Translating Weimar. Introductory remarks
- The 100th anniversary of the Weimar Constitution’s promulgation has brought a number of new stimuli to a historiography that has for a long time focused largely on the Weimar Republic’s failure. Two prominent recent publications – Udo Di Fabio’s study and a collective volume edited by Horst Dreier und Christian Waldhoff – are reviewed in this issue by the Brazilian constitutional historian Marcelo Neves. His review and the last months’ public debate on the merits and flaws of the Weimar Constitution in Germany, which was framed by current concerns about the state of Western democracies, show to what extent constitutional history is always also a conversation about the present. ...
Author: | Thomas DuveORCiDGND, Fupeng Li |
---|---|
URN: | urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-511059 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.12946/rg27/174-175 |
ISSN: | 2195-9617 |
ISSN: | 1619-4993 |
Parent Title (Multiple languages): | Rechtsgeschichte = Legal history |
Publisher: | Max-Planck-Inst. für Europäische Rechtsgeschichte |
Place of publication: | Frankfurt, M. |
Contributor(s): | Stefan Vogenauer |
Document Type: | Article |
Language: | English |
Year of Completion: | 2019 |
Year of first Publication: | 2019 |
Publishing Institution: | Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg |
Release Date: | 2019/10/07 |
Volume: | 27 |
Page Number: | 3 |
First Page: | 174 |
Last Page: | 175 |
Note: | Dieser Beitrag steht unter einer Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License |
HeBIS-PPN: | 455470219 |
Institutes: | Rechtswissenschaft / Rechtswissenschaft |
Dewey Decimal Classification: | 3 Sozialwissenschaften / 34 Recht / 340 Recht |
Sammlungen: | Universitätspublikationen |
Licence (German): | Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 |