Open Access

Mauro Panigada, Gianluigi Li Bassi, Otavio T. Ranzani, Theodor Kolobow, Alberto Zanella, Massimo Cressoni, Lorenzo Berra, Vieri Parrini, Hassan Kandil, Giovanni Salati, Sergio Livigni, Alessandro Amatu, Andreotti Andreotti, Fernanda Tagliaferri, Gabriella Moise, Giovanna Mercurio, Antonietta Costa, Antonella Vezzani, Simone Lindau, Jaksa Babel, Marco Cavana, Dario Consonni, Antonio Pesenti, Luciano Gattinoni, Antoni Torres

• Introduction: Gravity plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (1). In previous laboratory studies (2) the semi-lateral Trendelenburg position (LTP) hindered gravity-driven pulmonary aspiration and avoided VAP. Objectives: To determine whether the LTP vs. the semi-recumbent position (SRP) would reduce the incidence of microbiologically confirmed VAP and to appraise patient's compliance and safety. Methods: We conducted a randomized, single-blind, controlled study in 17 European centers and 1 in North America. A total of 2019 adult patients were screened between 2010 and 2015. 395 patients were randomized - 194 in LTP and 201 in SRP - and analyzed in an intention to treat approach. Patients in LTP were placed in semi-lateral (60°) - Trendelenburg position to achieve an orientation, from the sternal notch toward the mouth, slightly below horizontal, and turned from one side to the other every 6 hours. LTP was encouraged during the first days of mechanical ventilation, but always in compliance with the patient's wish. In the SRP group, the head of the bed was elevated ≥ 30°. Primary outcome was VAP incidence rate, based on quantitative bronchoalveolar lavage fluid culture with ≥ 104 colonyforming units/mL. Secondary outcomes were compliance to the randomized position, length of intubation, duration of intensive care unit and hospital stay, mortality, and adverse events. Results: The trial was stopped after the planned interim analysis for achieving efficacy endpoints and owing to safety concerns. Patients in the LTP and SRP group were kept in the randomized position for 38 % and 90 % of the study time, respectively (p = 0.001). Yet, during the first 48 hours, LTP patients were kept in the randomized position for 50 % of the study time, and SRP patients for 88 % (p = 0.001). In the LTP, the bed was angulated 5.6° in Trendelenburg; while, the head of the bed was elevated 34.1° in the SRP group. Incidence rates of microbiologically confirmed VAP were 0.88 (1/1136 patient-days; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.12-6.25) in the LTP group, and 7.19 (8/1113 patient-days; CI 95 %, 3.60-14.37) in the SRP (p = 0.020), relative risk reduction of 0.12 (95 % CI, 0.01-0.91). No statistically significant differences were observed in durations of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit and hospital stay, and mortality. Vomiting was more common in LTP patients (8.3 % vs. 2.5 % in the SRP, p = 0.013). Conclusions: Critically ill patients positioned in the LTP had a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of VAP, compared with those positioned in the SRP. A comprehensive evaluation of potential LTP contraindications is warranted to enhance safety.