt, Kollokationen von festen, teil- und nicht idiomatischen Wortverbindungen zu unterscheiden und sie anhand unterschiedlicher Klassifizierungskriterien hauptsächlich nach syntaktisch-morphologischen und semantisch-begrifflichen Unterscheidungsmerkmalen zu kategorisieren.