CompaRe | Allgemeine und Vergleichende Literaturwissenschaft
Refine
Year of publication
- 2011 (238) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (103)
- Article (79)
- Review (19)
- Conference Proceeding (15)
- Report (8)
- Book (7)
- Part of Periodical (3)
- Working Paper (3)
- Periodical (1)
Language
- German (191)
- English (37)
- Portuguese (9)
- Spanish (1)
Keywords
- Literatur (31)
- Rezeption (27)
- Benjamin, Walter (23)
- Dante Alighieri (20)
- Productive reception (18)
- Psychoanalyse (18)
- Freud, Sigmund (17)
- Rezension (17)
- Das Unheimliche (16)
- Überleben (15)
Institute
- Extern (10)
- Neuere Philologien (1)
Is there something like a 'scientific' approach to the reading or interpretation of literary texts as is suggested by the German term 'Literaturwissenschaft'? This essay argues that genuinely scientific criteria such as the intersubjective verifiability of a given reading do not apply to the reading of literary texts. The reason is that such texts enable a quasi infinite range of different readings the preconceptions of which are contingent upon the individual readers, their previous experiences, literary as well as non-literary, and their expectations. — What, then, are the tasks of a scholarly reading of literary texts? Firstly, the theoretical reflection upon the status of such texts in comparison to pragmatic texts; secondly, the attempt at reconstructing their historical context (in terms of discursive history), and thirdly, a reading with regard to present-day problems. The 'quality' of a scholarly reading of a literary text would thus be dependent not on its 'objectivity', but rather on its capacity to produce resonances amongst other present-day readers, scholarly and non-scholarly.
This paper seeks to demonstrate the ways in which Bachmann's work constitutes a prime case for examining the scope and the boundaries of philological research. It does so by focusing on Bachmann‘s fragmentary and unfinished novel, "Das Buch Franza" [1965-1966], exploring the text and its author in an interdisciplinary light. Forming part of Bachmann's uncompleted "Todesarten"-Projekt, "Das Buch Franza" deals with the continuing legacy of fascism and its displaced forms in the post-war era. In its thematisation of the traumatic and necessarily belated after-effects of the Second World War and the Holocaust, Bachmann‘s text draws on various disciplines and discourses, namely geology, archaeology and psychoanalysis. I consider the ways in which the interdisciplinary ambitions of the text reflect Bachmann‘s struggle for a new form of representation, one that adequately mirrors the concerns of her society. Finally, drawing on Bachmann‘s own theoretical reflections on the field of literary study in her Frankfurt Lectures on poetics, I trace the ways in which the author's work repeatedly encourages us to adopt multiple disciplinary perspectives, as well as privileging literature with a utopian function that exceeds any generic or disciplinary boundaries.
In works of Maghrebi authors like Tahar Ben Jelloun (Morocco), the body is the central medium that generates and constitutes the narration. The authors stand in the tradition of oral folk literature, which increasingly has been displaced by French written literature. Hence there is a tendency in postcolonial Maghrebi texts to reintegrate the performative act of narrating via the body into the literary structures of the novels. This becomes manifest in poly-phonic and poly-perspectival narrative experiments in which, with recourse to the halqa (the typical oral narrative situation), a re-territorialization (Deleuze/Guattari) of the body is performed.
In this context the body in literature plays a central role on the level of the metadiegesis: it is presented as the medium of narration. Using as an example Tahar Ben Jellouns novel L’enfant de sable (1985), the aim of this essay is to show how halqa elements and narrative influences from The Arabian Nights structure the text, which becomes a hybrid between medium and embodiment (Fischer-Lichte) by simulating eventfulness.
On the level of the diegesis, the body plays likewise a decisive role as subject of the storyline, becoming the most important medium for the expression of emotions, thoughts or attitudes. Body language is deliberately utilized by the authors to discuss ways of dealing with traditions, the negotiation of social relations and the (de-)construction of identity. Social order, power structures, hierarchies, existing values and norms are communicated and constituted via body language.
The conference paper interprets Spinoza's concept of “sola scriptura” as a reductio ad absurdum of historicalcritical approaches to text interpretation. It shows that despite Spinoza's emphasis on the revelatory function of scripture and despite his claim that there is only one method of reading it, he intently and distinctly undermines this very hermeneutics as unreliable and incompatible with both reason and truth. The text follows the central intuition that for Spinoza, this insuffiency of hermeneutics accounts for its political potential, as a means of uncoupling politics and theology.
Based on the metaphor of “liminality” in literary studies, this paper examines two different approaches to the literary genre of travelogues, using the example of Adelbert von Chamisso‟s Voyage Around the World (1836). One approach, with the help of autobiographical research, sheds light on the author-specific key motifs of “omnipotent time” and the process of aging. In the second approach, the focus shifts to the relationship between literature and natural science, i.e. to Chamisso‟s transitional position in the context of the historicization and dynamization of the sciences and humanities in the 19th century. Rather than thinking of “philology” and “cultural studies” as opposing methods, this article thus suggests a more in-tercessory position for the purpose of a fruitful study of travel literature.
This paper examines the well-known practice of developing a conceptual frame-work for reading works of literature in such a way as to illuminate previously ignored aspects of those works. It investigates the nature or genre of such discoveries: Are they philological? Hermeneutic? Do they correspond to the discipline of the framework selected? This problem is considered in the case of an example of the deployment of a very specific philosophical framework, namely the problem of skepticism as glossed by the American philosopher Stanley Cavell. This framework brings to light a structural affinity between two seemingly disparate moments in the history of German lyric poetry: the Biedermeier period and the works of Konkrete Dichtung from the mid-twentieth century. The paper postulates this affinity as an exam-ple of the kind of “discovery” whose type, usefulness, or even existence as discovery might be called into question and perhaps not, ultimately, agreed on.
Versetzen, Einfügen, Einwachsen – das sind die Umschreibungen der Aufpfropfung als einer Agrartechnik, mit der seit der Antike […] Pflanzen veredelt werden. Veredeln heißt dabei zum einen: Kultivieren, impliziert also eine qualitative Steigerung durch einen technischen Eingriff; zum anderen bedeutet Veredeln aber auch Konservieren: durch ein Verfahren der nicht-sexuellen, künstlichen Fortpflanzung Kopien herstellen und so das Veredelte in Kopie bewahren. Die Reproduktion fungiert mithin als eine Art ›Massenspeicher‹ des bereits Kultivierten. […] Im Folgenden möchte ich […] der Frage nachgehen, inwiefern sich Kultur als Pfropfung und Pfropfung als Kulturmodell begreifen lässt: In welcher Weise und in welchem Zusammenhang wurde und wird die Aufpfropfung als Metapher für kulturelle Prozesse, Praktiken und Produkte in Dienst genommen? Wie setzt sich der Begriff des Pfropfens gegen den momentan fast inflationär gebrauchten Begriff des Hybridisierens ab? Welchen intellektuellen Mehrwert bringt der Rekurs auf den Pfropfungsbegriff für poetologische, philosophische, interkulturelle, aber auch wissenschaftsgeschichtliche Fragestellungen? Anders gewendet: Was trägt das Aufpfropfungsmodell zum Verständnis von Kultur als Kulturprozess bei?
This article presents new directions of literary and media memory studies. It distinguishes between (1) the study of "traumatic pasts", i.e. representations of war and violence in literature and other media, (2) diachronic and intermedial approaches to "literary afterlives" and (3) recent insights into the inherent transculturality of memory and their consequences for literary and media studies. Keywords: cultural memory studies, literature and memory, media and memory, transcultural memory
Studierende und Lehrende des Faches Allgemeine und Vergleichende Literaturwissenschaft, die in den Beständen ihrer Bibliothek nicht fündig geworden sind, werden sich vielleicht fragen, warum viele ihrer Fernleihen von der Universitätsbibliothek Frankfurt am Main stammen. Dass sich ausgerechnet dort das Sondersammelgebiet für Allgemeine und Vergleichende Literaturwissenschaft befindet, mag überraschen, denn schließlich wurde an der Goethe-Universität ein eigenes Institut für Komparatistik erst im Sommersemester 2001 gegründet. [...] Die bedeutenden Bestände der Rothschildschen Bibliothek, die durch rechtzeitige Auslagerung ohne größere Verluste den Zweiten Weltkrieg überstanden haben, waren u. a. ausschlaggebend dafür, dass 1949 der damaligen Stadt- und Universitätsbibliothek Frankfurt von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft die Sondersammelgebiete »Allgemeine und Vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft« (SSG 7.11), »Germanistik« (SSG 7.20) sowie »Allgemeine und Vergleichende Literaturwissenschaft« (SSG 7.12) zugewiesen wurden. [...] So sehr es auch Utopie bleiben wird, gerade im Blick auf eine per se fachübergreifende Disziplin, so besteht doch der Anspruch, die wissenschaftliche Literatur eines Faches (auch und gerade die im Ausland erscheinende) möglichst umfassend und vollständig zu sammeln […]. Publikationen in digitaler Form sind solchen in konventioneller Gestalt gleichgestellt. Jede wissenschaftliche Publikation ist damit im Idealfall zumindest einmal in Deutschland vorhanden.