CompaRe | Allgemeine und Vergleichende Literaturwissenschaft
Refine
Document Type
- Article (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Keywords
- Literaturrezeption (2) (remove)
Macht Wirkung Geschichte? : die ungarische Rezeption von Péter Esterházys "Verbesserte Ausgabe"
(2009)
Das Erscheinen von Péter Esterházys "Verbesserte Ausgabe" (VA) im Frühjahr 2002 wurde in Ungarn als ein richtiges "literarisches Ereignis" empfunden: Man betrachtete das Werk als ein solches, das man nicht nur gelesen haben muß, sondern auch als eines, in welchem sich die Begegnung von "Literatur" und "Leben" in einmaliger Weise verwirklicht. [...] In seinem Beitrag fasst Marcell Mártonffy zuerst die Fakten und Umstände der Entstehung der VA zusammen (I.). Danach setzt er sich mit der ersten Welle der ungarischen Rezeption - mit deren wichtigsten Fragestellungen und interpretativen Ansätzen - auseinander, um den Ereignischarakter des Werkes näher zu beleuchten (II.). Schließlich versucht er, bezüglich der Chance literarischer "Vergangenheitsbewältigung", deren Anspruch bereits in der Veröffentlichung der VA sowie in den darauffolgenden kritischen Stellungnahmen betont zum Ausdruck kommt, einige Konsequenzen zu ziehen (III.).
If there is one thing to be learned from David Foster Wallace, it is that cultural transmission is a tricky game. This was a problem Wallace confronted as a literary professional, a university-based writer during what Mark McGurl has called the Program Era. But it was also a philosophical issue he grappled with on a deep level as he struggled to combat his own loneliness through writing. This fundamental concern with literature as a social, collaborative enterprise has also gained some popularity among scholars of contemporary American literature, particularly McGurl and James English: both critics explore the rules by which prestige or cultural distinction is awarded to authors (English; McGurl). Their approach requires a certain amount of empirical work, since these claims move beyond the individual experience of the text into forms of collective reading and cultural exchange influenced by social class, geographical location, education, ethnicity, and other factors. Yet McGurl and English's groundbreaking work is limited by the very forms of exclusivity they analyze: the protective bubble of creative writing programs in the academy and the elite economy of prestige surrounding literary prizes, respectively. To really study the problem of cultural transmission, we need to look beyond the symbolic markets of prestige to the real market, the site of mass literary consumption, where authors succeed or fail based on their ability to speak to that most diverse and complicated of readerships: the general public. Unless we study what I call the social lives of books, we make the mistake of keeping literature in the same ascetic laboratory that Wallace tried to break out of with his intense authorial focus on popular culture, mass media, and everyday life.