Open Access

Andreas Schaich

• Faces are thought to be processed primarily according to their configurations which is in-ferred from comparisons with non-facial stimuli. While the whole (face) seems to be more than the sum of its parts, the same does not apply to objects which are processed analytically according to their featural information. A recent recognition model stresses the importance of certain visual information within facial stimuli. By applying a specific filtering technique, stimuli can be generated that are restricted to contain information of only a certain orienta-tion. Dakin and Watt (2009) reported greatest recognition performance with faces that only contained horizontally aligned information with accuracy continuously declining at vertical. Furthermore, they showed that, compared with images of natural scenes, horizontal contours within faces have an unusual tendency to fall into vertically co-aligned clusters which were labelled biological ‘bar code’ referring to a highly constrained one-dimensional code. Con-secutive research tested for face-specific processing by comparing faces and objects that displayed information of different orientations. Results suggested configural processing only for faces that contained horizontal information (Goffaux & Dakin, 2010). The findings con-tribute important insight on a still unanswered question in face processing research: what information is extracted from faces for recognizing them. Despite the importance of remembering human faces on a daily basis, this ability seems to develop disadvantageously over lifetime. Decreased accuracy cannot be attributed to de-creased general cognitive ability (Hildebrandt, Wilhelm, Schmiedek, Herzmann, & Sommer, 2011) and slower reactions times are assumed to be a product of decision making rather than sensory speed (Habak, Wilkinson, & Wilson, 2008). Considering the amount of published work on face recognition, there is a lack of studies available assessing this important ability at a higher age. New theoretical concepts are rarely examined with older participants, appar-ently assuming their general validity. The current dissertation tries to help fill this gap by assessing the importance of horizontal information from a developmental perspective com-paring younger and older adults under different experimental variations. The first study showed, that presenting older participants with horizontally filtered faces has a dispropor-tional negative impact on recognizing younger unfamiliar faces suggesting differential pro-cessing mechanisms, since recognizing stimuli that only contained vertical information did not differ between age groups. On this basis, the following study manipulated the presented stimulus material, since some evidence suggests that own-age faces are more easily recog-nized compared to faces of other ages, which is referred to as “own-age bias”. Therefore, the second study systematically assessed the impact of stimulus age on recognition sensitivity. Moreover, encoding modalities were varied by providing increased exposure duration to the stimuli. The results of the first study were replicated, as older participants’ performance was still poor at recognizing younger faces, independent from encoding modalities. However, similar face recognition sensitivity compared to younger adults was observable when filtered faces of the older adults’ own age had to be recognized. Interestingly, correlations between recognizing filtered and unfiltered faces were obtained for younger adults but not for older adults suggesting age variant processing of horizontal information. The last study assessed the importance of horizontal information with stimulus material familiar to the observer. Although research highlights differences between recognizing unfamiliar and familiar stimu-lus material, this factor is often not considered by contemporary research. By presenting par-ticipants with their own faces, a stimulus of greatest individual familiarity was chosen. The superiority of own face recognition over other familiar material is referred to as “self-face advantage” and has been shown in comparison with personally familiar faces (Keyes & Brady, 2010) and famous faces (Caharel et al., 2002). While younger adults indeed recog-nized their self-faces better compared to famous faces independent from stimuli being fil-tered or unfiltered, older participants displayed a completely different pattern including the inability to recognize their filtered self-faces. Again, significant associations were obtained between filtered and unfiltered recognition conditions suggesting convergent processing mechanisms for younger adults but not for the older age group. This dissertation provides a first insight in the divergence of response behavior in older adults with a recent face processing model. While the obtained data undermine the im-portance of horizontal information in younger adults by replicating and extending previously published work, a profoundly different type of processing is suggested at a higher age which largely relies on low-level pictorial information due to the inability to process horizontally filtered faces configurally. Specifically, it is suggested that with age, focusing on aging-salient features with configural processing disrupted may function as a critical source of di-agnostic information which can ultimately result in performance similar to younger adults.